140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37797495)
1. Factors affecting the accuracy of genomic prediction in joint pig populations.
Zhao W; Zhang Z; Wang Z; Ma P; Pan Y; Wang Q; Zhang Z
Animal; 2023 Oct; 17(10):100980. PubMed ID: 37797495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of high-density genotypic data and different methods on joint genomic prediction: A case study in large white pigs.
Zhao W; Zhang Z; Ma P; Wang Z; Wang Q; Zhang Z; Pan Y
Anim Genet; 2023 Feb; 54(1):45-54. PubMed ID: 36414135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Using selection index theory to estimate consistency of multi-locus linkage disequilibrium across populations.
Wientjes YC; Veerkamp RF; Calus MP
BMC Genet; 2015 Jul; 16():87. PubMed ID: 26187501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Expanding the application of haplotype-based genomic predictions to the wild: A case of antibody response against Teladorsagia circumcincta in Soay sheep.
Vahedi SM; Salek Ardetani S; Brito LF; Karimi K; Pahlavan Afshari K; Banabazi MH
BMC Genomics; 2023 Jun; 24(1):335. PubMed ID: 37330501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Empirical and deterministic accuracies of across-population genomic prediction.
Wientjes YC; Veerkamp RF; Bijma P; Bovenhuis H; Schrooten C; Calus MP
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Feb; 47(1):5. PubMed ID: 25885467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of Genomic Prediction in Synthetic Populations Depending on the Number of Parents, Relatedness, and Ancestral Linkage Disequilibrium.
Schopp P; Müller D; Technow F; Melchinger AE
Genetics; 2017 Jan; 205(1):441-454. PubMed ID: 28049710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Improving Genomic Predictions in Multi-Breed Cattle Populations: A Comparative Analysis of BayesR and GBLUP Models.
Ma H; Li H; Ge F; Zhao H; Zhu B; Zhang L; Gao H; Xu L; Li J; Wang Z
Genes (Basel); 2024 Feb; 15(2):. PubMed ID: 38397242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Using markers with large effect in genetic and genomic predictions.
Lopes MS; Bovenhuis H; van Son M; Nordbø Ø; Grindflek EH; Knol EF; Bastiaansen JW
J Anim Sci; 2017 Jan; 95(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 28177367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of QTL properties on the accuracy of multi-breed genomic prediction.
Wientjes YC; Calus MP; Goddard ME; Hayes BJ
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 May; 47(1):42. PubMed ID: 25951906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Genomic best linear unbiased prediction method reflecting the degree of linkage disequilibrium.
Nishio M; Satoh M
J Anim Breed Genet; 2015 Oct; 132(5):357-65. PubMed ID: 25866073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Using genomic selection to improve the accuracy of genomic prediction for multi-populations in pigs.
Yin C; Zhou P; Wang Y; Yin Z; Liu Y
Animal; 2024 Feb; 18(2):101062. PubMed ID: 38211414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Random forest estimation of genomic breeding values for disease susceptibility over different disease incidences and genomic architectures in simulated cow calibration groups.
Naderi S; Yin T; König S
J Dairy Sci; 2016 Sep; 99(9):7261-7273. PubMed ID: 27344385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Genomic Prediction Using Multi-trait Weighted GBLUP Accounting for Heterogeneous Variances and Covariances Across the Genome.
Karaman E; Lund MS; Anche MT; Janss L; Su G
G3 (Bethesda); 2018 Nov; 8(11):3549-3558. PubMed ID: 30194089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Predictive ability of multi-population genomic prediction methods of phenotypes for reproduction traits in Chinese and Austrian pigs.
Wang X; Zhang Z; Du H; Pfeiffer C; Mészáros G; Ding X
Genet Sel Evol; 2024 Jun; 56(1):49. PubMed ID: 38926647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Using imputation-based whole-genome sequencing data to improve the accuracy of genomic prediction for combined populations in pigs.
Song H; Ye S; Jiang Y; Zhang Z; Zhang Q; Ding X
Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Oct; 51(1):58. PubMed ID: 31638889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Across population genomic prediction scenarios in which Bayesian variable selection outperforms GBLUP.
van den Berg S; Calus MP; Meuwissen TH; Wientjes YC
BMC Genet; 2015 Dec; 16():146. PubMed ID: 26698836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Genomic best linear unbiased prediction method including imprinting effects for genomic evaluation.
Nishio M; Satoh M
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Apr; 47(1):32. PubMed ID: 25928098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Genomic prediction based on preselected single-nucleotide polymorphisms from genome-wide association study and imputed whole-genome sequence data annotation for growth traits in Duroc pigs.
Zhang Y; Zhuang Z; Liu Y; Huang J; Luan M; Zhao X; Dong L; Ye J; Yang M; Zheng E; Cai G; Wu Z; Yang J
Evol Appl; 2024 Feb; 17(2):e13651. PubMed ID: 38362509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Genomic evaluation and genome-wide association studies for total number of teats in a combined American and Danish Yorkshire pig populations selected in China.
Fang F; Li J; Guo M; Mei Q; Yu M; Liu H; Legarra A; Xiang T
J Anim Sci; 2022 Jul; 100(7):. PubMed ID: 35553682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dissimilarity based Partial Least Squares (DPLS) for genomic prediction from SNPs.
Singh P; Engel J; Jansen J; de Haan J; Buydens LM
BMC Genomics; 2016 May; 17():324. PubMed ID: 27142305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
