These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37788638)

  • 1. Misclassification of females and males in cardiovascular magnetic resonance parametric mapping: the importance of sex-specific normal ranges for diagnosis of health vs. disease.
    Thomas KE; Lukaschuk E; Shanmuganathan M; Kitt JA; Popescu IA; Neubauer S; Piechnik SK; Ferreira VM
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2024 Feb; 25(3):339-346. PubMed ID: 37788638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reference ranges of myocardial T1 and T2 mapping in healthy Chinese adults: a multicenter 3T cardiovascular magnetic resonance study.
    Xu Z; Li W; Wang J; Wang F; Sun B; Xiang S; Luo X; Meng Y; Wang X; Wang X; Song J; Zhang M; Xu D; Zhou X; Ju Z; Sun J; Han Y; Chen Y
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2023 Nov; 25(1):64. PubMed ID: 37968645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Inter-scanner comparability of Z-scores for native myocardial T1 and T2 mapping.
    Razzaq S; Haririsanati L; Eyre K; Garg R; Chetrit M; Friedrich MG
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2024; 26(1):100004. PubMed ID: 38211657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Native T1 and T2 reference values for maltese healthy cohort.
    Yamagata K; Yamagata LM; Abela M; Portanier Mifsud C; Micallef LA; Reichmuth L; Borg A
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2023 Jan; 39(1):153-159. PubMed ID: 36598695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Myocardial T1 Values at 1.5 T: Normal Values for General Electric Scanners and Sex-Related Differences.
    Meloni A; Martini N; Positano V; D'Angelo G; Barison A; Todiere G; Grigoratos C; Barra V; Pistoia L; Gargani L; Ripoli A; Pepe A
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2021 Nov; 54(5):1486-1500. PubMed ID: 33848021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Age and sex corrected normal reference values of T1, T2 T2* and ECV in healthy subjects at 3T CMR.
    Roy C; Slimani A; de Meester C; Amzulescu M; Pasquet A; Vancraeynest D; Vanoverschelde JL; Pouleur AC; Gerber BL
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2017 Sep; 19(1):72. PubMed ID: 28934962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. SwinUNet: a multiscale feature learning approach to cardiovascular magnetic resonance parametric mapping for myocardial tissue characterization.
    Qi Y; Wang F; Kong J; Cao JJ; Li YY
    Physiol Meas; 2024 Mar; 45(3):. PubMed ID: 38387052
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. T1 and T2 mapping cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging techniques reveal unapparent myocardial injury in patients with myocarditis.
    Radunski UK; Lund GK; Säring D; Bohnen S; Stehning C; Schnackenburg B; Avanesov M; Tahir E; Adam G; Blankenberg S; Muellerleile K
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2017 Jan; 106(1):10-17. PubMed ID: 27388331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reference values of myocardial structure, function, and tissue composition by cardiac magnetic resonance in healthy African-Americans at 3T and their relations to serologic and cardiovascular risk factors.
    Liu CY; Bluemke DA; Gerstenblith G; Zimmerman SL; Li J; Zhu H; Lai S; Lai H
    Am J Cardiol; 2014 Sep; 114(5):789-795. PubMed ID: 25037675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multi-site comparison of parametric T1 and T2 mapping: healthy travelling volunteers in the Berlin research network for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (BER-CMR).
    Gröschel J; Trauzeddel RF; Müller M; von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F; Viezzer D; Hadler T; Blaszczyk E; Daud E; Schulz-Menger J
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2023 Aug; 25(1):47. PubMed ID: 37574535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Normal values of native T
    Barczuk-Falęcka M; Małek ŁA; Werys K; Roik D; Adamus K; Brzewski M
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Mar; 51(3):912-918. PubMed ID: 31361078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cardiac magnetic resonance including parametric mapping in acute Takotsubo syndrome: Preliminary findings.
    Dabir D; Luetkens J; Kuetting DLR; Feisst A; Isaak A; Schild HH; Thomas D
    Eur J Radiol; 2019 Apr; 113():217-224. PubMed ID: 30927950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Liver T1 and T2 mapping in a large cohort of healthy subjects: normal ranges and correlation with age and sex.
    Meloni A; Carnevale A; Gaio P; Positano V; Passantino C; Pepe A; Barison A; Todiere G; Grigoratos C; Novani G; Pistoia L; Giganti M; Cademartiri F; Cossu A
    MAGMA; 2024 Feb; 37(1):93-100. PubMed ID: 38019376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Non-contrast T1-mapping detects acute myocardial edema with high diagnostic accuracy: a comparison to T2-weighted cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
    Ferreira VM; Piechnik SK; Dall'Armellina E; Karamitsos TD; Francis JM; Choudhury RP; Friedrich MG; Robson MD; Neubauer S
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2012 Jun; 14(1):42. PubMed ID: 22720998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Normal variation of magnetic resonance T1 relaxation times in the human population at 1.5 T using ShMOLLI.
    Piechnik SK; Ferreira VM; Lewandowski AJ; Ntusi NA; Banerjee R; Holloway C; Hofman MB; Sado DM; Maestrini V; White SK; Lazdam M; Karamitsos T; Moon JC; Neubauer S; Leeson P; Robson MD
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2013 Jan; 15(1):13. PubMed ID: 23331520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Prognostic significance of T2 mapping in evaluating myocardium alterations in patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction].
    Cui Q; He Q; Ge X; Gao G; Liu Y; Yu J; Wang H; Shen W
    Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2023 Dec; 35(12):1304-1308. PubMed ID: 38149394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of different cardiovascular magnetic resonance sequences for native myocardial T1 mapping at 3T.
    Teixeira T; Hafyane T; Stikov N; Akdeniz C; Greiser A; Friedrich MG
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2016 Oct; 18(1):65. PubMed ID: 27716344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of native myocardial T1 and T2 mapping at 1.5T and 3T in healthy volunteers : Reference values and clinical implications.
    Granitz M; Motloch LJ; Granitz C; Meissnitzer M; Hitzl W; Hergan K; Schlattau A
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2019 Apr; 131(7-8):143-155. PubMed ID: 30519737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multiparametric cardiovascular magnetic resonance characteristics and dynamic changes in myocardial and skeletal muscles in idiopathic inflammatory cardiomyopathy.
    Xu Y; Sun J; Wan K; Yu L; Wang J; Li W; Yang F; Sun J; Cheng W; Mui D; Zhang Q; Xie Q; Chen Y
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2020 Apr; 22(1):22. PubMed ID: 32272936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reference values of myocardial native T1 and T2 mapping values in normal Indian population at 1.5 Tesla scanner.
    Shaw M; Ojha V; Ganga KP; Malhi AS; Chandrashekhara SH; Kumar S; Khan MA; Jagia P; Sharma S
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2022 Nov; 38(11):2403-2411. PubMed ID: 36434341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.