These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Comparative diagnostic accuracy studies with an imperfect reference standard - a comparison of correction methods. Umemneku Chikere CM; Wilson KJ; Allen AJ; Vale L BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Apr; 21(1):67. PubMed ID: 33845775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Rapid detection of health-care-associated bloodstream infection in critical care using multipathogen real-time polymerase chain reaction technology: a diagnostic accuracy study and systematic review. Warhurst G; Dunn G; Chadwick P; Blackwood B; McAuley D; Perkins GD; McMullan R; Gates S; Bentley A; Young D; Carlson GL; Dark P Health Technol Assess; 2015 May; 19(35):1-142. PubMed ID: 25961752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. MAPGI: Accurate identification of anatomical landmarks and diseased tissue in gastrointestinal tract using deep learning. Cogan T; Cogan M; Tamil L Comput Biol Med; 2019 Aug; 111():103351. PubMed ID: 31325742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effect of dependent errors in the assessment of diagnostic or screening test accuracy when the reference standard is imperfect. Walter SD; Macaskill P; Lord SJ; Irwig L Stat Med; 2012 May; 31(11-12):1129-38. PubMed ID: 22351623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The predictive value of segmentation metrics on dosimetry in organs at risk of the brain. Poel R; Rüfenacht E; Hermann E; Scheib S; Manser P; Aebersold DM; Reyes M Med Image Anal; 2021 Oct; 73():102161. PubMed ID: 34293536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A VGG attention vision transformer network for benign and malignant classification of breast ultrasound images. Qu X; Lu H; Tang W; Wang S; Zheng D; Hou Y; Jiang J Med Phys; 2022 Sep; 49(9):5787-5798. PubMed ID: 35866492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Automatic worm detection to solve overlapping problems using a convolutional neural network. Mori S; Tachibana Y; Suzuki M; Harada Y Sci Rep; 2022 May; 12(1):8521. PubMed ID: 35595864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Observed differences in diagnostic test accuracy between patient subgroups: is it real or due to reference standard misclassification? Biesheuvel C; Irwig L; Bossuyt P Clin Chem; 2007 Oct; 53(10):1725-9. PubMed ID: 17885138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. DE-PNN: Differential Evolution-Based Feature Optimization with Probabilistic Neural Network for Imbalanced Arrhythmia Classification. Nasim A; Kim YS Sensors (Basel); 2022 Jun; 22(12):. PubMed ID: 35746232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Automated Brain Tumour Detection and Classification using Deep Features and Bayesian Optimised Classifiers. Kumar SA; Sasikala S Curr Med Imaging; 2023 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 37018527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Airway physical examination tests for detection of difficult airway management in apparently normal adult patients. Roth D; Pace NL; Lee A; Hovhannisyan K; Warenits AM; Arrich J; Herkner H Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 May; 5(5):CD008874. PubMed ID: 29761867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Offline accuracy: A potentially misleading metric in myoelectric pattern recognition for prosthetic control. Ortiz-Catalan M; Rouhani F; Branemark R; Hakansson B Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2015 Aug; 2015():1140-3. PubMed ID: 26736467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A fully integrated computer-aided diagnosis system for digital X-ray mammograms via deep learning detection, segmentation, and classification. Al-Antari MA; Al-Masni MA; Choi MT; Han SM; Kim TS Int J Med Inform; 2018 Sep; 117():44-54. PubMed ID: 30032964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Assessment of the predictive accuracy of five in silico prediction tools, alone or in combination, and two metaservers to classify long QT syndrome gene mutations. Leong IU; Stuckey A; Lai D; Skinner JR; Love DR BMC Med Genet; 2015 May; 16():34. PubMed ID: 25967940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Performance of in silico prediction tools for the classification of rare BRCA1/2 missense variants in clinical diagnostics. Ernst C; Hahnen E; Engel C; Nothnagel M; Weber J; Schmutzler RK; Hauke J BMC Med Genomics; 2018 Mar; 11(1):35. PubMed ID: 29580235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Diagnostic accuracy study of automated stratification of Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment via deep learning based on MRI. Chen X; Tang M; Liu A; Wei X Ann Transl Med; 2022 Jul; 10(14):765. PubMed ID: 35965800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of ready biodegradation estimation methods for fragrance materials. Boethling R Sci Total Environ; 2014 Nov; 497-498():60-67. PubMed ID: 25119791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Automated Detection of Driver Fatigue Based on AdaBoost Classifier with EEG Signals. Hu J Front Comput Neurosci; 2017; 11():72. PubMed ID: 28824409 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]