These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37795696)

  • 1. Quality of life and sexuality with penile prosthesis: a systematic review and pooled analysis.
    Manfredi C; Russo GI; Capogrosso P; Falcone M; Capece M; Sokolakis I; Verze P; Salonia A; Tsambarlis P; Seligra Lopes L; Romero-Otero J; DE Sio M; Levine L;
    Minerva Urol Nephrol; 2024 Apr; 76(2):166-175. PubMed ID: 37795696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A questionnaire for the evaluation of quality of life after penile prosthesis implant: quality of life and sexuality with penile prosthesis (QoLSPP): to what extent does the implant affect the patient's life?
    Caraceni E; Utizi L
    J Sex Med; 2014 Apr; 11(4):1005-1012. PubMed ID: 24548771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Satisfaction rate at 1-year follow-up in patients treated with penile implants: data from the multicentre prospective registry INSIST-ED.
    Capogrosso P; Pescatori E; Caraceni E; Mondaini N; Utizi L; Cai T; Salonia A; Palmieri A; Deho' F
    BJU Int; 2019 Feb; 123(2):360-366. PubMed ID: 29956870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Absence of a Validated English-Language Survey to Assess Prosthesis Satisfaction: A Prospective Cohort Using the Sexual Quality of Life After Penile Prosthesis.
    Carlos EC; Nosé BD; Barton GJ; Davis L; Lentz AC
    J Sex Med; 2020 Nov; 17(11):2307-2310. PubMed ID: 32811792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Long-Term Follow-Up After Penile Prosthesis Implantation-Survival and Quality of Life Outcomes.
    Chierigo F; Capogrosso P; Dehò F; Pozzi E; Schifano N; Belladelli F; Montorsi F; Salonia A
    J Sex Med; 2019 Nov; 16(11):1827-1833. PubMed ID: 31501062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mid-term outcomes of minimally invasive infrapubic approach for inflatable penile prosthesis implantation: A single-center study and literature review.
    Di Pierro GB; Di Lascio G; Lemma A; Grande P; Frisenda M; Del Giudice F; Antonini G; Nardi F; De Berardinis E; Cristini C; Franco G; Sciarra A; Salciccia S
    Andrology; 2024 Mar; 12(3):624-632. PubMed ID: 37452742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Penoscrotal versus minimally invasive infrapubic approach for inflatable penile prosthesis placement: a single-center matched-pair analysis.
    Grande P; Antonini G; Cristini C; De Berardinis E; Gatto A; Di Lascio G; Lemma A; Gentile G; Di Pierro GB
    World J Urol; 2018 Jul; 36(7):1167-1174. PubMed ID: 29492584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Satisfaction rates of inflatable penile prosthesis in men who have sex with men are high.
    La J; Loeb CA; Barham DW; Miller J; Chung E; Gross MS; Hatzichristodoulou G; Park SH; Perito PE; Suarez-Sarmiento A; Van Renterghem K; Yafi FA
    Int J Impot Res; 2023 Sep; 35(6):564-568. PubMed ID: 35941220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Primary versus revision implant for inflatable penile prosthesis: A propensity score-matched comparison.
    Di Pierro GB; Lemma A; Di Lascio G; El Motassime A; Grande P; Di Giulio I; Salciccia S; Maggi M; Antonini G; De Berardinis E; Cristini C; Sciarra A
    Andrologia; 2021 Dec; 53(11):e14240. PubMed ID: 34498769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Which patient may benefit the most from penile prosthesis implantation?
    La Croce G; Schifano N; Pescatori E; Caraceni E; Colombo F; Bettocchi C; Carrino M; Vitarelli A; Pozza D; Fiordelise S; Varvello F; Paradiso M; Silvani M; Mondaini N; Natali A; Falcone M; Ceruti C; Salonia A; Antonini G; Cai T; Palmieri A; Dehò F; Capogrosso P
    Andrology; 2022 Nov; 10(8):1567-1574. PubMed ID: 36088578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of Quality of Life After Inflatable Penile Implantation and Analysis of Factors Influencing Postsurgery Patient Satisfaction.
    Luna E; Rodriguez D; Barrios D; Hernandez H; Bianco F; Gheiler E
    J Sex Med; 2022 Sep; 19(9):1472-1478. PubMed ID: 35933304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sexual Quality of Life and Satisfaction With Penile Prostheses.
    Barton GJ; Carlos EC; Lentz AC
    Sex Med Rev; 2019 Jan; 7(1):178-188. PubMed ID: 30503794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Rise of the Neophallus: A Systematic Review of Penile Prosthetic Outcomes and Complications in Gender-Affirming Surgery.
    Rooker SA; Vyas KS; DiFilippo EC; Nolan IT; Morrison SD; Santucci RA
    J Sex Med; 2019 May; 16(5):661-672. PubMed ID: 30956105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Penile Implant Surgery Satisfaction Assessment.
    Manfredi C; Fortier É; Faix A; Martínez-Salamanca JI
    J Sex Med; 2021 May; 18(5):868-874. PubMed ID: 33903044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Penile Prosthesis Implantation Combined With Grafting Techniques in Patients With Peyronie's Disease and Erectile Dysfunction: A Systematic Review.
    Sokolakis I; Pyrgidis N; Ziegelmann MJ; Mykoniatis I; Köhler TS; Hatzichristodoulou G
    Sex Med Rev; 2022 Jul; 10(3):451-459. PubMed ID: 34219005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Systematic Review of Partner Satisfaction After Penile Prosthesis with Special Emphasis on LGBTQ + Populations.
    Singh A; Cooper CA; Hou SW; Raheem OA
    Curr Urol Rep; 2023 Feb; 24(2):105-115. PubMed ID: 36670232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Long-Term Results and Couples' Satisfaction with Penile Implant Types and Brands: Lessons Learned From 883 Patients With Erectile Dysfunction Who Underwent Penile Prosthesis Implantation.
    Çayan S; Aşcı R; Efesoy O; Bolat MS; Akbay E; Yaman Ö
    J Sex Med; 2019 Jul; 16(7):1092-1099. PubMed ID: 31155387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Efficacy and patient satisfaction associated with penile prosthesis revision surgery.
    Kava BR; Yang Y; Soloway CT
    J Sex Med; 2007 Mar; 4(2):509-18. PubMed ID: 17087801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Initial experience of a single center with the use of ZSI 475 penile prosthesis.
    Colombo F; Gentile G; Vagnoni V; Fiorillo A; Piazza P; Sartorio F; Franceschelli A
    Asian J Urol; 2021 Apr; 8(2):176-182. PubMed ID: 33996473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.