204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37800887)
1. Feasibility of a Smartphone-Based Hearing Aid App for Mild-to-Moderate Hearing Loss: Prospective Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.
Jo S; Park MK; Seo JH; Lee KE; Han JS; Lim JH; Lee JH; Oh SH
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2023 Oct; 11():e46911. PubMed ID: 37800887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Real-World Effectiveness of Wearable Augmented Reality Device for Patients With Hearing Loss: Prospective Study.
Han UG; Lee JY; Kim GY; Jo M; Lee J; Bang KH; Cho YS; Hong SH; Moon IJ
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2022 Mar; 10(3):e33476. PubMed ID: 35320113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Behavioral Evaluation of 3 Smartphone-Based Hearing Aid Apps for Patients with Mild Hearing Loss: An Exploratory Pilot Study.
Koo M; Nguyen W; Lee JH; Oh SH; Kyun Park M
J Int Adv Otol; 2022 Sep; 18(5):399-404. PubMed ID: 36063096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sentence recognition in noise and perceived benefit of noise reduction on the receiver and transmitter sides of a BICROS hearing aid.
Oeding K; Valente M
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(10):980-91. PubMed ID: 24384083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Knowledge and Expectations of Hearing Aid Apps Among Smartphone Users and Hearing Professionals: Cross-sectional Survey.
Han JS; Park YH; Song JJ; Moon IJ; Lee W; Kim Y; Cho YS; Seo JH; Park MK
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2022 Jan; 10(1):e27809. PubMed ID: 34994699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Differences in Word and Phoneme Recognition in Quiet, Sentence Recognition in Noise, and Subjective Outcomes between Manufacturer First-Fit and Hearing Aids Programmed to NAL-NL2 Using Real-Ear Measures.
Valente M; Oeding K; Brockmeyer A; Smith S; Kallogjeri D
J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Sep; 29(8):706-721. PubMed ID: 30222541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Audiological and clinical outcomes of a transcutaneous bone conduction hearing implant: Six-month results from a multicentre study.
den Besten CA; Monksfield P; Bosman A; Skarzynski PH; Green K; Runge C; Wigren S; Blechert JI; Flynn MC; Mylanus EAM; Hol MKS
Clin Otolaryngol; 2019 Mar; 44(2):144-157. PubMed ID: 30358920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative Effectiveness of Personal Sound Amplification Products Versus Hearing Aids for Unilateral Hearing Loss: A Prospective Randomized Crossover Trial.
Kim MS; Kim KH; Choe G; Park YH
J Korean Med Sci; 2024 Jun; 39(23):e179. PubMed ID: 38887200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effectiveness of an Over-the-Counter Self-fitting Hearing Aid Compared With an Audiologist-Fitted Hearing Aid: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
De Sousa KC; Manchaiah V; Moore DR; Graham MA; Swanepoel W
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2023 Jun; 149(6):522-530. PubMed ID: 37052929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Are smartphone applications (App) useful to improve hearing?
Martinez-Beneyto P; Franchella S; Alonso Rodriguez F; Navarro-Velasquez R; Martinez-Beneito MA; Martini A; Marco Algarra J
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2020 Aug; 40(4):304-310. PubMed ID: 32519992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Efficacy and Effectiveness of Advanced Hearing Aid Directional and Noise Reduction Technologies for Older Adults With Mild to Moderate Hearing Loss.
Wu YH; Stangl E; Chipara O; Hasan SS; DeVries S; Oleson J
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(4):805-822. PubMed ID: 30379683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the CAMEQ2-HF method for fitting hearing aids with multichannel amplitude compression.
Moore BC; Füllgrabe C
Ear Hear; 2010 Oct; 31(5):657-66. PubMed ID: 20526199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Predicting Aided Outcome With Aided Word Recognition Scores Measured With Linear Amplification at Above-conversational Levels.
Fereczkowski M; Neher T
Ear Hear; 2023 Jan-Feb 01; 44(1):155-166. PubMed ID: 36006438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effectiveness of the directional microphone in the Baha® Divino™.
Oeding K; Valente M; Kerckhoff J
J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Sep; 21(8):546-57. PubMed ID: 21034701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Achieved Gain and Subjective Outcomes for a Wide-Bandwidth Contact Hearing Aid Fitted Using CAM2.
Arbogast TL; Moore BCJ; Puria S; Dundas D; Brimacombe J; Edwards B; Carr Levy S
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(3):741-756. PubMed ID: 30300158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cochlear implant combined with a linear frequency transposing hearing aid.
Hua H; Johansson B; Jönsson R; Magnusson L
J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Oct; 23(9):722-32. PubMed ID: 23072964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Active middle ear implant compared with open-fit hearing aid in sloping high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.
Boeheim K; Pok SM; Schloegel M; Filzmoser P
Otol Neurotol; 2010 Apr; 31(3):424-9. PubMed ID: 20042907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Investigation of Extended Bandwidth Hearing Aid Amplification on Speech Intelligibility and Sound Quality in Adults with Mild-to-Moderate Hearing Loss.
Seeto A; Searchfield GD
J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Mar; 29(3):243-254. PubMed ID: 29488874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Benefits of active middle ear implants over hearing aids in patients with sloping high tone hearing loss: comparison with hearing aids.
Lee JM; Jeon JH; Moon IS; Choi JY
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2017 Jun; 37(3):218-223. PubMed ID: 28516965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Speech recognition performance of patients with sensorineural hearing loss under unaided and aided conditions using linear and compression hearing AIDS.
Shanks JE; Wilson RH; Larson V; Williams D
Ear Hear; 2002 Aug; 23(4):280-90. PubMed ID: 12195170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]