These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37791214)

  • 1. Facial Soft Tissue Characteristics Among Sagittal and Vertical Skeletal Patterns: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Study.
    Alhazmi N; Alrasheed F; Alshayea K; Almubarak T; Alzeer B; Alorf MS; Alshanqiti A; Albalawi M
    Cureus; 2023 Aug; 15(8):e44428. PubMed ID: 37791214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of Facial Soft Tissue Dimensions in Adult Patients with Different Sagittal Skeletal Classes using Cone beam Computed Tomography.
    Jazmati HM; Ajaj MA; Hajeer MY
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Jul; 17(7):542-8. PubMed ID: 27595719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Cone-beam CT evaluation of temporomandibular joint in skeletal class Ⅱ female adolescents with different vertical patterns].
    Zhou J; Liu Y
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2020 Dec; 53(1):109-119. PubMed ID: 33550344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comprehensive three-dimensional positional and morphological assessment of the temporomandibular joint in skeletal Class II patients with mandibular retrognathism in different vertical skeletal patterns.
    Al-Hadad SA; ALyafrusee ES; Abdulqader AA; Al-Gumaei WS; Al-Mohana RAAM; Ren L
    BMC Oral Health; 2022 Apr; 22(1):149. PubMed ID: 35484618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Treatment change comparisons between skeletal Class I and II white adolescents with 3 different vertical divergencies-part 1: Frankfort-Mandibular Incisor Angle (FMIA) and soft-tissue profile.
    Kang HK; Liu T; Kaczynski R; Vaden JL
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2023 Sep; 164(3):377-385. PubMed ID: 37003905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of mandibular cross-sectional morphology between Class I and Class II subjects with different vertical patterns: based on CBCT images and statistical shape analysis.
    Chen H; Liu Z; Hu X; Wu B; Gu Y
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 May; 21(1):238. PubMed ID: 33952217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of anterior mandibular alveolar thickness and height in young adults with different sagittal and vertical skeletal relationships: A CBCT Study.
    Casanova-Sarmiento JA; Arriola-Guillén LE; Ruíz-Mora GA; Rodríguez-Cárdenas YA; Aliaga-Del Castillo A
    Int Orthod; 2020 Mar; 18(1):79-88. PubMed ID: 31735681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of condylar size among different anteroposterior and vertical skeletal patterns using cone-beam computed tomography.
    Hasebe A; Yamaguchi T; Nakawaki T; Hikita Y; Katayama K; Maki K
    Angle Orthod; 2019 Mar; 89(2):306-311. PubMed ID: 30475648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of masseter muscle morphology in different types of malocclusions using cone beam computed tomography.
    Becht MP; Mah J; Martin C; Razmus T; Gunel E; Ngan P
    Int Orthod; 2014 Mar; 12(1):32-48. PubMed ID: 24456631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative Evaluation of Soft Tissue Chin Thickness in Adult Patients with Skeletal Class II Malocclusion with Various Vertical Growth Patterns: a Cephalometric Study.
    Patil HS; Golwalkar S; Chougule K; Kulkarni NR
    Folia Med (Plovdiv); 2021 Feb; 63(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 33650399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Correlation between facial growth patterns and cortical bone thickness assessed with cone-beam computed tomography in young adult untreated patients.
    Gaffuri F; Cossellu G; Maspero C; Lanteri V; Ugolini A; Rasperini G; Castro IO; Farronato M
    Saudi Dent J; 2021 Mar; 33(3):161-167. PubMed ID: 33679110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Volumetric Analysis of the Jaws in Skeletal Class I and III Patients with Different Facial Divergence Using CBCT Imaging.
    Alhawasli RY; Ajaj MA; Hajeer MY; Al-Zahabi AMR; Mahaini L
    Radiol Res Pract; 2022; 2022():2416555. PubMed ID: 35668737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Relationship between vertical facial morphology and dental arch measurements in class II malocclusion: a retrospective study.
    Ocak I; Karsli N; Altug AT; Aksu M
    PeerJ; 2023; 11():e16031. PubMed ID: 37692120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of buccolingual molar inclinations among different vertical facial types.
    Eraydin F; Cakan DG; Tozlu M; Ozdemir F
    Korean J Orthod; 2018 Sep; 48(5):333-338. PubMed ID: 30206532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Three-dimensional evaluation of soft tissues in hyperdivergent skeletal class II females in Guangdong.
    Zhang X; Zheng J; Deng J; Wen Z; Chen Z; Gan L; Wu L
    BMC Med Imaging; 2022 Mar; 22(1):56. PubMed ID: 35351027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Soft tissue thickness in Brazilian adults of different skeletal classes and facial types: A cone beam CT - Study.
    Farias Gomes A; Moreira DD; Zanon MF; Groppo FC; Haiter-Neto F; Freitas DQ
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2020 Nov; 47():101743. PubMed ID: 32659706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of Size of the Condyle in Vertical and Anteroposterior Skeletal Conditions with the Help of Cone-beam Computed Tomography.
    Jyotirmay ; Singh SK; Adarsh K; Sinha A; Kumar A; Sharan S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Feb; 22(2):189-193. PubMed ID: 34257181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Association of Upper Lip Morphology Characteristics with Sagittal and Vertical Skeletal Patterns: A Cross Sectional Study.
    Yan X; Zhang X; Chen Y; Long H; Lai W
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2021 Sep; 11(9):. PubMed ID: 34574054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of mandibular divergence on facial soft tissue thickness in class I patients: a cephalometric study.
    Perović TM; Blažej M; Jovanović I
    Folia Morphol (Warsz); 2022; 81(2):472-480. PubMed ID: 33778942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cephalometric Evaluation of Maxillary Incisors Inclination, Facial, and Growth Axes in Different Vertical and Sagittal Patterns: An Original Study.
    Bou Assi S; Macari A; Hanna A; Tarabay R; Salameh Z
    J Int Soc Prev Community Dent; 2020; 10(3):292-299. PubMed ID: 32802775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.