These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37801088)

  • 1. Planning lane changes using advance visual and haptic information.
    Frissen I; Mars F
    Psychol Res; 2024 Mar; 88(2):363-378. PubMed ID: 37801088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does haptic steering guidance instigate speeding? A driving simulator study into causes and remedies.
    Melman T; de Winter JC; Abbink DA
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Jan; 98():372-387. PubMed ID: 27865119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing spatially static and dynamic vibrotactile take-over requests in the driver seat.
    Petermeijer SM; Cieler S; de Winter JCF
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Feb; 99(Pt A):218-227. PubMed ID: 27978486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cross-modal warnings for orienting attention in older drivers with and without attention impairments.
    Lees MN; Cosman J; Lee JD; Vecera SP; Dawson JD; Rizzo M
    Appl Ergon; 2012 Jul; 43(4):768-76. PubMed ID: 22204895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Changing lanes: inertial cues and explicit path information facilitate steering performance when visual feedback is removed.
    Macuga KL; Beall AC; Kelly JW; Smith RS; Loomis JM
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 Apr; 178(2):141-50. PubMed ID: 17091302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Haptic Lane-Keeping Assistance for Truck Driving: A Test Track Study.
    Roozendaal J; Johansson E; Winter J; Abbink D; Petermeijer S
    Hum Factors; 2021 Dec; 63(8):1380-1395. PubMed ID: 32551951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modeling the influence of 0.03%, 0.05% and 0.08% blood alcohol concentrations on lane positioning and steering control of Indian drivers.
    Yadav AK; Velaga NR
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2021; 22(5):343-348. PubMed ID: 33979247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Car Gestures - Advisory warning using additional steering wheel angles.
    Maag C; Schneider N; Lübbeke T; Weisswange TH; Goerick C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Oct; 83():143-53. PubMed ID: 26264518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Identifying cognitive distraction using steering wheel reversal rates.
    Kountouriotis GK; Spyridakos P; Carsten OMJ; Merat N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Nov; 96():39-45. PubMed ID: 27497055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of Fixed and sEMG-Based Adaptive Shared Steering Control on Distracted Driver Behavior.
    Wang Z; Suga S; Nacpil EJC; Yang B; Nakano K
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Nov; 21(22):. PubMed ID: 34833767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A mathematical model for predicting lane changes using the steering wheel angle.
    Schmidt K; Beggiato M; Hoffmann KH; Krems JF
    J Safety Res; 2014 Jun; 49():85-90. PubMed ID: 24913491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Should drivers be operating within an automation-free bandwidth? Evaluating haptic steering support systems with different levels of authority.
    Petermeijer SM; Abbink DA; de Winter JC
    Hum Factors; 2015 Feb; 57(1):5-20. PubMed ID: 25790567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modeling Human Steering Behavior in Haptic Shared Control of Autonomy-Enabled Unmanned Ground Vehicles.
    Li C; Cole M; Jayakumar P; Ersal T
    Hum Factors; 2024 Apr; 66(4):1235-1248. PubMed ID: 36205244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mirage events & driver haptic steering alerts in a motion-base driving simulator: A method for selecting an optimal HMI.
    Talamonti W; Tijerina L; Blommer M; Swaminathan R; Curry R; Ellis RD
    Appl Ergon; 2017 Nov; 65():90-104. PubMed ID: 28802464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of steering-system linearity, simulator motion, and truck driving experience on steering of an articulated tractor-semitrailer combination.
    Shyrokau B; De Winter J; Stroosma O; Dijksterhuis C; Loof J; van Paassen R; Happee R
    Appl Ergon; 2018 Sep; 71():17-28. PubMed ID: 29764610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Response preparation in a lane change task.
    Hofmann P; Rinkenauer G
    Ergonomics; 2013; 56(2):268-81. PubMed ID: 23419087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Trust in haptic assistance: weighting visual and haptic cues based on error history.
    Gibo TL; Mugge W; Abbink DA
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Aug; 235(8):2533-2546. PubMed ID: 28534068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of risk expectation on haptically cued corrective manoeuvres during near lane departure.
    Deroo M; Hoc JM; Mars F
    Ergonomics; 2012; 55(4):465-75. PubMed ID: 22423678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Movement precues in planning and execution of aiming movements in Parkinson's disease.
    Leis BC; Rand MK; Van Gemmert AW; Longstaff MG; Lou JS; Stelmach GE
    Exp Neurol; 2005 Aug; 194(2):393-409. PubMed ID: 16022867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The role of visual and nonvisual feedback in a vehicle steering task.
    Wallis G; Chatziastros A; Tresilian J; Tomasevic N
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Oct; 33(5):1127-44. PubMed ID: 17924812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.