162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37792108)
1. Fractal analysis of the mandible cortical bone: correlation among fractal dimension values obtained by two processing methods from periapical radiograph and micro-computed tomography with cone-beam computed tomography.
de Oliveira Loures A; de Abreu M; Devito KL; Grisolia-Seifert EF; Jähn-Rickert K; Rabelo GD
Radiat Environ Biophys; 2023 Nov; 62(4):511-518. PubMed ID: 37792108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of trabecular pattern of mandible using fractal dimension, bone area fraction, and gray scale value: comparison of cone-beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography.
Magat G; Ozcan Sener S
Oral Radiol; 2019 Jan; 35(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 30484179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of periapical radiography, panoramic radiography, and CBCT in the evaluation of trabecular bone structure using fractal analysis.
Yavuz E; Yardimci S
Oral Radiol; 2024 Jul; 40(3):394-400. PubMed ID: 38407759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fractal analysis of the trabecular bone pattern in the presence/absence of metal artifact-producing objects: Comparison of cone-beam computed tomography with panoramic and periapical radiography.
Vadiati Saberi B; Khosravifard N; Nooshmand K; Dalili Kajan Z; Ghaffari ME
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2021 Sep; 50(6):20200559. PubMed ID: 33705225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of mandibular bone microarchitecture between micro-CT and CBCT images.
Panmekiate S; Ngonphloy N; Charoenkarn T; Faruangsaeng T; Pauwels R
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(5):20140322. PubMed ID: 25564887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of cone-beam computed tomography and digital panoramic radiography for detecting peri-implant alveolar bone changes using trabecular micro-structure analysis.
Magat G; Oncu E; Ozcan S; Orhan K
J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Feb; 48(1):41-49. PubMed ID: 35221306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The reliability of cone-beam computed tomography to assess bone density at dental implant recipient sites: a histomorphometric analysis by micro-CT.
González-García R; Monje F
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24(8):871-9. PubMed ID: 22250839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Feasibility of cone beam computed tomography radiomorphometric analysis and fractal dimension in assessment of postmenopausal osteoporosis in correlation with dual X-ray absorptiometry.
Mostafa RA; Arnout EA; Abo El-Fotouh MM
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(7):20160212. PubMed ID: 27418348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bone quality evaluation at dental implant site using multislice CT, micro-CT, and cone beam CT.
Parsa A; Ibrahim N; Hassan B; van der Stelt P; Wismeijer D
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015; 26(1):e1-7. PubMed ID: 24325572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantification of bone microstructure in the wrist using cone-beam computed tomography.
Mys K; Stockmans F; Vereecke E; van Lenthe GH
Bone; 2018 Sep; 114():206-214. PubMed ID: 29909060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantification of bone quality using different cone beam computed tomography devices: Accuracy assessment for edentulous human mandibles.
Van Dessel J; Nicolielo LF; Huang Y; Slagmolen P; Politis C; Lambrichts I; Jacobs R
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2016; 9(4):411-424. PubMed ID: 27990508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the Correlation Between the Structural Parameters of Trabecular Bone in CBCT and the Primary Stability of Dental Implants.
Shokri A; Armand N; Shahabi S; Torkzaban P; Tapak L; Poormoradi B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2024 Apr; 39(2):271-277. PubMed ID: 38657219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fractal analysis of dental periapical radiographs: A revised image processing method.
da Silva MEB; Dos Santos HS; Ruhland L; Rabelo GD; Badaró MM
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2023 May; 135(5):669-677. PubMed ID: 36609053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy and reliability of different cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) devices for structural analysis of alveolar bone in comparison with multislice CT and micro-CT.
Van Dessel J; Nicolielo LF; Huang Y; Coudyzer W; Salmon B; Lambrichts I; Jacobs R
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2017; 10(1):95-105. PubMed ID: 28327698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of 2- and 3-dimensional anatomic parameters of C-shaped root canals with cone beam computed tomography, microcomputed tomography, and nanocomputed tomography.
Molina MAV; Silva GO; Candemil AP; Camargo RV; Pauwels R; Jacobs R; Sousa-Neto MD; Mazzi-Chaves JF
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2023 Dec; 136(6):759-768. PubMed ID: 37580223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fractal dimension, lacunarity, and cortical thickness in the mandible: Analyzing differences between healthy men and women with cone-beam computed tomography.
Santos IG; Ramos de Faria F; da Silva Campos MJ; de Barros BÁC; Rabelo GD; Devito KL
Imaging Sci Dent; 2023 Jun; 53(2):153-159. PubMed ID: 37405205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantification of external root resorption by low- vs high-resolution cone-beam computed tomography and periapical radiography: A volumetric and linear analysis.
Ponder SN; Benavides E; Kapila S; Hatch NE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jan; 143(1):77-91. PubMed ID: 23273363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bone quality assessment based on cone beam computed tomography imaging.
Hua Y; Nackaerts O; Duyck J; Maes F; Jacobs R
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Aug; 20(8):767-71. PubMed ID: 19489931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of chronic renal failure with cone beam computed tomography radiomorphometric indices and fractal analysis in the mandible.
Ersu N; Şirin Sarıbal G; Tanyeri FZ; Amuk M
Oral Radiol; 2023 Jan; 39(1):133-142. PubMed ID: 35484445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of micro-CT and cone beam CT-based assessments for relative difference of grey level distribution in a human mandible.
Taylor TT; Gans SI; Jones EM; Firestone AR; Johnston WM; Kim DG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(3):25117764. PubMed ID: 22996393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
