These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3780137)

  • 1. Peer review: the attacks from without.
    Brandt EN
    Clin Res; 1986 Oct; 34(4):473-6. PubMed ID: 3780137
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Congress slashes "silly titles".
    Anderson C
    Nature; 1992 May; 357(6376):271. PubMed ID: 1589030
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Peer review catches congressional flak.
    Stone R
    Science; 1992 May; 256(5059):959. PubMed ID: 1589777
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Research funding. Politics and funding in the U.S. public biomedical R&D system.
    Hegde D; Mowery DC
    Science; 2008 Dec; 322(5909):1797-8. PubMed ID: 19095928
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Some problems facins biomedical research.
    Longo LD
    Fed Proc; 1973 Nov; 32(11):2078-85. PubMed ID: 4752005
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Politics and scientific decision making.
    Blissett M
    Conn Med; 1973 Dec; 37(12):625-30. PubMed ID: 4767361
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Don't create a climate of fear.
    Nature; 2003 Oct; 425(6961):885. PubMed ID: 14586426
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Protection of human research subjects: proposed rule.
    Fed Regist; 1979 Aug; 44(158):47687-729. PubMed ID: 10242808
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. American sex survey cancelled.
    Roberts J
    BMJ; 1991 Aug; 303(6797):263. PubMed ID: 1888924
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A political attack on peer review.
    Nat Neurosci; 2005 Oct; 8(10):1273. PubMed ID: 16189527
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Research funding and the peer review system.
    Apirion D
    Fed Proc; 1979 Dec; 38(13):2649-50. PubMed ID: 510555
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. NIH begins review of studies that were questioned at a congressional hearing.
    Brainard J
    Chron High Educ; 2003 Nov; 50(11):A24. PubMed ID: 15287135
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Presidential candidates weigh in on health issues.
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Oct; 96(20):1494. PubMed ID: 15494595
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Letter: Peer review.
    Westhead EW
    Fed Proc; 1974 Jun; 33(6):1679. PubMed ID: 4827513
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The peer review system on trial.
    Bowers R
    Am Sci; 1975; 63(6):624-6. PubMed ID: 1200477
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Moron peer review.
    Brenner S
    Curr Biol; 1999 Oct; 9(20):R755. PubMed ID: 10531042
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomedical politics. Sex studies denounced, NIH's peer-review process defended.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2003 Nov; 302(5647):966-7. PubMed ID: 14605337
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does peer review at the US National Institutes of Health need modifying?
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2008 Feb; 16(2):238. PubMed ID: 18284879
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does peer review work?
    Symington JW; Kramer TR
    Am Sci; 1977; 65(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 842929
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Research lobbies. New research lobby draws fire.
    Anderson C
    Nature; 1990 Oct; 347(6293):505. PubMed ID: 2215669
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.