25 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3780364)
1. DNA-ploidy, G2M-fractions and prognosis of stages B and C prostate carcinoma.
Müller JG; Demel S; Wirth MP; Manseck A; Frohmüller HG; Müller HA
Virchows Arch; 1994; 424(6):647-51. PubMed ID: 8055159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of section thickness on quality of flow cytometric DNA content determinations in paraffin-embedded tissues.
Stephenson RA; Gay H; Fair WR; Melamed MR
Cytometry; 1986 Jan; 7(1):41-4. PubMed ID: 2419054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Flow cytometric sorting of paraffin-embedded tumor tissues considerably improves molecular genetic analysis.
Jordanova ES; Corver WE; Vonk MJ; Leers MP; Riemersma SA; Schuuring E; Kluin PM
Am J Clin Pathol; 2003 Sep; 120(3):327-34. PubMed ID: 14502796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Flow cytometric DNA analysis of ulcerative colitis using paraffin-embedded biopsy specimens: comparison with morphology and DNA analysis of fresh samples.
Hartmann DP; Montgomery EA; Carr NJ; Gupta PK; Azumi N
Am J Gastroenterol; 1995 Apr; 90(4):590-6. PubMed ID: 7717317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [DNA cytometry using paraffin embedded tumor tissues. Comparison of flow cytometry (FCM) and image cytometry (ICM)].
Baretton G; Blasenbreu S; Li X; DePascale T; Löhrs U
Zentralbl Pathol; 1994 Feb; 139(6):419-25. PubMed ID: 7512820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative flow cytometric DNA analysis on fresh and paraffin-embedded tumor tissue in different neoplasms.
Niezabitowski A; Lackowska B; Ryś J; Dyba T; Gruchała A; Szklarski W; Stelmach A; Kruczak A; Swiatkiewicz I
Pol J Pathol; 1994; 45(3):203-8. PubMed ID: 7953437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comments on "Effect of section thickness on quality of flow cytometric DNA content determinations in paraffin-embedded tissues".
Camplejohn RS; Macartney JC
Cytometry; 1986 Nov; 7(6):612-5. PubMed ID: 3780364
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Flow cytometry using paraffin-embedded tissue: five years on.
Hedley DW
Cytometry; 1989 May; 10(3):229-41. PubMed ID: 2653738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Factors that affect DNA content analysis by flow cytometry].
Castillo JL; Kawaguchi F; Madariaga J; Venegas O; Lecannelier E; Ocampo S; Castillo M
Rev Med Chil; 1999 Nov; 127(11):1385-97. PubMed ID: 10835727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Flow cytometry. Advantages and disadvantages of analysis technics after embedding in paraffin].
Laquerriere A; Doublet B; Beuvon F; Hemet J
Ann Pathol; 1989; 9(4):295-8. PubMed ID: 2675869
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Cell surface markers and cell cycle analysis of lymphomas.
Braylan RC; Benson NA
Cytometry Suppl; 1988; 3():73-7. PubMed ID: 3076371
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. DNA analysis from paraffin-embedded blocks.
Hedley DW
Methods Cell Biol; 1994; 41():231-40. PubMed ID: 7861965
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
