BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37798346)

  • 1. Effects of individual differences in text exposure on sentence comprehension.
    Stoops A; Montag JL
    Sci Rep; 2023 Oct; 13(1):16812. PubMed ID: 37798346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reading span task performance, linguistic experience, and the processing of unexpected syntactic events.
    Farmer TA; Fine AB; Misyak JB; Christiansen MH
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Mar; 70(3):413-433. PubMed ID: 26652283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is sentence ambiguity comprehension affected after mild traumatic brain injury? Results suggest cognitive control is more important than diagnosis.
    Key-DeLyria SE; Rogalski Y; Bodner T; Weichselbaum A
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2022 Sep; 57(5):990-1005. PubMed ID: 35611868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Linguistic rhythm guides parsing decisions in written sentence comprehension.
    Kentner G
    Cognition; 2012 Apr; 123(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 22217385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. When experience meets language statistics: Individual variability in processing English compound words.
    Falkauskas K; Kuperman V
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Nov; 41(6):1607-27. PubMed ID: 26076328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A case for the sentence in reading comprehension.
    Scott CM
    Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch; 2009 Apr; 40(2):184-91. PubMed ID: 18952811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Individual differences in sentence comprehension: a functional magnetic resonance imaging investigation of syntactic and lexical processing demands.
    Prat CS; Keller TA; Just MA
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Dec; 19(12):1950-63. PubMed ID: 17892384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Incidence and Impact of Missing Functional Elements on Information Comprehension using Audio and Text.
    Leroy G; Kauchak D; Kloehn N
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2021; 2021():697-706. PubMed ID: 35309000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Alpha power decreases associated with prediction in written and spoken sentence comprehension.
    León-Cabrera P; Piai V; Morís J; Rodríguez-Fornells A
    Neuropsychologia; 2022 Aug; 173():108286. PubMed ID: 35679987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Probabilistic modeling of discourse-aware sentence processing.
    Dubey A; Keller F; Sturt P
    Top Cogn Sci; 2013 Jul; 5(3):425-51. PubMed ID: 23616488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Combined eye tracking and fMRI reveals neural basis of linguistic predictions during sentence comprehension.
    Bonhage CE; Mueller JL; Friederici AD; Fiebach CJ
    Cortex; 2015 Jul; 68():33-47. PubMed ID: 26003489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A measure of individual differences in readers' approaches to text and its relation to reading experience and reading comprehension.
    Calloway RC; Helder A; Perfetti CA
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Feb; 55(2):899-931. PubMed ID: 35505178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Adult age differences in wrap-up during sentence comprehension: evidence from ex-Gaussian distributional analyses of reading time.
    Payne BR; Stine-Morrow EA
    Psychol Aging; 2014 Jun; 29(2):213-28. PubMed ID: 24955990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Extra-linguistic influences on sentence comprehension in Italian-speaking children with and without specific language impairment.
    Pettenati P; Benassi E; Deevy P; Leonard LB; Caselli MC
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2015; 50(3):312-21. PubMed ID: 25469803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Easy-to-read texts for students with intellectual disability: linguistic factors affecting comprehension.
    Fajardo I; Ávila V; Ferrer A; Tavares G; Gómez M; Hernández A
    J Appl Res Intellect Disabil; 2014 May; 27(3):212-25. PubMed ID: 23813583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Control Engagement During Sentence and Inhibition fMRI Tasks in Children With Reading Difficulties.
    Roe MA; Martinez JE; Mumford JA; Taylor WP; Cirino PT; Fletcher JM; Juranek J; Church JA
    Cereb Cortex; 2018 Oct; 28(10):3697-3710. PubMed ID: 30060152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of look-backs in the processing of written sarcasm.
    Olkoniemi H; Johander E; Kaakinen JK
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Jan; 47(1):87-105. PubMed ID: 30168095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Uncertainty and Expectation in Sentence Processing: Evidence From Subcategorization Distributions.
    Linzen T; Jaeger TF
    Cogn Sci; 2016 Aug; 40(6):1382-411. PubMed ID: 26286681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. "Speech Is Golden": The Importance of Colloquial Arabic for Reading Standard Arabic for Beginning Readers.
    Rakhlin NV; Li N; Aljughaiman A; Grigorenko EL
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2024 Jun; ():1-27. PubMed ID: 38889224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of individual differences in working memory capacity on sentence comprehension: an FMRI study.
    Newman SD; Malaia E; Seo R; Cheng H
    Brain Topogr; 2013 Jul; 26(3):458-67. PubMed ID: 23124385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.