These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37799225)

  • 1. Efficacy of Different Root Canal Irrigating Solutions in Removing Smear Layer: A Scanning Electron Microscopic Study.
    Nanda Z; Singh R; Kamble PP; Deshmukh G; Patil N; Patil AB; Banerjee S
    Cureus; 2023 Sep; 15(9):e44618. PubMed ID: 37799225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Effect of Four Commonly used Root Canal Irrigants on the Removal of Smear Layer: An In-vitro Scanning Electron Microscope Study.
    Kumar P; Prasad N; Darawade A; Bhagat SK; Narayana N; Darawade P
    J Int Oral Health; 2015 Sep; 7(9):88-93. PubMed ID: 26435625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of 17% EDTA and MTAD on intracanal smear layer removal: a scanning electron microscopic study.
    Mozayeni MA; Javaheri GH; Poorroosta P; Ashari MA; Javaheri HH
    Aust Endod J; 2009 Apr; 35(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 19452675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Evaluation of Dentin Microhardness After Use of 17% EDTA, 17% EGTA, 10% Citric Acid, MTAD Used as Chelating Agents Combined With 2.5% Sodium Hypochlorite After Rotary Instrumentation: An
    Unnikrishnan M; Mathai V; Sadasiva K; Santakumari RSM; Girish S; Shailajakumari AK
    J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2019 May; 11(Suppl 2):S156-S163. PubMed ID: 31198329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Scanning Electron Microscopy Analysis of Smear Layer Removal Ability of Conventional Endodontic Irrigation Regimen, MTAD, and QMix™ Versus a Mixture of Azadirachta indica and Citrus limon: An In Vitro Study.
    Meyappan N; Mahadevan M; Manimaran ND; Paulaian B; Gopal R; Kumar N
    Cureus; 2023 Aug; 15(8):e42877. PubMed ID: 37664257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Scanning Electron Microscope Evaluation of Smear Layer Removal and Antimicrobial Action of Mixture of Tetracycline, Acid and Detergent, Sodium Hypochlorite, Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid, and Chlorhexidine Gluconate: An
    Charlie KM; Kuttappa MA; George L; Manoj KV; Joseph B; John NK
    J Int Soc Prev Community Dent; 2018; 8(1):62-69. PubMed ID: 29629331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of MTAD as a final rinse on removal of smear layer in ten-minute preparation time.
    Lotfi M; Vosoughhosseini S; Saghiri MA; Zand V; Ranjkesh B; Ghasemi N
    J Endod; 2012 Oct; 38(10):1391-4. PubMed ID: 22980185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Efficacy of new irrigating solution on smear layer removal in apical third of root canal: A scanning electron microscope study.
    Patil PH; Gulve MN; Kolhe SJ; Samuel RM; Aher GB
    J Conserv Dent; 2018; 21(2):190-193. PubMed ID: 29674823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effectiveness of different final irrigant activation protocols on smear layer removal in curved canals.
    Caron G; Nham K; Bronnec F; Machtou P
    J Endod; 2010 Aug; 36(8):1361-6. PubMed ID: 20647097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparative scanning electron microscopy evaluation of smear layer removal with chitosan and MTAD.
    Zhou H; Li Q; Wei L; Huang S; Zhao S
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2018 Jan; 21(1):76-80. PubMed ID: 29411728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative Evaluation of Smear Layer and Debris on the Canal Walls prepared with a Combination of Hand and Rotary ProTaper Technique using Scanning Electron Microscope.
    Kiran S; Prakash S; Siddharth PR; Saha S; Geojan NE; Ramachandran M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Jul; 17(7):574-81. PubMed ID: 27595725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In Vitro Evaluation of Smear Layer and Debris Removal and Antimicrobial Activity of Different Irrigating Solutions.
    Castagnola R; Martini C; Colangeli M; Pellicciotta I; Marigo L; Grande NM; Bugli F; Plotino G
    Eur Endod J; 2024 Jan; 9(1):81-88. PubMed ID: 37965676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparative scanning electron microscopic investigation of the smear layer after the use of sodium hypochlorite gel and solution forms as root canal irrigants.
    Zand V; Lotfi M; Rahimi S; Mokhtari H; Kazemi A; Sakhamanesh V
    J Endod; 2010 Jul; 36(7):1234-7. PubMed ID: 20630306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effectiveness of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and MTAD on debris and smear layer removal using a self-adjusting file.
    Adigüzel O; Yiğit-Özer S; Kaya S; Uysal İ; Ganidağli-Ayaz S; Akkuş Z
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Dec; 112(6):803-8. PubMed ID: 21873086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of different irrigants including MTAD under SEM.
    Paul ML; Mazumdar D; Niyogi A; Baranwal AK
    J Conserv Dent; 2013 Jul; 16(4):336-41. PubMed ID: 23956537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the efficacy of maleic acid and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid in smear layer removal from instrumented human root canal: a scanning electron microscopic study.
    Ballal NV; Kandian S; Mala K; Bhat KS; Acharya S
    J Endod; 2009 Nov; 35(11):1573-6. PubMed ID: 19840650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effectiveness of chamomile (Matricaria recutita L.), MTAD and sodium hypochlorite irrigants on smear layer.
    Venkataram V; Gokhale ST; Kenchappa M; Nagarajappa R
    Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2013 Aug; 14(4):247-52. PubMed ID: 23872885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Smear layer removal efficacy of different irrigating solutions: a comparative scanning electron microscope evaluation.
    Ahir B; Parekh V; Katyayan MK; Katyayan PA
    Indian J Dent Res; 2014; 25(5):617-22. PubMed ID: 25511062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Time-Dependent Effect of Various Irrigants for Root Canal on Smear Layer Removal.
    Singh S; Singh M; Salgar AR; Chandrahari N; Prathibha N; Koppolu P
    J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2019 Feb; 11(Suppl 1):S51-S58. PubMed ID: 30923431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An In Vitro SEM Study on the Effectiveness of Smear Layer Removal of Four Different Irrigations.
    Andrabi SM; Kumar A; Kumar Tewari R; Kumar Mishra S; Iftekhar H
    Iran Endod J; 2012; 7(4):171-6. PubMed ID: 23130075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.