123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37797652)
1. Microdosimetry-based investigation of biological effectiveness of
Chattaraj A; Selvam TP
Phys Med Biol; 2023 Nov; 68(22):. PubMed ID: 37797652
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of 126 MeV antiproton and proton-a FLUKA-based microdosimetric approach.
Chattaraj A; Selvam TP
Phys Med Biol; 2022 Sep; 67(18):. PubMed ID: 35947988
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Integrating microdosimetric
Cartechini G; Missiaggia M; Scifoni E; La Tessa C; Cordoni FG
Phys Med Biol; 2024 Feb; 69(4):. PubMed ID: 38211313
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Calculation of biological effectiveness of SOBP proton beams: a TOPAS Monte Carlo study.
Chattaraj A; Selvam TP
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2024 Mar; 10(3):. PubMed ID: 38377599
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Microdosimetry-based relative biological effectiveness calculations for radiotherapeutic electron beams: a FLUKA-based study.
Chattaraj A; Selvam TP
Radiol Phys Technol; 2021 Sep; 14(3):297-308. PubMed ID: 34216005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. MONTE CARLO-BASED INVESTIGATION OF MICRODOSIMETRIC DISTRIBUTION OF HIGH ENERGY BRACHYTHERAPY SOURCES.
Chattaraj A; Selvam TP; Datta D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Dec; 187(1):115-128. PubMed ID: 31165891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Radiobiological impact of gadolinium neutron capture from proton therapy and alternative neutron sources using TOPAS-nBio.
Van Delinder KW; Khan R; Gräfe JL
Med Phys; 2021 Jul; 48(7):4004-4016. PubMed ID: 33959981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Microdosimetric investigation of the radiation quality of low-medium energy electrons using Geant4-DNA.
Kyriakou I; Tremi I; Georgakilas AG; Emfietzoglou D
Appl Radiat Isot; 2021 Jun; 172():109654. PubMed ID: 33676082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Microdosimetric characterization of a clinical proton therapy beam: comparison between simulated lineal energy distributions in spherical water targets and experimental measurements with a silicon detector.
Parisi A; Olko P; Swakoń J; Horwacik T; Jabłoński H; Malinowski L; Nowak T; Struelens L; Vanhavere F
Phys Med Biol; 2022 Jan; 67(1):. PubMed ID: 34933289
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Microdosimetric Evaluation of Current and Alternative Brachytherapy Sources-A Geant4-DNA Simulation Study.
Famulari G; Pater P; Enger SA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2018 Jan; 100(1):270-277. PubMed ID: 29102279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The microdosimetric extension in TOPAS: development and comparison with published data.
Zhu H; Chen Y; Sung W; McNamara AL; Tran LT; Burigo LN; Rosenfeld AB; Li J; Faddegon B; Schuemann J; Paganetti H
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Jul; 64(14):145004. PubMed ID: 31117056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Maximum RBE change in
Nusrat H; Karim-Picco S; Pang G; Paudel M; Sarfehnia A
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2020 Jan; 6(1):015021. PubMed ID: 33438609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. TOPAS simulations of the response of a mini-TEPC: benchmark with experimental data.
Bianchi A; Selva A; Reniers B; Vanhavere F; Conte V
Phys Med Biol; 2023 Jan; 68(3):. PubMed ID: 36595254
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Microdosimetric evaluation of relative biological effectiveness for 103Pd, 125I, 241Am, and 192Ir brachytherapy sources.
Wuu CS; Kliauga P; Zaider M; Amols HI
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1996 Oct; 36(3):689-97. PubMed ID: 8948355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Monte Carlo study of the relative biological effectiveness in surface brachytherapy.
Valdes-Cortez C; Niatsetski Y; Perez-Calatayud J; Ballester F; Vijande J
Med Phys; 2022 Aug; 49(8):5576-5588. PubMed ID: 35644023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Interaction between the biological effects of high- and low-LET radiation dose components in a mixed field exposure.
Mason AJ; Giusti V; Green S; Munck af Rosenschöld P; Beynon TD; Hopewell JW
Int J Radiat Biol; 2011 Dec; 87(12):1162-72. PubMed ID: 21923301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Investigation of In-Field and Out-of-Field Radiation Quality With Microdosimetry and Its Impact on Relative Biological Effectiveness in Proton Therapy.
Missiaggia M; Cartechini G; Tommasino F; Scifoni E; La Tessa C
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2023 Apr; 115(5):1269-1282. PubMed ID: 36442542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Calculated microdosimetric characteristics of 125I and 103Pd brachytherapy seeds at different depths in water.
Wuu CS; Chen J
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 122(1-4):506-8. PubMed ID: 17189276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improvement of the hybrid approach between Monte Carlo simulation and analytical function for calculating microdosimetric probability densities in macroscopic matter.
Sato T; Matsuya Y; Ogawa T; Kai T; Hirata Y; Tsuda S; Parisi A
Phys Med Biol; 2023 Jul; 68(15):. PubMed ID: 37352865
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Estimations of relative biological effectiveness of secondary fragments in carbon ion irradiation of water using CR-39 plastic detector and microdosimetric kinetic model.
Hirano Y; Kodaira S; Souda H; Osaki K; Torikoshi M
Med Phys; 2020 Feb; 47(2):781-789. PubMed ID: 31705815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
