122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37795762)
1. Assessment of protein-ligand complexes in CASP15.
Robin X; Studer G; Durairaj J; Eberhardt J; Schwede T; Walters WP
Proteins; 2023 Dec; 91(12):1811-1821. PubMed ID: 37795762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. zPoseScore model for accurate and robust protein-ligand docking pose scoring in CASP15.
Shen T; Liu F; Wang Z; Sun J; Bu Y; Meng J; Chen W; Yao K; Mu Y; Li W; Zhao G; Wang S; Wei Y; Zheng L
Proteins; 2023 Dec; 91(12):1837-1849. PubMed ID: 37606194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prospective evaluation of shape similarity based pose prediction method in D3R Grand Challenge 2015.
Kumar A; Zhang KY
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):685-693. PubMed ID: 27484214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Template-guided method for protein-ligand complex structure prediction: Application to CASP15 protein-ligand studies.
Xu X; Duan R; Zou X
Proteins; 2023 Dec; 91(12):1829-1836. PubMed ID: 37283068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Statistical potential for modeling and ranking of protein-ligand interactions.
Fan H; Schneidman-Duhovny D; Irwin JJ; Dong G; Shoichet BK; Sali A
J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Dec; 51(12):3078-92. PubMed ID: 22014038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. DrugScore(CSD)-knowledge-based scoring function derived from small molecule crystal data with superior recognition rate of near-native ligand poses and better affinity prediction.
Velec HF; Gohlke H; Klebe G
J Med Chem; 2005 Oct; 48(20):6296-303. PubMed ID: 16190756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Automated benchmarking of combined protein structure and ligand conformation prediction.
Leemann M; Sagasta A; Eberhardt J; Schwede T; Robin X; Durairaj J
Proteins; 2023 Dec; 91(12):1912-1924. PubMed ID: 37885318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improved pose and affinity predictions using different protocols tailored on the basis of data availability.
Prathipati P; Nagao C; Ahmad S; Mizuguchi K
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):817-828. PubMed ID: 27714493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of three-dimensional RNA structure prediction in CASP15.
Das R; Kretsch RC; Simpkin AJ; Mulvaney T; Pham P; Rangan R; Bu F; Keegan RM; Topf M; Rigden DJ; Miao Z; Westhof E
Proteins; 2023 Dec; 91(12):1747-1770. PubMed ID: 37876231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of three-dimensional RNA structure prediction in CASP15.
Das R; Kretsch RC; Simpkin AJ; Mulvaney T; Pham P; Rangan R; Bu F; Keegan RM; Topf M; Rigden DJ; Miao Z; Westhof E
bioRxiv; 2023 Oct; ():. PubMed ID: 37162955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Protein target highlights in CASP15: Analysis of models by structure providers.
Alexander LT; Durairaj J; Kryshtafovych A; Abriata LA; Bayo Y; Bhabha G; Breyton C; Caulton SG; Chen J; Degroux S; Ekiert DC; Erlandsen BS; Freddolino PL; Gilzer D; Greening C; Grimes JM; Grinter R; Gurusaran M; Hartmann MD; Hitchman CJ; Keown JR; Kropp A; Kursula P; Lovering AL; Lemaitre B; Lia A; Liu S; Logotheti M; Lu S; Markússon S; Miller MD; Minasov G; Niemann HH; Opazo F; Phillips GN; Davies OR; Rommelaere S; Rosas-Lemus M; Roversi P; Satchell K; Smith N; Wilson MA; Wu KL; Xia X; Xiao H; Zhang W; Zhou ZH; Fidelis K; Topf M; Moult J; Schwede T
Proteins; 2023 Dec; 91(12):1571-1599. PubMed ID: 37493353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Lessons in molecular recognition: the effects of ligand and protein flexibility on molecular docking accuracy.
Erickson JA; Jalaie M; Robertson DH; Lewis RA; Vieth M
J Med Chem; 2004 Jan; 47(1):45-55. PubMed ID: 14695819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. CASP15 cryoEM protein and RNA targets: refinement and analysis using experimental maps.
Mulvaney T; Kretsch RC; Elliott L; Beton J; Kryshtafovych A; Rigden DJ; Das R; Topf M
bioRxiv; 2023 Aug; ():. PubMed ID: 37609268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Supramolecular architectures in Co(II) and Cu(II) complexes with thiophene-2-carboxylate and 2-amino-4,6-dimethoxypyrimidine ligands.
Karthikeyan A; Thomas Muthiah P; Perdih F
Acta Crystallogr C Struct Chem; 2016 May; 72(Pt 5):442-50. PubMed ID: 27146575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Docking to RNA via root-mean-square-deviation-driven energy minimization with flexible ligands and flexible targets.
Guilbert C; James TL
J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Jun; 48(6):1257-68. PubMed ID: 18510306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. DOX: A new computational protocol for accurate prediction of the protein-ligand binding structures.
Rao L; Chi B; Ren Y; Li Y; Xu X; Wan J
J Comput Chem; 2016 Jan; 37(3):336-44. PubMed ID: 26459237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. New prediction categories in CASP15.
Kryshtafovych A; Antczak M; Szachniuk M; Zok T; Kretsch RC; Rangan R; Pham P; Das R; Robin X; Studer G; Durairaj J; Eberhardt J; Sweeney A; Topf M; Schwede T; Fidelis K; Moult J
Proteins; 2023 Dec; 91(12):1550-1557. PubMed ID: 37306011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. FunFOLDQA: a quality assessment tool for protein-ligand binding site residue predictions.
Roche DB; Buenavista MT; McGuffin LJ
PLoS One; 2012; 7(5):e38219. PubMed ID: 22666491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Simple, intuitive calculations of free energy of binding for protein-ligand complexes. 1. Models without explicit constrained water.
Cozzini P; Fornabaio M; Marabotti A; Abraham DJ; Kellogg GE; Mozzarelli A
J Med Chem; 2002 Jun; 45(12):2469-83. PubMed ID: 12036355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Blind prediction of charged ligand binding affinities in a model binding site.
Rocklin GJ; Boyce SE; Fischer M; Fish I; Mobley DL; Shoichet BK; Dill KA
J Mol Biol; 2013 Nov; 425(22):4569-83. PubMed ID: 23896298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
