These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37793108)

  • 1. Men's satisfaction with female/unisex and male incontinence pads: a comparative clinical audit.
    Broom R
    Br J Community Nurs; 2023 Oct; 28(10):479-484. PubMed ID: 37793108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Men's satisfaction with female/unisex and male incontinence pads: a comparative clinical audit.
    Broom R
    Br J Nurs; 2023 Oct; 32(Sup19):S4-S10. PubMed ID: 37861471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pathway for post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence: impact on patient confidence and satisfaction.
    Broom R
    Br J Nurs; 2022 Oct; 31(18):S24-S31. PubMed ID: 36227787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pathway for post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence: impact on patient confidence and satisfaction.
    Broom R
    Br J Nurs; 2023 Oct; 32(Sup19):S17-S23. PubMed ID: 37861468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improving the performance of small incontinence pads: a study of "wet comfort".
    Thornburn P; Fader M; Dean G; Brooks R; Cottenden A
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 1997 Jul; 24(4):219-25. PubMed ID: 9274279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Absorbent products for urinary/faecal incontinence: a comparative evaluation of key product designs.
    Fader M; Cottenden A; Getliffe K; Gage H; Clarke-O'Neill S; Jamieson K; Green N; Williams P; Brooks R; Malone-Lee J
    Health Technol Assess; 2008 Jul; 12(29):iii-iv, ix-185. PubMed ID: 18547500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pad count is a poor measure of the severity of urinary incontinence.
    Tsui JF; Shah MB; Weinberger JM; Ghanaat M; Weiss JP; Purohit RS; Blaivas JG
    J Urol; 2013 Nov; 190(5):1787-90. PubMed ID: 23727311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Randomized Cross-over Comparison of Icon™ Reusable Underwear to Disposable Pads for the Management of Mild to Moderate Urinary Incontinence.
    Alam PA; Burkett LS; Clark BA; White NC; Tefera EA; Richter LA
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2018; 24(2):161-165. PubMed ID: 29474291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Correlation of patient perception of pad use with objective degree of incontinence measured by pad test in men with post-prostatectomy incontinence: the SUFU Pad Test Study.
    Nitti VW; Mourtzinos A; Brucker BM;
    J Urol; 2014 Sep; 192(3):836-42. PubMed ID: 24650425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Synthetic sling or artificial urinary sphincter for men with urodynamic stress incontinence after prostate surgery: the MASTER non-inferiority RCT.
    Constable L; Abrams P; Cooper D; Kilonzo M; Cotterill N; Harding C; Drake MJ; Pardoe MN; McDonald A; Smith R; Norrie J; McCormack K; Ramsay C; Uren A; Mundy T; Glazener C; MacLennan G
    Health Technol Assess; 2022 Aug; 26(36):1-152. PubMed ID: 35972773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: incidence by definition, risk factors and temporal trend in a large series with a long-term follow-up.
    Sacco E; Prayer-Galetti T; Pinto F; Fracalanza S; Betto G; Pagano F; Artibani W
    BJU Int; 2006 Jun; 97(6):1234-41. PubMed ID: 16686718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Exploration of user satisfaction in using the newly redesigned MoliCare Premium Men Pad: in-home use study.
    Sanaeifar N; Buch T; Debler M; Kesselmeier R; Canales S; Meer M
    Br J Nurs; 2024 Oct; 33(18):S22-S27. PubMed ID: 39392330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Patient satisfaction with a reusable undergarment for urinary incontinence.
    Gallo M; Staskin DR
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 1997 Jul; 24(4):226-36. PubMed ID: 9274280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Objectively improving appropriateness of absorbent products provision to patients with urinary incontinence: The DIAPPER study.
    Sacco E; Bientinesi R; Gandi C; Palermo G; Pierconti F; Bassi P
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2018 Jan; 37(1):485-495. PubMed ID: 28660675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pad test by mail for home evaluation of urinary incontinence.
    Flisser AJ; Figueroa J; Bleustein CB; Panagopoulos G; Blaivas JG
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2004; 23(2):127-9. PubMed ID: 14983423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of continence pads to manage urinary incontinence in older people.
    Nazarko L
    Br J Community Nurs; 2015 Aug; 20(8):378, 380, 382-4. PubMed ID: 26252233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Absorbent products for moderate-heavy urinary and/or faecal incontinence in women and men.
    Fader M; Cottenden AM; Getliffe K
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2008 Oct; (4):CD007408. PubMed ID: 18843748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use and costs of incontinence pads in female study volunteers. Continence Program for Women Research Group.
    McClish DK; Wyman JF; Sale PG; Camp J; Earle B
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 1999 Jul; 26(4):207-8, 210-3. PubMed ID: 10476176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of the home pad test in the investigation of female urinary incontinence.
    Versi E; Orrego G; Hardy E; Seddon G; Smith P; Anand D
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1996 Feb; 103(2):162-7. PubMed ID: 8616134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A cost-effectiveness study of the management of intractable urinary incontinence by urinary catheterisation or incontinence pads.
    McMurdo ME; Davey PG; Elder MA; Miller RM; Old DC; Malek M
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 1992 Jun; 46(3):222-6. PubMed ID: 1645076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.