These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37794059)

  • 1. Relative contributions of oculomotor capture and disengagement to distractor-related dwell times in visual search.
    Stefani M; Sauter M
    Sci Rep; 2023 Oct; 13(1):16676. PubMed ID: 37794059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evidence for a dissociation between the control of oculomotor capture and disengagement.
    Born S; Kerzel D; Theeuwes J
    Exp Brain Res; 2011 Feb; 208(4):621-31. PubMed ID: 21188362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Post-capture processes contribute to statistical learning of distractor locations in visual search.
    Sauter M; Hanning NM; Liesefeld HR; Müller HJ
    Cortex; 2021 Feb; 135():108-126. PubMed ID: 33360756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Salience-based selection: attentional capture by distractors less salient than the target.
    Zehetleitner M; Koch AI; Goschy H; Müller HJ
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(1):e52595. PubMed ID: 23382820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Oculomotor capture reveals trial-by-trial neural correlates of attentional guidance by contents of visual working memory.
    Beck VM; Vickery TJ
    Cortex; 2020 Jan; 122():159-169. PubMed ID: 30392969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Testing the underlying processes leading to learned distractor rejection: Learned oculomotor avoidance.
    Stilwell BT; Vecera SP
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Aug; 84(6):1964-1981. PubMed ID: 35386017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Can intertrial priming account for the similarity effect in visual search?
    Becker SI; Ansorge U; Horstmann G
    Vision Res; 2009 Jul; 49(14):1738-56. PubMed ID: 19358862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The development of oculomotor suppression of salient distractors in children.
    Blakley EC; Gaspelin N; Gerhardstein P
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2022 Feb; 214():105291. PubMed ID: 34607075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Attentional and oculomotor capture with static singletons.
    Theeuwes J; De Vries GJ; Godijn R
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Jul; 65(5):735-46. PubMed ID: 12956581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Exploring the breadth of the top-down representations that control attentional disengagement.
    Wright TJ; Boot WR; Jones JL
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(5):993-1006. PubMed ID: 25295752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Attentional disengagement effect based on relevant features.
    Hao Y; Zhang Q; Wang Z; Sun M
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():960183. PubMed ID: 36438363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The time course of attentional and oculomotor capture reveals a common cause.
    Hunt AR; von Mühlenen A; Kingstone A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Apr; 33(2):271-84. PubMed ID: 17469968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The attractiveness of salient distractors to reaching movements is task dependent.
    Nissens T; Fiehler K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jul; 82(5):2502-2515. PubMed ID: 32026449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of attention in eye-movement awareness.
    Mahon A; Clarke ADF; Hunt AR
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Oct; 80(7):1691-1704. PubMed ID: 29968082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of eccentricity on attentional capture.
    van Heusden E; Olivers CNL; Donk M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 Feb; 86(2):422-438. PubMed ID: 37258897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A temporal dependency account of attentional inhibition in oculomotor control.
    Weaver MD; van Zoest W; Hickey C
    Neuroimage; 2017 Feb; 147():880-894. PubMed ID: 27836709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of reward on oculomotor control.
    McCoy B; Theeuwes J
    J Neurophysiol; 2016 Nov; 116(5):2453-2466. PubMed ID: 27582294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Trial-by-trial adjustments of top-down set modulate oculomotor capture.
    Moher J; Abrams J; Egeth HE; Yantis S; Stuphorn V
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2011 Oct; 18(5):897-903. PubMed ID: 21691926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pre-stimulus activity predicts the winner of top-down vs. bottom-up attentional selection.
    Mazaheri A; DiQuattro NE; Bengson J; Geng JJ
    PLoS One; 2011 Feb; 6(2):e16243. PubMed ID: 21386896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Oculomotor capture by search-irrelevant features in visual working memory: on the crucial role of target-distractor similarity.
    Foerster RM; Schneider WX
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jul; 82(5):2379-2392. PubMed ID: 32166644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.