143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37796308)
21. Differences in long-term fixation between mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing knee prostheses at ten to 12 years' follow-up: a single-blinded randomised controlled radiostereometric trial.
Pijls BG; Valstar ER; Kaptein BL; Nelissen RG
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Oct; 94(10):1366-71. PubMed ID: 23015562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Mobile-bearing prosthesis suppresses the postoperative rotational mismatch and improves patient-reported outcome measurements better than fixed-bearing prosthesis: rotational analysis by 3D measurement in total knee arthroplasty.
Ueyama H; Minoda Y; Sugama R; Ohta Y; Takemura S; Nakamura H
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2023 Nov; 143(11):6781-6790. PubMed ID: 37418005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Posterior stability in fixed-bearing versus mobile-bearing total knee replacement: a radiological comparison of two implants.
Siebold R; Louisia S; Canty J; Bartlett RJ
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2007 Feb; 127(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 17021758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Mobile-bearing versus fixed-bearing total knee implants. Results of a series of 100 randomised cases after 9 years follow-up.
Poirier N; Graf P; Dubrana F
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2015 Jun; 101(4 Suppl):S187-92. PubMed ID: 25890808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Fixed-bearing versus mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomised, clinical and radiological study with mid-term results at 7 years.
Lädermann A; Lübbeke A; Stern R; Riand N; Fritschy D
Knee; 2008 Jun; 15(3):206-10. PubMed ID: 18329883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Low polyethylene creep and wear following mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee replacement.
Ghosh P; Mohammad HR; Martin B; Campi S; Murray DW; Mellon SJ
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2021 Oct; 29(10):3433-3442. PubMed ID: 32940731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Joint awareness after fixed and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty with minimum 12 years of follow-up: A propensity matched-pair analysis.
Bakircioglu S; Aksoy T; Caglar O; Mazhar Tokgozoglu A; Atilla B
Knee; 2023 Jun; 42():130-135. PubMed ID: 37001329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Mobile and fixed-bearing (all-polyethylene tibial component) total knee arthroplasty designs: surgical technique.
Luna JT; Sembrano JN; Gioe TJ
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Sep; 92 Suppl 1 Pt 2():240-9. PubMed ID: 20844179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. P.F.C Sigma
Riaz O; Aqil A; Sisodia G; Chakrabarty G
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2017 Dec; 27(8):1145-1149. PubMed ID: 28210821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of implant position and joint awareness between fixed- and mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a minimum of five year follow-up study.
Kim MS; Koh IJ; Kim CK; Choi KY; Baek JW; In Y
Int Orthop; 2020 Nov; 44(11):2329-2336. PubMed ID: 32577875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A Comparison of Mobile and Fixed-Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty at a Minimum 10-Year Follow-up.
Neufeld ME; Albers A; Greidanus NV; Garbuz DS; Masri BA
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Jun; 33(6):1713-1718. PubMed ID: 29398257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Higher forgotten joint score for fixed-bearing than for mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty.
Thienpont E; Zorman D
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2016 Aug; 24(8):2641-5. PubMed ID: 26037546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Effectiveness comparison of mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing prostheses in total knee arthroplasty for ten years follow-up].
Xu H; Wang C; Zhang H; Wang Y
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Mar; 31(3):271-277. PubMed ID: 29806253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. No difference in patellar position between mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty for medial osteoarthritis: a prospective randomized study.
Sappey-Marinier E; de Abreu FGA; O'Loughlin P; Gaillard R; Neyret P; Lustig S; Servien E
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2020 May; 28(5):1542-1550. PubMed ID: 31218390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Measuring polyethylene wear in total knee arthroplasty by RSA: differences between weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing positioning.
van Ijsseldijk EA; Valstar ER; Stoel BC; de Ridder R; Nelissen RG; Kaptein BL
J Orthop Res; 2014 Apr; 32(4):613-7. PubMed ID: 24395396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of in vivo polyethylene wear particles between mobile- and fixed-bearing TKA in the same patients.
Minoda Y; Hata K; Ikebuchi M; Mizokawa S; Ohta Y; Nakamura H
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2017 Sep; 25(9):2887-2893. PubMed ID: 26846659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Survivorship of fixed vs mobile bearing unicompartmental knee replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis of sixty-four studies and National Joint Registries.
Abu Al-Rub Z; Lamb JN; West RM; Yang X; Hu Y; Pandit HG
Knee; 2020 Oct; 27(5):1635-1644. PubMed ID: 33010783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Are There Differences in Micromotion on Radiostereometric Analysis Between Bicruciate and Cruciate-retaining Designs in TKA? A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Troelsen A; Ingelsrud LH; Thomsen MG; Muharemovic O; Otte KS; Husted H
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Sep; 478(9):2045-2053. PubMed ID: 32023233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Fixation of high-flexion total knee prostheses: five-year follow-up results of a four-arm randomized controlled clinical and roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis study.
Nieuwenhuijse MJ; van der Voort P; Kaptein BL; van der Linden-van der Zwaag HM; Valstar ER; Nelissen RG
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Oct; 95(19):e1411-11. PubMed ID: 24088976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Effect of polyethylene conformity on total knee arthroplasty early clinical outcomes.
Indelli PF; Risitano S; Hall KE; Leonardi E; Migliore E
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2019 Apr; 27(4):1028-1034. PubMed ID: 30328496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
