BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

380 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37796283)

  • 1. Quantitative computed tomography has higher sensitivity detecting critical bone mineral density compared to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in postmenopausal women and elderly men with osteoporotic fractures: a real-life study.
    Boehm E; Kraft E; Biebl JT; Wegener B; Stahl R; Feist-Pagenstert I
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2024 Jan; 144(1):179-188. PubMed ID: 37796283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Discordance in lumbar bone mineral density measurements by quantitative computed tomography and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in postmenopausal women: a prospective comparative study.
    Lin W; He C; Xie F; Chen T; Zheng G; Yin H; Chen H; Wang Z
    Spine J; 2023 Feb; 23(2):295-304. PubMed ID: 36343911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Vertebral bone attenuation on low-dose chest CT: quantitative volumetric analysis for bone fragility assessment.
    Kim YW; Kim JH; Yoon SH; Lee JH; Lee CH; Shin CS; Park YS
    Osteoporos Int; 2017 Jan; 28(1):329-338. PubMed ID: 27480628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of bone density using the 1.5 T or 3.0 T MRI-based vertebral bone quality score in older patients undergoing spine surgery: does field strength matter?
    Lin W; He C; Xie F; Chen T; Zheng G; Yin H; Chen H; Wang Z
    Spine J; 2023 Aug; 23(8):1172-1181. PubMed ID: 37031891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Thoracic Quantitative Computed Tomography (QCT) Can Sensitively Monitor Bone Mineral Metabolism: Comparison of Thoracic QCT vs Lumbar QCT and Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry in Detection of Age-relative Change in Bone Mineral Density.
    Mao SS; Li D; Syed YS; Gao Y; Luo Y; Flores F; Child J; Cervantes M; Kalantar-Zadeh K; Budoff MJ
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Dec; 24(12):1582-1587. PubMed ID: 28844601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Preoperative MRI-based vertebral bone quality (VBQ) score assessment in patients undergoing lumbar spinal fusion.
    Salzmann SN; Okano I; Jones C; Zhu J; Lu S; Onyekwere I; Balaji V; Reisener MJ; Chiapparelli E; Shue J; Carrino JA; Girardi FP; Cammisa FP; Sama AA; Hughes AP
    Spine J; 2022 Aug; 22(8):1301-1308. PubMed ID: 35342015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Opportunistic QCT Bone Mineral Density Measurements Predicting Osteoporotic Fractures: A Use Case in a Prospective Clinical Cohort.
    Leonhardt Y; May P; Gordijenko O; Koeppen-Ursic VA; Brandhorst H; Zimmer C; Makowski MR; Baum T; Kirschke JS; Gersing AS; Seifert-Klauss V; Schwaiger BJ
    Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2020; 11():586352. PubMed ID: 33240220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improved prediction of incident vertebral fractures using opportunistic QCT compared to DXA.
    Löffler MT; Jacob A; Valentinitsch A; Rienmüller A; Zimmer C; Ryang YM; Baum T; Kirschke JS
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Sep; 29(9):4980-4989. PubMed ID: 30790025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Simultaneous screening for osteoporosis at CT colonography: bone mineral density assessment using MDCT attenuation techniques compared with the DXA reference standard.
    Pickhardt PJ; Lee LJ; del Rio AM; Lauder T; Bruce RJ; Summers RM; Pooler BD; Binkley N
    J Bone Miner Res; 2011 Sep; 26(9):2194-203. PubMed ID: 21590738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparisons of noninvasive bone mineral measurements in assessing age-related loss, fracture discrimination, and diagnostic classification.
    Grampp S; Genant HK; Mathur A; Lang P; Jergas M; Takada M; Glüer CC; Lu Y; Chavez M
    J Bone Miner Res; 1997 May; 12(5):697-711. PubMed ID: 9144335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantitative CT screening improved lumbar BMD evaluation in older patients compared to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
    Lin W; He C; Xie F; Chen T; Zheng G; Yin H; Chen H; Wang Z
    BMC Geriatr; 2023 Apr; 23(1):231. PubMed ID: 37069511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimates of volumetric bone density from projectional measurements improve the discriminatory capability of dual X-ray absorptiometry.
    Jergas M; Breitenseher M; Glüer CC; Yu W; Genant HK
    J Bone Miner Res; 1995 Jul; 10(7):1101-10. PubMed ID: 7484286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Performance of iCare quantitative computed tomography in bone mineral density assessment of the hip and vertebral bodies in European spine phantom.
    Liu F; Zhu H; Ma J; Miao L; Chen S; Yin Z; Wang H
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2023 Oct; 18(1):777. PubMed ID: 37845720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantitative computed tomography discriminates between postmenopausal women with low spine bone mineral density with vertebral fractures and those with low spine bone mineral density only: the SHATTER study.
    Paggiosi MA; Debono M; Walsh JS; Peel NFA; Eastell R
    Osteoporos Int; 2020 Apr; 31(4):667-675. PubMed ID: 31993717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The correlation between osteoporotic vertebrae fracture risk and bone mineral density measured by quantitative computed tomography and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Chen L; Wu XY; Jin Q; Chen GY; Ma X
    Eur Spine J; 2023 Nov; 32(11):3875-3884. PubMed ID: 37740786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Diagnostic accuracy of quantitative dual-energy CT-based volumetric bone mineral density assessment for the prediction of osteoporosis-associated fractures.
    Gruenewald LD; Koch V; Martin SS; Yel I; Eichler K; Gruber-Rouh T; Lenga L; Wichmann JL; Alizadeh LS; Albrecht MH; Mader C; Huizinga NA; D'Angelo T; Mazziotti S; Wesarg S; Vogl TJ; Booz C
    Eur Radiol; 2022 May; 32(5):3076-3084. PubMed ID: 34713330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of peripheral quantitative computed tomography forearm bone density versus DXA in rheumatoid arthritis patients and controls.
    Juhász B; Gulyás K; Horváth Á; Pethő Z; Bhattoa HP; Váncsa A; Szekanecz É; Horváth C; Kocsis J; Horváth Z; Hodosi K; Szántó S; Szűcs G; Szekanecz Z
    Osteoporos Int; 2017 Apr; 28(4):1271-1277. PubMed ID: 27942777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantitative computed tomography (QCT) of the forearm using general purpose spiral whole-body CT scanners: accuracy, precision and comparison with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).
    Engelke K; Libanati C; Liu Y; Wang H; Austin M; Fuerst T; Stampa B; Timm W; Genant HK
    Bone; 2009 Jul; 45(1):110-8. PubMed ID: 19345291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Utilization of DXA Bone Mineral Densitometry in Ontario: An Evidence-Based Analysis.
    Medical Advisory Secretariat
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2006; 6(20):1-180. PubMed ID: 23074491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Vertebral fracture assessment by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry along with bone mineral density in the evaluation of postmenopausal osteoporosis.
    Shetty S; John B; Mohan S; Paul TV
    Arch Osteoporos; 2020 Feb; 15(1):25. PubMed ID: 32095943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.