207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37798076)
1. Minimally Invasive SI Joint Fusion Procedures for Chronic SI Joint Pain: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Safety and Efficacy.
Whang PG; Patel V; Duhon B; Sturesson B; Cher D; Carlton Reckling W; Capobianco R; Polly D
Int J Spine Surg; 2023 Dec; 17(6):794-808. PubMed ID: 37798076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion for chronic sacroiliac joint pain: a systematic review.
Chang E; Rains C; Ali R; Wines RC; Kahwati LC
Spine J; 2022 Aug; 22(8):1240-1253. PubMed ID: 35017057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A systematic review of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion utilizing a lateral transarticular technique.
Heiney J; Capobianco R; Cher D
Int J Spine Surg; 2015; 9():40. PubMed ID: 26273558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Is the Oswestry Disability Index a valid measure of response to sacroiliac joint treatment?
Copay AG; Cher DJ
Qual Life Res; 2016 Feb; 25(2):283-292. PubMed ID: 26245709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: One Year Clinical and Radiographic Results Following Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Surgery.
Kube RA; Muir JM
Open Orthop J; 2016; 10():679-689. PubMed ID: 28144378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Methodology - Minimally Invasive Compared to Screw-Type Surgeries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Tran ZV; Ivashchenko A; Brooks L
Pain Physician; 2019 Jan; 22(1):29-40. PubMed ID: 30700066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Safety and 6-month effectiveness of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion: a prospective study.
Duhon BS; Cher DJ; Wine KD; Lockstadt H; Kovalsky D; Soo CL
Med Devices (Auckl); 2013; 6():219-29. PubMed ID: 24363562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Safety and Preliminary Effectiveness of Lateral Transiliac Sacroiliac Joint Fusion by Interventional Pain Physicians: A Retrospective Analysis.
Jung MW
J Pain Res; 2024; 17():2147-2153. PubMed ID: 38910592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: A Lateral Approach Using Triangular Titanium Implants and Navigation.
Polly DW; Holton KJ
JBJS Essent Surg Tech; 2020; 10(4):. PubMed ID: 33204578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Using Triangular Titanium versus Cylindrical Threaded Implants: A Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes.
Claus CF; Lytle E; Kaufmann A; Tong D; Bahoura M; Garmo L; Richards B; Soo TM; Houseman C
World Neurosurg; 2020 Jan; 133():e745-e750. PubMed ID: 31605853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion With Decortication: The EVoluSIon Clinical Study.
Kucharzyk D; Colle K; Boone C; Araghi A
Int J Spine Surg; 2022 Feb; 16(1):168-175. PubMed ID: 35217586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stabilization of the sacroiliac joint.
Shaffrey CI; Smith JS
Neurosurg Focus; 2013 Jul; 35(2 Suppl):Editorial. PubMed ID: 23829837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Using Triangular Titanium Implants vs. Non-Surgical Management: Six-Month Outcomes from a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.
Whang P; Cher D; Polly D; Frank C; Lockstadt H; Glaser J; Limoni R; Sembrano J
Int J Spine Surg; 2015; 9():6. PubMed ID: 25785242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Patient-Reported and Radiographic Outcomes After Revision Sacroiliac Joint Fusion.
Thompson JC; Marigi E; Cross WW
Int J Spine Surg; 2023 Apr; 17(2):250-257. PubMed ID: 36754573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Safety Profile of Percutaneous Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion.
Shamrock AG; Patel A; Alam M; Shamrock KH; Al Maaieh M
Global Spine J; 2019 Dec; 9(8):874-880. PubMed ID: 31819854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Two-Year Outcomes from a Randomized Controlled Trial of Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion vs. Non-Surgical Management for Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction.
Polly DW; Swofford J; Whang PG; Frank CJ; Glaser JA; Limoni RP; Cher DJ; Wine KD; Sembrano JN;
Int J Spine Surg; 2016; 10():28. PubMed ID: 27652199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Triangular Titanium Implants for Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: A Prospective Study.
Duhon BS; Cher DJ; Wine KD; Kovalsky DA; Lockstadt H;
Global Spine J; 2016 May; 6(3):257-69. PubMed ID: 27099817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Minimally invasive versus open fusion for Grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database.
Mummaneni PV; Bisson EF; Kerezoudis P; Glassman S; Foley K; Slotkin JR; Potts E; Shaffrey M; Shaffrey CI; Coric D; Knightly J; Park P; Fu KM; Devin CJ; Chotai S; Chan AK; Virk M; Asher AL; Bydon M
Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E11. PubMed ID: 28760035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Five-year clinical and radiographic outcomes after minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion using triangular implants.
Rudolf L; Capobianco R
Open Orthop J; 2014; 8():375-83. PubMed ID: 25352932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Six-month outcomes from a randomized controlled trial of minimally invasive SI joint fusion with triangular titanium implants vs conservative management.
Sturesson B; Kools D; Pflugmacher R; Gasbarrini A; Prestamburgo D; Dengler J
Eur Spine J; 2017 Mar; 26(3):708-719. PubMed ID: 27179664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
