150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37789207)
1. Ultrasonographic diagnosis of adnexal masses: interobserver agreement in the interpretation of videos, using IOTA terminology.
Massobrio R; Mariani LL; Conti D; De Grandis T; Buonomo F; Badellino E; Novara L; Bounous VE; Perotto S; Mancarella M; Ferrero A; Biglia N; Fuso L
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2024 Jan; 309(1):211-218. PubMed ID: 37789207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intra- and interobserver agreement with regard to describing adnexal masses using International Ovarian Tumor Analysis terminology: reproducibility study involving seven observers.
Zannoni L; Savelli L; Jokubkiene L; Di Legge A; Condous G; Testa AC; Sladkevicius P; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jul; 44(1):100-8. PubMed ID: 24307182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Simple Rules, Not So Simple: The Use of International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) Terminology and Simple Rules in Inexperienced Hands in a Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study.
Meys E; Rutten I; Kruitwagen R; Slangen B; Lambrechts S; Mertens H; Nolting E; Boskamp D; Van Gorp T
Ultraschall Med; 2017 Dec; 38(6):633-641. PubMed ID: 28834973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prospective external validation of IOTA three-step strategy for characterizing and classifying adnexal masses and retrospective assessment of alternative two-step strategy using simple-rules risk.
Hidalgo JJ; Ros F; Aubá M; Errasti T; Olartecoechea B; Ruiz-Zambrana Á; Alcázar JL
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 May; 53(5):693-700. PubMed ID: 30353585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Interobserver agreement in describing adnexal masses using the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis simple rules in a real-time setting and using three-dimensional ultrasound volumes and digital clips.
Ruiz de Gauna B; Sanchez P; Pineda L; Utrilla-Layna J; Juez L; Alcázar JL
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jul; 44(1):95-9. PubMed ID: 24265132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. IOTA Simple Rules in Differentiating between Benign and Malignant Adnexal Masses by Non-expert Examiners.
Tinnangwattana D; Vichak-Ururote L; Tontivuthikul P; Charoenratana C; Lerthiranwong T; Tongsong T
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(9):3835-8. PubMed ID: 25987045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intra- and interobserver agreement when describing adnexal masses using the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis terms and definitions: a study on three-dimensional ultrasound volumes.
Sladkevicius P; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Mar; 41(3):318-27. PubMed ID: 22915506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Interobserver agreement between eight observers using IOTA simple rules and O-RADS lexicon descriptors for adnexal masses.
Antil N; Raghu PR; Shen L; Tiyarattanachai T; Chang EM; Ferguson CWK; Ho AA; Lutz AM; Mariano AJ; Morimoto LN; Kamaya A
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2022 Sep; 47(9):3318-3326. PubMed ID: 35763052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Interobserver agreement in assigning IOTA color score to adnexal masses using three-dimensional volumes or digital videoclips: potential implications for training.
Pineda L; Salcedo E; Vilhena C; Juez L; Alcázar JL
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Sep; 44(3):361-4. PubMed ID: 24816975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessing the reproducibility of the IOTA simple ultrasound rules for classifying adnexal masses as benign or malignant using stored 3D volumes.
Guerriero S; Saba L; Ajossa S; Peddes C; Sedda F; Piras A; Olartecoechea B; Aubá M; Alcázar JL
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Nov; 171(1):157-60. PubMed ID: 24060210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Subjective assessment of adnexal masses with the use of ultrasonography: an analysis of interobserver variability and experience.
Timmerman D; Schwärzler P; Collins WP; Claerhout F; Coenen M; Amant F; Vergote I; Bourne TH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Jan; 13(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 10201081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intra- and interobserver reproducibility of assessment of Doppler ultrasound findings in adnexal masses.
Zannoni L; Savelli L; Jokubkiene L; Di Legge A; Condous G; Testa AC; Sladkevicius P; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Jul; 42(1):93-101. PubMed ID: 23065868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of IOTA Simple Rules, IOTA ADNEX Model, RMI, and Subjective Assessment for Preoperative Adnexal Mass Evaluation: The Experience of a Tertiary Care Referral Hospital.
Vilendecic Z; Radojevic M; Stefanovic K; Dotlic J; Likic Ladjevic I; Dugalic S; Stefanovic A
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2023; 88(2):116-122. PubMed ID: 36716716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Lesion size affects diagnostic performance of IOTA logistic regression models, IOTA simple rules and risk of malignancy index in discriminating between benign and malignant adnexal masses.
Di Legge A; Testa AC; Ameye L; Van Calster B; Lissoni AA; Leone FP; Savelli L; Franchi D; Czekierdowski A; Trio D; Van Holsbeke C; Ferrazzi E; Scambia G; Timmerman D; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Sep; 40(3):345-54. PubMed ID: 22611001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. External validation of IOTA simple descriptors and simple rules for classifying adnexal masses.
Alcázar JL; Pascual MA; Graupera B; Aubá M; Errasti T; Olartecoechea B; Ruiz-Zambrana A; Hereter L; Ajossa S; Guerriero S
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Sep; 48(3):397-402. PubMed ID: 26748432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of ultrasonography performed by examiners with varied training and experience in predicting specific pathology of adnexal masses.
Sayasneh A; Kaijser J; Preisler J; Smith AA; Raslan F; Johnson S; Husicka R; Ferrara L; Stalder C; Ghaem-Maghami S; Timmerman D; Bourne T
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 May; 45(5):605-12. PubMed ID: 25270506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Prospective External Validation of International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) Simple Rules in the Hands of Level I and II Examiners.
Knafel A; Banas T; Nocun A; Wiechec M; Jach R; Ludwin A; Kabzinska-Turek M; Pietrus M; Pitynski K
Ultraschall Med; 2016 Oct; 37(5):516-523. PubMed ID: 26126150
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic performance of IOTA simple rules for adnexal masses classification: a comparison between two centers with different ovarian cancer prevalence.
Ruiz de Gauna B; Rodriguez D; Olartecoechea B; Aubá M; Jurado M; Gómez Roig MD; Alcázar JL
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Aug; 191():10-4. PubMed ID: 26066289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The prediction of pouch of Douglas obliteration using offline analysis of the transvaginal ultrasound 'sliding sign' technique: inter- and intra-observer reproducibility.
Reid S; Lu C; Casikar I; Mein B; Magotti R; Ludlow J; Benzie R; Condous G
Hum Reprod; 2013 May; 28(5):1237-46. PubMed ID: 23482338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnostic Accuracy of Biomarkers and International Ovarian Tumor Analysis Simple Rules in Diagnosis of Ovarian Cancer.
Haliti TI; Hoxha I; Mojsiu R; Mandal R; Goç G; Hoti KD
Hematol Oncol Clin North Am; 2024 Feb; 38(1):251-265. PubMed ID: 37537110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
