119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37792993)
1. Long-term outcome of minimally invasive staging surgery for clinical stage I endometrial cancer: A single institute experience in Taiwan.
Lu TF; Lu CH; Sun L; Liu CK; Shih YH; Hwang SF; Hsu ST
J Chin Med Assoc; 2024 Jan; 87(1):79-87. PubMed ID: 37792993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Long-term oncological safety of minimally invasive surgery in high-risk endometrial cancer.
Koskas M; Jozwiak M; Fournier M; Vergote I; Trum H; Lok C; Amant F
Eur J Cancer; 2016 Sep; 65():185-91. PubMed ID: 27505629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery for the treatment of stage I endometrial cancer.
Argenta PA; Mattson J; Rivard CL; Luther E; Schefter A; Vogel RI
Gynecol Oncol; 2022 May; 165(2):347-352. PubMed ID: 35314086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Comparison of the short-term and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic surgery for early-stage endometrial cancer].
He H; Yang Z; Zhang J; Yao D; Fan J; Zhao R; Zeng D; Hu X; Lin Z; Jiang Y; Li L
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 50(12):902-9. PubMed ID: 26887873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Minimally Invasive Approach in Type II Endometrial Cancer: Is It Wise and Safe?
Monterossi G; Ghezzi F; Vizza E; Zannoni GF; Uccella S; Corrado G; Restaino S; Quagliozzi L; Casarin J; Dinoi G; Scambia G; Fanfani F
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(3):438-445. PubMed ID: 28065812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Outcomes of minimally invasive surgery for patients with endometrial carcinoma involving the cervix.
Nasioudis D; Frey MK; Chapman-Davis E; Caputo TA; Holcomb K
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 May; 30(5):619-625. PubMed ID: 32276935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Minimally invasive approach in endometrial cancer with lower uterine segment involvement in stage ≥ II: A retrospective study.
Perri T; Levin G; Helpman L; Eitan R; Vaknin Z; Lavie O; Ben Arie A; Amit A; Levy T; Namazov A; Ben Shachar I; Atlas I; Bruchim I; Kogan L; Gemer O
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2022 Jan; 268():43-47. PubMed ID: 34800816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Minimally invasive surgery versus laparotomy for radical hysterectomy in the management of early-stage cervical cancer: Survival outcomes.
Brandt B; Sioulas V; Basaran D; Kuhn T; LaVigne K; Gardner GJ; Sonoda Y; Chi DS; Long Roche KC; Mueller JJ; Jewell EL; Broach VA; Zivanovic O; Abu-Rustum NR; Leitao MM
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Mar; 156(3):591-597. PubMed ID: 31918996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Minimally Invasive Staging Surgery in Women with Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: Analysis of the National Cancer Data Base.
Bregar AJ; Melamed A; Diver E; Clemmer JT; Uppal S; Schorge JO; Rice LW; Del Carmen MG; Rauh-Hain JA
Ann Surg Oncol; 2017 Jun; 24(6):1677-1687. PubMed ID: 28074326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Oncologic outcomes for patients with endometrial cancer who received minimally invasive surgery: a retrospective observational study.
Tanaka T; Ueda S; Miyamoto S; Terada S; Konishi H; Kogata Y; Fujiwara S; Tanaka Y; Taniguchi K; Komura K; Ohmichi M
Int J Clin Oncol; 2020 Nov; 25(11):1985-1994. PubMed ID: 32648131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Laparoscopy with or without robotic assistance does not negatively impact long-term oncologic outcomes in patients with uterine serous carcinoma.
Sia TY; Basaran D; Dagher C; Sassine D; Brandt B; Rosalik K; Mueller JJ; Broach V; Makker V; Soslow RA; Abu-Rustum NR; Leitao MM
Gynecol Oncol; 2023 Aug; 175():8-14. PubMed ID: 37267674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of Perioperative and Oncologic Outcomes with Laparotomy, and Laparoscopic or Robotic Surgery for Women with Endometrial Cancer.
Manchana T; Puangsricharoen P; Sirisabya N; Worasethsin P; Vasuratna A; Termrungruanglert W; Tresukosol D
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(13):5483-8. PubMed ID: 26225698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. When Less Is More: Minimally Invasive Surgery Compared with Laparotomy for Interval Debulking After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Women with Advanced Ovarian Cancer.
Brown J; Drury L; Crane EK; Anderson WE; Tait DL; Higgins RV; Naumann RW
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(5):902-909. PubMed ID: 30240899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Minimally invasive surgery versus laparotomy in women with high grade endometrial cancer: a multi-site study performed at high volume cancer centers.
Fader AN; Seamon LG; Escobar PF; Frasure HE; Havrilesky LA; Zanotti KM; Secord AA; Boggess JF; Cohn DE; Fowler JM; Skafianos G; Rossi E; Gehrig PA
Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Aug; 126(2):180-5. PubMed ID: 22555102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Minimally invasive surgery vs laparotomy for early stage cervical cancer: A propensity score-matched cohort study.
Dai D; Huang H; Feng Y; Wan T; Liu Z; Tong C; Liu J
Cancer Med; 2020 Dec; 9(24):9236-9245. PubMed ID: 33236825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical outcomes in endometrial cancer care when the standard of care shifts from open surgery to robotics.
Mok ZW; Yong EL; Low JJ; Ng JS
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Jun; 22(5):819-25. PubMed ID: 22561178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Does surgical platform impact recurrence and survival? A study of utilization of multiport, single-port, and robotic-assisted laparoscopy in endometrial cancer surgery.
Chambers LM; Carr C; Freeman L; Jernigan AM; Michener CM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Sep; 221(3):243.e1-243.e11. PubMed ID: 31075245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of Minimally Invasive and Open Surgery for the Treatment of Endometrial Cancer with a High Risk of Recurrence: A Propensity Score Matching Study in Korea and Taiwan.
Chang CS; Lai YL; Choi CH; Kim TJ; Lee JW; Kim BG; Cheng WF; Chen YL; Lee YY
Ann Surg Oncol; 2023 Oct; 30(11):6855-6864. PubMed ID: 37386310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of minimally invasive versus open surgery in the treatment of endometrial carcinosarcoma.
Pedra Nobre S; Mueller JJ; Gardner GJ; Long Roche K; Brown CL; Soslow RA; Alektiar KM; Sonoda Y; Broach VA; Jewell EL; Zivanovic O; Chi DS; Abu-Rustum NR; Leitao MM
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Aug; 30(8):1162-1168. PubMed ID: 32690592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Outcomes for patients with high-risk endometrial cancer undergoing sentinel lymph node assessment versus full lymphadenectomy.
Holtzman S; Stoffels G; Flint M; Carr C; Prasad-Hayes M; Zeligs K; Blank SV
Gynecol Oncol; 2023 Jul; 174():273-277. PubMed ID: 37270906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
