BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37801094)

  • 1. A 10-year survival rate of tapered self-tapping bone-level implants from medically compromised Korean patients at a maxillofacial surgical unit.
    Sodnom-Ish B; Eo MY; Kim MJ; Kim SM
    Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg; 2023 Oct; 45(1):35. PubMed ID: 37801094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Long-term survival rates of tapered self-tapping bone-level implants after immediate placement: a positional effective rationale.
    Aung YT; Eo MY; Sodnom-Ish B; Kim MJ; Kim SM
    Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg; 2024 May; 46(1):17. PubMed ID: 38727979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical feasibility and benefits of a tapered, sand-blasted, and acid-etched surfaced tissue-level dental implant.
    Sodnom-Ish B; Eo MY; Nguyen TTH; Kim MJ; Kim SM
    Int J Implant Dent; 2020 Oct; 6(1):39. PubMed ID: 32761304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tissue level implants in healthy versus medically compromised patients: a cohort comparative study.
    Marchio V; Derchi G; Cinquini C; Miceli M; Gabriele M; Alfonsi F; Barone A
    Minerva Stomatol; 2020 Oct; 69(5):295-301. PubMed ID: 32407061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of the Survival Rate of Short Dental Implants in Medically Compromised Patients.
    Jagadeesh KN; Verma AK; Parihar AS; Kochhar AS; Das AC; Razi MA
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Aug; 21(8):880-883. PubMed ID: 33568609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dental Implants with a Calcium Ions-Modified Surface and Platelet Concentrates for the Rehabilitation of Medically Compromised Patients: A Retrospective Study with 5-Year Follow-Up.
    Mozzati M; Gallesio G; Menicucci G; Manzella C; Tumedei M; Del Fabbro M
    Materials (Basel); 2021 May; 14(11):. PubMed ID: 34064086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical and Radiological Long-Term Outcome of a Tapered Implant System with Special Emphasis on the Influence of Augmentation Procedures.
    Schiegnitz E; Al-Nawas B; Tegner A; Sagheb K; Berres M; Kämmerer PW; Wagner W
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2016 Aug; 18(4):810-20. PubMed ID: 25810365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Guidance and rationale for the immediate implant placement in the maxillary molar.
    Mustakim KR; Eo MY; Lee JY; Myoung H; Seo MH; Kim SM
    J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2023 Feb; 49(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 36859373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. 7-mm-long dental implants: retrospective clinical outcomes in medically compromised patients.
    Nguyen TTH; Eo MY; Cho YJ; Myoung H; Kim SM
    J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Oct; 45(5):260-266. PubMed ID: 31728333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Immediate loading of tapered implants placed in postextraction sockets: retrospective analysis of the 5-year clinical outcome.
    Mura P
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Aug; 14(4):565-74. PubMed ID: 20662861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ten-year retrospective follow-up study of the TiOblast dental implant.
    Al-Nawas B; Kämmerer PW; Morbach T; Ladwein C; Wegener J; Wagner W
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Mar; 14(1):127-34. PubMed ID: 20156231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The medically compromised patient: Are dental implants a feasible option?
    Vissink A; Spijkervet F; Raghoebar GM
    Oral Dis; 2018 Mar; 24(1-2):253-260. PubMed ID: 29480621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical field trial examining an implant with a sand-blasted, acid-etched surface.
    Cochran D; Oates T; Morton D; Jones A; Buser D; Peters F
    J Periodontol; 2007 Jun; 78(6):974-82. PubMed ID: 17539708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Retrospective cohort study of 4591 Straumann implants in private practice setting, with up to 10-year follow-up. Part 1: multivariate survival analysis.
    French D; Larjava H; Ofec R
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Nov; 26(11):1345-54. PubMed ID: 25134415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. 10-year prospective cohort follow-up of immediately restored XiVE implants.
    Degidi M; Nardi D; Piattelli A
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Jun; 27(6):694-700. PubMed ID: 26096295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dental implants in medically complex patients-a retrospective study.
    Manor Y; Simon R; Haim D; Garfunkel A; Moses O
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Mar; 21(2):701-708. PubMed ID: 27604233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stability, marginal bone loss and survival of standard and modified sand-blasted, acid-etched implants in bilateral edentulous spaces: a prospective 15-month evaluation.
    Karabuda ZC; Abdel-Haq J; Arisan V
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Aug; 22(8):840-9. PubMed ID: 21198901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Implant survival rates for oral and maxillofacial surgery residents: a retrospective clinical review with analysis of resident level of training on implant survival.
    Melo MD; Shafie H; Obeid G
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Aug; 64(8):1185-9. PubMed ID: 16860207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of failure rate of dental implants in medically compromised patients.
    Parihar AS; Madhuri S; Devanna R; Sharma G; Singh R; Shetty K
    J Family Med Prim Care; 2020 Feb; 9(2):883-885. PubMed ID: 32318439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Flap vs. flapless surgical techniques at immediate implant function in predominantly soft bone for rehabilitation of partial edentulism: a prospective cohort study with follow-up of 1 year.
    Maló P; Nobre Md
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2008; 1(4):293-304. PubMed ID: 20467636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.