These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37802390)

  • 21. The effect of motor control requirements on drivers' eye-gaze pattern during automated driving.
    Goncalves RC; Louw TL; Quaresma M; Madigan R; Merat N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Dec; 148():105788. PubMed ID: 33039820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Visual attention and the transition from novice to advanced driver.
    Underwood G
    Ergonomics; 2007 Aug; 50(8):1235-49. PubMed ID: 17558667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Analyzing the effect of fog weather conditions on driver lane-keeping performance using the SHRP2 naturalistic driving study data.
    Das A; Ghasemzadeh A; Ahmed MM
    J Safety Res; 2019 Feb; 68():71-80. PubMed ID: 30876522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Lateral control assistance for car drivers: a comparison of motor priming and warning systems.
    Navarro J; Mars F; Hoc JM
    Hum Factors; 2007 Oct; 49(5):950-60. PubMed ID: 17915609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluating driver drowsiness countermeasures.
    Gaspar JG; Brown TL; Schwarz CW; Lee JD; Kang J; Higgins JS
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 May; 18(sup1):S58-S63. PubMed ID: 28323444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effect of information from dash-based human-machine interfaces on drivers' gaze patterns and lane-change manoeuvres after conditionally automated driving.
    Gonçalves RC; Louw TL; Madigan R; Quaresma M; Romano R; Merat N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Sep; 174():106726. PubMed ID: 35716544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The safety potential of lane departure warning systems-A descriptive real-world study of fatal lane departure passenger car crashes in Sweden.
    Sternlund S
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 May; 18(sup1):S18-S23. PubMed ID: 28394639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Modeling driver's braking and steering behavior along horizontal curves of two-lane rural highways for ADAS applications.
    Choudhari T; Maji A
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2022; 23(7):404-409. PubMed ID: 35862932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Toyota drivers' experiences with Dynamic Radar Cruise Control, Pre-Collision System, and Lane-Keeping Assist.
    Eichelberger AH; McCartt AT
    J Safety Res; 2016 Feb; 56():67-73. PubMed ID: 26875167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The influence of curbs on driver behaviors in four-lane rural highways--A driving simulator based study.
    Yang Q; Overton R; Han LD; Yan X; Richards SH
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Jan; 50():1289-97. PubMed ID: 23084096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Assessing Driving Risk at the Second Phase of Overtaking on Two-Lane Highways for Young Novice Drivers Based on Driving Simulation.
    Pan J; Shen Y
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Feb; 19(5):. PubMed ID: 35270387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Anticipatory Driving in Automated Vehicles: The Effects of Driving Experience and Distraction.
    He D; DeGuzman CA; Donmez B
    Hum Factors; 2023 Jun; 65(4):663. PubMed ID: 34348496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Design and cognitive evaluation of 6 dynamic lane departure warning symbols.
    Maddahi H; Pouyakian M; Tabatabai Ghomsheh F; Piri L; Osqueizadeh R
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Nov; 17(8):842-7. PubMed ID: 26902543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Assessing drivers' response during automated driver support system failures with non-driving tasks.
    Shen S; Neyens DM
    J Safety Res; 2017 Jun; 61():149-155. PubMed ID: 28454860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Driver response and recovery following automation initiated disengagement in real-world hands-free driving.
    Gershon P; Mehler B; Reimer B
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2023; 24(4):356-361. PubMed ID: 36988583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. On the impact of advanced driver assistance systems on driving distraction and risky behaviour: An empirical analysis of irish commercial drivers.
    Masello L; Sheehan B; Castignani G; Shannon D; Murphy F
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Apr; 183():106969. PubMed ID: 36696744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A novel driver hazard perception sensitivity model based on drivers' characteristics: A simulator study.
    Asadamraji M; Saffarzadeh M; Ross V; Borujerdian A; Ferdosi T; Sheikholeslami S
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(5):492-497. PubMed ID: 31180727
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Does early training improve driving skills of young novice French drivers?
    Freydier C; Berthelon C; Bastien-Toniazzo M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Nov; 96():228-236. PubMed ID: 27544887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Drivers overtaking bicyclists-An examination using naturalistic driving data.
    Feng F; Bao S; Hampshire RC; Delp M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jun; 115():98-109. PubMed ID: 29550613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Analysis of effects of driver's evasive action time on rear-end collision risk using a driving simulator.
    Shah D; Lee C
    J Safety Res; 2021 Sep; 78():242-250. PubMed ID: 34399920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.