125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37793199)
1. The increased angiogenic capacity and decreased inflammatory response when a mesh is used in combination with an omental flap. A prospective experimental study.
Karmiris NI; Albanis Z; Zafeirakis A; Vezakis A; Konstadoulakis M; Fragulidis GP
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2023 Nov; 86():261-268. PubMed ID: 37793199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Abdominal Wall Reconstruction Using Omental Flap with Mesh Repair following Resection of Aggressive Abdominal Wall Neoplasms.
Abouzid A; Shetiwy M; Hossam A; Abd Elghaffar M
Oncol Res Treat; 2022; 45(7-8):415-422. PubMed ID: 35537417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Use of double-layer autologous dermal flap in the treatment of recurrent and/or infected incisional hernias: presentation of the surgical technique and the results of 1-year follow-up-a prospective, consecutive cohort study.
Martis G; Damjanovich L
Hernia; 2016 Jun; 20(3):461-70. PubMed ID: 26597874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of a pedicled omental flap to reduce inflammation and vascularize an abdominal wall patch.
Uchibori T; Takanari K; Hashizume R; Amoroso NJ; Kamei Y; Wagner WR
J Surg Res; 2017 May; 212():77-85. PubMed ID: 28550925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Abdominal wall reconstruction following resection of large abdominal aggressive neoplasms using tensor fascia lata flap with or without mesh reinforcement.
Song Z; Yang D; Yang J; Nie X; Wu J; Song H; Gu Y
Hernia; 2018 Apr; 22(2):333-341. PubMed ID: 29417339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of autologous dermal flap as mesh coverage in the treatment of large abdominal-wall defect in patients following massive weight loss: presentation of a novel surgical technique.
Bitterman N; Ben-Nun O; Calderon N; Brodsky A; Galis I; Matter I; Sroka G
Hernia; 2020 Apr; 24(2):387-393. PubMed ID: 32062712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Resorbable Synthetic Meshes for Abdominal Wall Defects in Preclinical Setting: A Literature Review.
Miserez M; Jairam AP; Boersema GSA; Bayon Y; Jeekel J; Lange JF
J Surg Res; 2019 May; 237():67-75. PubMed ID: 30710881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Subtotal thigh flap and bioprosthetic mesh reconstruction for large, composite abdominal wall defects.
Lin SJ; Butler CE
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Apr; 125(4):1146-1156. PubMed ID: 20072081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Complex abdominal wall defect reconstruction using a latissimus dorsi free flap with mesh after malignant tumor resection.
Bodin F; Dissaux C; Romain B; Rohr S; Brigand C; Bruant-Rodier C
Microsurgery; 2017 Jan; 37(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 26037038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reinforcement of the abdominal wall with acellular dermal matrix or synthetic mesh after breast reconstruction with the pedicled transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap. A prospective double-blind randomized study.
Brunbjerg ME; Jensen TB; Christiansen P; Overgaard J; Engberg Damsgaard T
J Plast Surg Hand Surg; 2021 Aug; 55(4):202-209. PubMed ID: 33356728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Use of Bilayered Fascia Lata With an Interpositional Omental Flap for Autologous Repair of Contaminated Abdominal Fascial Defects.
Fong HC; Tan BK; Chow PK; Ong HS
Ann Plast Surg; 2017 Nov; 79(5):486-489. PubMed ID: 28953519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The use of tensor fascia lata pedicled flap in reconstructing full thickness abdominal wall defects and groin defects following tumor ablation.
Rifaat MA; Abdel Gawad WS
J Egypt Natl Canc Inst; 2005 Sep; 17(3):139-48. PubMed ID: 16799651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Complex abdominal wall reconstruction: a comparison of flap and mesh closure.
Mathes SJ; Steinwald PM; Foster RD; Hoffman WY; Anthony JP
Ann Surg; 2000 Oct; 232(4):586-96. PubMed ID: 10998657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluating mesh use for abdominal donor site closure after deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Parmeshwar N; Lem M; Dugan CL; Piper M
Microsurgery; 2023 Nov; 43(8):855-864. PubMed ID: 37697962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reinforcement of the abdominal wall following breast reconstruction with abdominal flaps: a comparison of synthetic and biological mesh.
Patel KM; Shuck J; Hung R; Hannan L; Nahabedian MY
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2014 Mar; 133(3):700-707. PubMed ID: 24572859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biologic mesh is non-inferior to synthetic mesh in CDC class 1 & 2 open abdominal wall reconstruction.
Shao JM; Ayuso SA; Deerenberg EB; Elhage SA; Prasad T; Colavita PD; Augenstein VA; Heniford BT
Am J Surg; 2022 Feb; 223(2):375-379. PubMed ID: 34140156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The sandwich omental flap for abdominal wall defect reconstruction.
El-Muttardi N; Lancaster K; Ng R; Mercer D
Br J Plast Surg; 2005 Sep; 58(6):841-4. PubMed ID: 16086992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Tissue integration of various silicone-coated polypropylene surgical mesh].
Takács I; Horváth S; Balatonyi B; Jávor S; Molnár A; Gáspár S; Hajós R; Meczker A; Lantos J; Roth E; Wéber G
Magy Seb; 2010 Oct; 63(5):340-6. PubMed ID: 20965868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Extended mesh repair with external oblique muscle reinforcement for abdominal wall contour abnormalities following TRAM flap.
Israeli R; Hazani R; Feingold RS; DeNoto G; Scheiner MS
Ann Plast Surg; 2009 Dec; 63(6):654-8. PubMed ID: 19934848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Inclusion of mesh in donor-site repair of free TRAM and muscle-sparing free TRAM flaps yields rates of abdominal complications comparable to those of DIEP flap reconstruction.
Wan DC; Tseng CY; Anderson-Dam J; Dalio AL; Crisera CA; Festekjian JH
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Aug; 126(2):367-374. PubMed ID: 20679822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
