These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Does peer review at the US National Institutes of Health need modifying? Reprod Biomed Online; 2008 Feb; 16(2):238. PubMed ID: 18284879 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The peer review system. Paque RE Fed Proc; 1980 May; 39(7):2350-1. PubMed ID: 7371872 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The peer review system. Homburger F Fed Proc; 1980 May; 39(7):2349-50. PubMed ID: 7371871 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A proposal for per capita distribution of research funds with administrative flexibility. Hirsch HR Fed Proc; 1984 Apr; 43(5):7a-8a. PubMed ID: 6705928 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Nurturing the biomedical research enterprise. Wyngaarden JB P R Health Sci J; 1986 Aug; 5(2):43-50. PubMed ID: 3823360 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Peer review of researchgrant applications at the National Institutes of Health 2: review by an initial review group. Henley C Fed Proc; 1977 Aug; 36(9):2186-90. PubMed ID: 885260 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Peer review of research grant applications at the National Institutes of Health 1: the assignment and referral processes. Henley C Fed Proc; 1977 Jul; 36(8):2066-8. PubMed ID: 872944 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Proposals for improving the Peer Review System of the National Institutes of Health. Kirschstein RL Clin Res; 1977 Dec; 25(5):295-6. PubMed ID: 10304717 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Peer review of research grant applications at the National Institutes of Health 3: review by an advisory board/council. Henley C Fed Proc; 1977 Sep; 36(10):2335-8. PubMed ID: 892000 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Letter: The National Institutes of Health grants peer review study team. Looney GL Am J Chin Med (Gard City N Y); 1976; 4(2):201-3. PubMed ID: 937242 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Remembering the peer in peer review. O'Connell KA Nurs Res; 1987; 36(6):379-80. PubMed ID: 3671127 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. NIH and the scientist--and a crisis of apathy. Waitzman MB Fed Proc; 1974 Jun; 33(6):1677-8. PubMed ID: 4827512 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Management operations of the National Cancer Institute that influence the governance of science. Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1984 May; 64():1-139. PubMed ID: 6749243 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparability of the American Cancer Society and National Institutes of Health peer review systems. Vivona S; Do van Quy D Cancer Res; 1973 Apr; 33(4):919. PubMed ID: 4739656 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]