165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37796419)
61. DuoStim: a new option for fertility preservation for a woman with Turner syndrome.
Ito A; Katagiri Y; Tamaki Y; Fukuda Y; Oji A; Morita M
Gynecol Endocrinol; 2020 Dec; 36(12):1144-1148. PubMed ID: 32945708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. New trends in female fertility preservation: in vitro maturation of oocytes.
Berwanger AL; Finet A; El Hachem H; le Parco S; Hesters L; Grynberg M
Future Oncol; 2012 Dec; 8(12):1567-73. PubMed ID: 23231518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Ovarian reserve and response to stimulation in women undergoing fertility preservation according to malignancy type.
Lefebvre T; Mirallié S; Leperlier F; Reignier A; Barrière P; Fréour T
Reprod Biomed Online; 2018 Aug; 37(2):201-207. PubMed ID: 29784618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Timing should no longer be an obstacle to oocyte cryopreservation in patients with cancer.
Mangili G; Papaleo E; Sigismondi C; Masciangelo R; Sarais V; Giorgione V; Nale R; Privitera L; Carnelli L; Di Mattei V; Candiani M
Tumori; 2017 Mar; 103(2):182-186. PubMed ID: 28009430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation in women with cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing random and conventional starts.
Alexander VM; Martin CE; Schelble AP; Laufer AB; Hardi A; McKenzie LJ; Hipp HS; Kawwass JF; Spencer JB; Jungheim ES
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2021 Oct; 50(8):102080. PubMed ID: 33545413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Fertility preservation options in breast cancer patients.
Kasum M; von Wolff M; Franulić D; Čehić E; Klepac-Pulanić T; Orešković S; Juras J
Gynecol Endocrinol; 2015; 31(11):846-51. PubMed ID: 26370157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Ovarian tissue cryopreservation and transplantation among alternatives for fertility preservation in the Nordic countries - compilation of 20 years of multicenter experience.
Rodriguez-Wallberg KA; Tanbo T; Tinkanen H; Thurin-Kjellberg A; Nedstrand E; Kitlinski ML; Macklon KT; Ernst E; Fedder J; Tiitinen A; Morin-Papunen L; Einarsson S; Jokimaa V; Hippeläinen M; Lood M; Gudmundsson J; Olofsson JI; Andersen CY
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2016 Sep; 95(9):1015-26. PubMed ID: 27258933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Tamoxifen co-administration during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for in vitro fertilization in breast cancer patients increases the safety of fertility-preservation treatment strategies.
Meirow D; Raanani H; Maman E; Paluch-Shimon S; Shapira M; Cohen Y; Kuchuk I; Hourvitz A; Levron J; Mozer-Mendel M; Brengauz M; Biderman H; Manela D; Catane R; Dor J; Orvieto R; Kaufman B
Fertil Steril; 2014 Aug; 102(2):488-495.e3. PubMed ID: 24934489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Fertility preservation for women with breast cancer: a multicentre randomized controlled trial on various ovarian stimulation protocols.
Balkenende EME; Dahhan T; Beerendonk CCM; Fleischer K; Stoop D; Bos AME; Lambalk CB; Schats R; Smeenk JMJ; Louwé LA; Cantineau AEP; de Bruin JP; Linn SC; van der Veen F; van Wely M; Goddijn M
Hum Reprod; 2022 Jul; 37(8):1786-1794. PubMed ID: 35776109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Outcome of ovarian stimulation for oocyte cryopreservation in women with Turner syndrome.
Talaulikar VS; Conway GS; Pimblett A; Davies MC
Fertil Steril; 2019 Mar; 111(3):505-509. PubMed ID: 30598170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Long-term follow-up to assess criteria for ovarian tissue cryopreservation for fertility preservation in young women and girls with cancer.
Duffin K; Howie R; Kelsey TW; Wallace HB; Anderson RA
Hum Reprod; 2023 Jun; 38(6):1076-1085. PubMed ID: 37011633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Different stimulation protocols for oocyte cryropreservation in oncological patients: a retrospective analysis of single university centre.
Simi G; Obino ME; Casarosa E; Litta P; Artini PG; Cela V
Gynecol Endocrinol; 2015; 31(12):966-70. PubMed ID: 26370262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Beyond fertility preservation: role of the oncofertility unit in the reproductive and gynecological follow-up of young cancer patients.
Massarotti C; Scaruffi P; Lambertini M; Sozzi F; Remorgida V; Anserini P
Hum Reprod; 2019 Aug; 34(8):1462-1469. PubMed ID: 31339999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. The indication for fertility preservation in women with Turner syndrome should not only be based on the ovarian reserve but also on the genotype and expected future health status.
Nawroth F; Schüring AN; von Wolff M
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2020 Dec; 99(12):1579-1583. PubMed ID: 32860418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Ovarian response to controlled ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation before oncology treatment: A retrospective cohort of 157 patients.
Tsampras N; Roberts SA; Gould D; Fitzgerald CT
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2018 Mar; 27(2):e12797. PubMed ID: 29168588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Ovarian response after random-start controlled ovarian stimulation to cryopreserve oocytes in cancer patients.
Campos APC; Geber GP; Hurtado R; Sampaio M; Geber S
JBRA Assist Reprod; 2018 Nov; 22(4):352-354. PubMed ID: 30264947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. A prospective case series of women with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: levels of tamoxifen metabolites in controlled ovarian stimulation with high-dose tamoxifen.
Balkenende EM; Dahhan T; Linn SC; Jager NG; Beijnen JH; Goddijn M
Hum Reprod; 2013 Apr; 28(4):953-9. PubMed ID: 23335608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Emergency IVF for embryo freezing to preserve female fertility: a French multicentre cohort study.
Courbiere B; Decanter C; Bringer-Deutsch S; Rives N; Mirallié S; Pech JC; De Ziegler D; Carré-Pigeon F; May-Panloup P; Sifer C; Amice V; Schweitzer T; Porcu-Buisson G; Poirot C;
Hum Reprod; 2013 Sep; 28(9):2381-8. PubMed ID: 23832792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Optimal timing to retrieve oocytes for fertility preservation in patients with acute myeloid leukemia: two cases of controlled ovarian stimulation using DuoStim with a literature review.
Sekiguchi M; Ito A; Fukuda Y; Yoneyama M; Furui M; Nakaoka K; Umemura N; Hayashi Y; Tamaki Y; Katagiri Y; Nakata M
Gynecol Endocrinol; 2023 Dec; 39(1):2217262. PubMed ID: 37271166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Bypassing physiological puberty, a novel procedure of oocyte cryopreservation at age 7: a case report and review of the literature.
Azem F; Brener A; Malinger G; Reches A; Many A; Yogev Y; Lebenthal Y
Fertil Steril; 2020 Aug; 114(2):374-378. PubMed ID: 32386868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
