152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37802609)
21. No red cell alloimmunization or change of clinical outcome after using fresh frozen cancellous allograft bone for acetabular reconstruction in revision hip arthroplasty: a follow up study.
Mittag F; Straub M; Schäfer R; Kluba T; Ipach I
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2012 Sep; 13():187. PubMed ID: 23009246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Acetabular revision with bone grafting and cementation for aseptic loosening after primary Charnley low-friction hip arthroplasty with structural bulk autografts.
Mohammed R; Drampalos E; Siney P; Purbach B; Kay P
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2016 Dec; 24(3):328-331. PubMed ID: 28031500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Bone allograft and implant fixation tested under influence of bio-burden reduction, periosteal augmentation and topical antibiotics. Animal experimental studies.
Barckman J
Dan Med J; 2014 Jan; 61(1):B4720. PubMed ID: 24393592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Favorable Early Results of Impaction Bone Grafting With Reinforcement Mesh for the Treatment of Paprosky 3B Acetabular Defects.
Waddell BS; Boettner F; Gonzalez Della Valle A
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Mar; 32(3):919-923. PubMed ID: 27817994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Do custom 3D-printed revision acetabular implants provide enough value to justify the additional costs? The health-economic comparison of a new porous 3D-printed hip implant for revision arthroplasty of Paprosky type 3B acetabular defects and its closest alternative.
Tack P; Victor J; Gemmel P; Annemans L
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2021 Feb; 107(1):102600. PubMed ID: 32409268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Reconstruction of non-contained acetabular defects with impaction grafting, a reinforcement mesh and a cemented polyethylene acetabular component.
Waddell BS; Della Valle AG
Bone Joint J; 2017 Jan; 99-B(1 Supple A):25-30. PubMed ID: 28042115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The biological acetabular reconstruction with bone allografts in hip revision arthroplasty.
Busanelli L; Castagnini F; Bordini B; Stea S; Calderoni PP; Toni A
Musculoskelet Surg; 2019 Aug; 103(2):173-179. PubMed ID: 30328029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. What Are the Long-term Results of Cemented Revision THA with Use of Both Acetabular and Femoral Impaction Bone Grafting in Patients Younger Than 55 Years?
Verspeek J; Nijenhuis TA; Kuijpers MFL; Rijnen WHC; Schreurs BW
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2021 Jan; 479(1):84-91. PubMed ID: 32898047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Mid- to Long-term Follow-up of Severe Acetabular Bone Defect after Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Impaction Bone Grafting and Metal Mesh.
Yang C; Zhu K; Dai H; Zhang X; Wang Q; Wang Q
Orthop Surg; 2023 Mar; 15(3):750-757. PubMed ID: 36644857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Results of acetabular reconstruction with solid bone graft in primary and revision hip arthroplasty].
Zofka P
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2006 Jun; 73(3):190-6. PubMed ID: 16846565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Long-term results of acetabular reconstruction using irradiated allograft bone.
Green CM; Buckley SC; Hamer AJ; Kerry RM; Harrison TP
Bone Joint J; 2018 Nov; 100-B(11):1449-1454. PubMed ID: 30418060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A cemented cup with acetabular impaction bone grafting is more cost-effective than an uncemented cup in patients under 50 years.
Busch VJ; Verschueren J; Adang EM; Lie SA; Havelin LI; Schreurs BW
Hip Int; 2016; 26(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 26743037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Long-term Follow-up Results of Femoral Revision Hip Arthroplasty Using Impaction Bone Grafting and Standard Cemented Polished Stem.
Park JS; Kweon SH; Kang SJ; Jo YH
Clin Orthop Surg; 2023 Oct; 15(5):734-739. PubMed ID: 37811512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Total hip arthroplasty in patients under 40 years of age and, if indicated, reconstruction of acetabular defects with bone impaction grafting].
de Kam DC; Gardeniers JW; Veth RP; Schreurs BW
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2010; 154():A811. PubMed ID: 20482927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Impaction bone grafting in hip re-revision surgery.
Garcia-Rey E; Saldaña L; Garcia-Cimbrelo E
Bone Joint J; 2021 Mar; 103-B(3):492-499. PubMed ID: 33641418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Reconstruction of the Shallow Acetabulum With a Combination of Autologous Bulk and Impaction Bone Grafting Fixed by Cement.
Maruyama M; Wakabayashi S; Ota H; Tensho K
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Feb; 475(2):387-395. PubMed ID: 27837399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. 11-Year Mean Follow-Up of Acetabular Impaction Grafting With a Mixture of Bone Graft and Hydroxyapatite Porous Synthetic Bone Substitute.
Abdullah KM; Hussain N; Parsons SJ; Porteous MJL; Atrey A
J Arthroplasty; 2018 May; 33(5):1481-1486. PubMed ID: 29291910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Femoral impaction allografting for significant bone loss in revision hip arthroplasty.
Goff TAJ; Bobak P
Hip Int; 2017 May; 27(3):281-285. PubMed ID: 28165587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The outcome of femoral component revision arthroplasty with impaction allograft bone grafting and a cemented polished Exeter stem: A prospective cohort study of 208 revision arthroplasties with a mean follow-up of ten years.
te Stroet MA; Rijnen WH; Gardeniers JW; van Kampen A; Schreurs BW
Bone Joint J; 2015 Jun; 97-B(6):771-9. PubMed ID: 26033056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Impaction Grafting Is Sufficient to Address Acetabular Deficiency During Total Hip Arthroplasty of Most Dysplastic Hips With Over 30% Bone Defect.
Mozafari JK; Pisoudeh K; Gharanizadeh K; Ghazavi M; Abolghasemian M
J Arthroplasty; 2022 Jul; 37(7):1302-1307. PubMed ID: 35257820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
