These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37803717)

  • 1. Watch out for the healthy trap! How food flavor influences healthiness evaluations and consumption.
    Cai W; Chen T; Ren T; Qing P
    Food Res Int; 2023 Nov; 173(Pt 2):113379. PubMed ID: 37803717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The impact of the Nutri-Score nutrition label on perceived healthiness and purchase intentions.
    De Temmerman J; Heeremans E; Slabbinck H; Vermeir I
    Appetite; 2021 Feb; 157():104995. PubMed ID: 33068665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Negative Effects of Long Time Physical Activity Calorie Equivalent Labeling on Purchase Intention for Unhealthy Food.
    Huang Y; Yang X; Chen Q
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Mar; 19(6):. PubMed ID: 35329181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Negative Effects of Physical Activity Calorie Equivalent Labels on Consumers' Food Brand Evaluation.
    Yang X; Hong M; Shi D; Chen Q
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Oct; 19(19):. PubMed ID: 36231976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does environmental friendliness equal healthiness? Swiss consumers' perception of protein products.
    Lazzarini GA; Zimmermann J; Visschers VH; Siegrist M
    Appetite; 2016 Oct; 105():663-73. PubMed ID: 27378749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sugar labeling: How numerical information of sugar content influences healthiness and tastiness expectations.
    Haasova S; Florack A
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(11):e0223510. PubMed ID: 31682613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Consumer Understanding of Food Quality, Healthiness, and Environmental Impact: A Cross-National Perspective.
    Petrescu DC; Vermeir I; Petrescu-Mag RM
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Dec; 17(1):. PubMed ID: 31881711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evidence that novel flavors unconditionally suppress weight gain in the absence of flavor-calorie associations.
    Seitz BM; Flaim ME; Blaisdell AP
    Learn Behav; 2020 Sep; 48(3):351-363. PubMed ID: 32056147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Differential Effects of Physical Activity Calorie Equivalent Labeling on Consumer Preferences for Healthy and Unhealthy Food Products: Evidence from a Choice Experiment.
    Yang X; Huang Y; Han M; Wen X; Zheng Q; Chen Q; Chen Q
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Feb; 18(4):. PubMed ID: 33672920
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Motivation for choice and healthiness perception of calorie-reduced dairy products. a cross-cultural study.
    Johansen SB; Næs T; Hersleth M
    Appetite; 2011 Feb; 56(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 21093506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Impact of Disclosure of Nutrition Information on Consumers' Behavioral Intention in Korea.
    Choi J
    J Am Coll Nutr; 2015; 34(5):378-84. PubMed ID: 25826204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Healthiness or calories? Side biases in food perception and preference.
    Manippa V; Giuliani F; Brancucci A
    Appetite; 2020 Apr; 147():104552. PubMed ID: 31816338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of free-from symbols on consumer perceptions of healthiness, quality and intention to buy baked food products.
    Castellini G; Savarese M; Graffigna G
    Int J Food Sci Nutr; 2023 May; 74(3):395-402. PubMed ID: 37254896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The credibility of the effects of functional food products and consumers' willingness to purchase/willingness to pay- review.
    Plasek B; Temesi Á
    Appetite; 2019 Dec; 143():104398. PubMed ID: 31401236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adding sodium information to casual dining restaurant menus: Beneficial or detrimental for consumers?
    Byrd K; Almanza B; Ghiselli RF; Behnke C; Eicher-Miller HA
    Appetite; 2018 Jun; 125():474-485. PubMed ID: 29501682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Visual Size Matters: The Effect of Product Depiction Size on Calorie Estimates.
    Tal A; Gvili Y; Amar M
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Nov; 18(23):. PubMed ID: 34886118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Naturally green, irrationally lean: How background scenery affects calorie judgments.
    Folwarczny M; Otterbring T; Sigurdsson V; K L Tan L
    Food Res Int; 2023 Feb; 164():112339. PubMed ID: 36737932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Changes in preferences of gestating heifers fed untreated or ammoniated straw in different flavors.
    Atwood SB; Provenza FD; Wiedmeier RD; Banner RE
    J Anim Sci; 2001 Dec; 79(12):3027-33. PubMed ID: 11811456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How well do Australian shoppers understand energy terms on food labels?
    Watson WL; Chapman K; King L; Kelly B; Hughes C; Yu Louie JC; Crawford J; Gill TP
    Public Health Nutr; 2013 Mar; 16(3):409-17. PubMed ID: 22464021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effectiveness of interpretive front-of-pack nutritional labelling schemes on the promotion of healthier food choices: a systematic review.
    Feteira-Santos R; Fernandes J; Virgolino A; Alarcão V; Sena C; Vieira CP; Gregório MJ; Nogueira P; Costa A; Graça P; Santos O
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2020 Mar; 18(1):24-37. PubMed ID: 31895716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.