These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37797842)

  • 1. Patient expectations impact patient-reported outcomes and satisfaction after lumbar fusion.
    Zhang H; Glassman SD; Bisson EF; Potts EA; Jazini E; Carreon LY
    Spine J; 2024 Feb; 24(2):273-277. PubMed ID: 37797842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Effect of the Severity of Preoperative Disability on Patient-Reported Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Jacob KC; Patel MR; Collins AP; Ribot MA; Pawlowski H; Prabhu MC; Vanjani NN; Singh K
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Mar; 159():e334-e346. PubMed ID: 34942388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. High preoperative expectations and postoperative fulfillment of expectations two years after decompression alone and decompression plus fusion for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis.
    Duculan R; Fong AM; Cammisa FP; Sama AA; Hughes AP; Lebl DR; Mancuso CA; Girardi FP
    Spine J; 2023 May; 23(5):665-674. PubMed ID: 36642255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Women fare best following surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a comparison of the most and least satisfied patients utilizing data from the Quality Outcomes Database.
    Chan AK; Bisson EF; Bydon M; Glassman SD; Foley KT; Potts EA; Shaffrey CI; Shaffrey ME; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Park P; Fu KM; Slotkin JR; Asher AL; Virk MS; Kerezoudis P; Chotai S; DiGiorgio AM; Chan AY; Haid RW; Mummaneni PV
    Neurosurg Focus; 2018 Jan; 44(1):E3. PubMed ID: 29290130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A novel lumbar total joint replacement may be an improvement over fusion for degenerative lumbar conditions: a comparative analysis of patient-reported outcomes at one year.
    Alex Sielatycki J; Devin CJ; Pennings J; Koscielski M; Metcalf T; Archer KR; Dunn R; Craig Humphreys S; Hodges S
    Spine J; 2021 May; 21(5):829-840. PubMed ID: 33346156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improving postoperative patient reported benefits and satisfaction following spinal fusion with a single preoperative education session.
    Eastwood D; Manson N; Bigney E; Darling M; Richardson E; Paixao R; Underwood T; Ellis K; Abraham E
    Spine J; 2019 May; 19(5):840-845. PubMed ID: 30471460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prognostic factors associated with best outcomes (minimal symptom state) following fusion for lumbar degenerative conditions.
    Crawford CH; Glassman SD; Djurasovic M; Owens RK; Gum JL; Carreon LY
    Spine J; 2019 Feb; 19(2):187-190. PubMed ID: 29960112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Revision lumbar fusions have higher rates of reoperation and result in worse clinical outcomes compared to primary lumbar fusions.
    Lambrechts MJ; Toci GR; Siegel N; Karamian BA; Canseco JA; Hilibrand AS; Schroeder GD; Vaccaro AR; Kepler CK
    Spine J; 2023 Jan; 23(1):105-115. PubMed ID: 36064090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Postoperative satisfaction following lumbar spinal fusion surgery: patient expectation versus actuality.
    Yoo JS; Patel DV; Mayo BC; Massel DH; Karmarkar SS; Lamoutte EH; Singh K
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2019 Nov; 31(5):676-682. PubMed ID: 31349221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of preoperative diagnosis on patient satisfaction following lumbar spine surgery.
    Crawford CH; Carreon LY; Bydon M; Asher AL; Glassman SD
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Jun; 26(6):709-715. PubMed ID: 28338454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Effect of the Severity of Preoperative Back Pain on Patient-Reported Outcomes, Recovery Ratios, and Patient Satisfaction Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MIS-TLIF).
    Jacob KC; Patel MR; Parsons AW; Vanjani NN; Pawlowski H; Prabhu MC; Singh K
    World Neurosurg; 2021 Dec; 156():e254-e265. PubMed ID: 34583000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Meeting Patient Expectations and Achieving a Minimal Clinically Important Difference for Back Disability, Back Pain, and Leg Pain May Provide Predictive Utility for Achieving Patient Satisfaction Among Lumbar Decompression Patients.
    Jacob KC; Patel MR; Collins AP; Park GJ; Vanjani NN; Prabhu MC; Pawlowski H; Parsons AW; Singh K
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Jun; 162():e328-e335. PubMed ID: 35259504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Influence of Presenting Physical Function on Postoperative Patient Satisfaction and Clinical Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression.
    Jacob KC; Patel MR; Park GA; Gheewala JR; Vanjani NN; Pawlowski H; Prabhu MC; Singh K
    Clin Spine Surg; 2023 Feb; 36(1):E6-E13. PubMed ID: 35759781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fusion technique does not affect short-term patient-reported outcomes for lumbar degenerative disease.
    Divi SN; Schroeder GD; Goyal DKC; Radcliff KE; Galetta MS; Hilibrand AS; Anderson DG; Kurd MF; Rihn JA; Kaye ID; Woods BR; Vaccaro AR; Kepler CK
    Spine J; 2019 Dec; 19(12):1960-1968. PubMed ID: 31356987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Patient's expectations of surgery for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis: analysis by type of surgery and patient factors from the Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network (CSORN).
    Dandurand C; Urquhart J; Bailey CS; Ailon T; Charest-Morin R; Dea N; Dvorak M; Glennie A; Kwon BK; Paquette S; Rampersaud YR; Street JT; Hounjet C; Mashayekhi MS; Fisher CG
    Spine J; 2023 Jun; 23(6):805-815. PubMed ID: 36764585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Follow-up score, change score or percentage change score for determining clinical important outcome following surgery? An observational study from the Norwegian registry for Spine surgery evaluating patient reported outcome measures in lumbar spinal stenosis and lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis.
    Austevoll IM; Gjestad R; Grotle M; Solberg T; Brox JI; Hermansen E; Rekeland F; Indrekvam K; Storheim K; Hellum C
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Jan; 20(1):31. PubMed ID: 30658613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. MOS short form 36 and Oswestry Disability Index outcomes in lumbar fusion: a multicenter experience.
    Glassman S; Gornet MF; Branch C; Polly D; Peloza J; Schwender JD; Carreon L
    Spine J; 2006; 6(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 16413443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of racial disparities on patient-reported satisfaction and short- and long-term perception of health status after elective lumbar spine surgery.
    Elsamadicy AA; Kemeny H; Adogwa O; Sankey EW; Goodwin CR; Yarbrough CK; Lad SP; Karikari IO; Gottfried ON
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Jul; 29(1):40-45. PubMed ID: 29701564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Patient-reported outcomes after lumbar epidural steroid injection for degenerative spine disease in depressed versus non-depressed patients.
    Kim EJ; Chotai S; Stonko DP; Wick JB; Schneider BJ; McGirt MJ; Devin CJ
    Spine J; 2017 Apr; 17(4):511-517. PubMed ID: 27777051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Achievement of a Minimum Clinically Important Difference for Back Disability Is a Suitable Predictor of Patient Satisfaction Among Lumbar Fusion Patients.
    Geoghegan CE; Mohan S; Cha EDK; Lynch CP; Jadczak CN; Singh K
    World Neurosurg; 2021 Aug; 152():e94-e100. PubMed ID: 34023465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.