These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37803940)

  • 1. Model resolution-based deconvolution for improved quantitative susceptibility mapping.
    Mathew RS; Paluru N; Yalavarthy PK
    NMR Biomed; 2024 Feb; 37(2):e5055. PubMed ID: 37803940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantitative susceptibility mapping using deep neural network: QSMnet.
    Yoon J; Gong E; Chatnuntawech I; Bilgic B; Lee J; Jung W; Ko J; Jung H; Setsompop K; Zaharchuk G; Kim EY; Pauly J; Lee J
    Neuroimage; 2018 Oct; 179():199-206. PubMed ID: 29894829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantitative susceptibility map reconstruction using annihilating filter-based low-rank Hankel matrix approach.
    Ahn HS; Park SH; Ye JC
    Magn Reson Med; 2020 Mar; 83(3):858-871. PubMed ID: 31468595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multi-echo dipole inversion for magnetic susceptibility mapping.
    Kames C; Doucette J; Rauscher A
    Magn Reson Med; 2023 Jun; 89(6):2391-2401. PubMed ID: 36695283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping Using the Multiple Dipole-inversion Combination with k-space Segmentation Method.
    Sato R; Shirai T; Taniguchi Y; Murase T; Bito Y; Ochi H
    Magn Reson Med Sci; 2017 Oct; 16(4):340-350. PubMed ID: 28367904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Whole head quantitative susceptibility mapping using a least-norm direct dipole inversion method.
    Sun H; Ma Y; MacDonald ME; Pike GB
    Neuroimage; 2018 Oct; 179():166-175. PubMed ID: 29906634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rapid two-step dipole inversion for susceptibility mapping with sparsity priors.
    Kames C; Wiggermann V; Rauscher A
    Neuroimage; 2018 Feb; 167():276-283. PubMed ID: 29138089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantitative susceptibility mapping for investigating subtle susceptibility variations in the human brain.
    Schweser F; Sommer K; Deistung A; Reichenbach JR
    Neuroimage; 2012 Sep; 62(3):2083-100. PubMed ID: 22659482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Human brain atlas for automated region of interest selection in quantitative susceptibility mapping: application to determine iron content in deep gray matter structures.
    Lim IA; Faria AV; Li X; Hsu JT; Airan RD; Mori S; van Zijl PC
    Neuroimage; 2013 Nov; 82():449-69. PubMed ID: 23769915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Background field removal using a region adaptive kernel for quantitative susceptibility mapping of human brain.
    Fang J; Bao L; Li X; van Zijl PCM; Chen Z
    J Magn Reson; 2017 Aug; 281():130-140. PubMed ID: 28595120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Investigating the effect of oblique image acquisition on the accuracy of QSM and a robust tilt correction method.
    Kiersnowski OC; Karsa A; Wastling SJ; Thornton JS; Shmueli K
    Magn Reson Med; 2023 May; 89(5):1791-1808. PubMed ID: 36480002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Morphology-adaptive total variation for the reconstruction of quantitative susceptibility map from the magnetic resonance imaging phase.
    Guo L; Mei Y; Guan J; Tan X; Xu Y; Chen W; Feng Q; Feng Y
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(5):e0196922. PubMed ID: 29738526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computed inverse resonance imaging for magnetic susceptibility map reconstruction.
    Chen Z; Calhoun V
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012; 36(2):265-74. PubMed ID: 22446372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A modulated closed form solution for quantitative susceptibility mapping--a thorough evaluation and comparison to iterative methods based on edge prior knowledge.
    Khabipova D; Wiaux Y; Gruetter R; Marques JP
    Neuroimage; 2015 Feb; 107():163-174. PubMed ID: 25463463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Iterative projection onto convex sets for quantitative susceptibility mapping.
    Deng W; Boada F; Poser BA; Schirda C; Stenger VA
    Magn Reson Med; 2015 Feb; 73(2):697-703. PubMed ID: 24604410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Background field removal technique based on non-regularized variable kernels sophisticated harmonic artifact reduction for phase data for quantitative susceptibility mapping.
    Kan H; Arai N; Takizawa M; Omori K; Kasai H; Kunitomo H; Hirose Y; Shibamoto Y
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Oct; 52():94-101. PubMed ID: 29902566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fast quantitative susceptibility mapping with L1-regularization and automatic parameter selection.
    Bilgic B; Fan AP; Polimeni JR; Cauley SF; Bianciardi M; Adalsteinsson E; Wald LL; Setsompop K
    Magn Reson Med; 2014 Nov; 72(5):1444-59. PubMed ID: 24259479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Technical Note: Optimization of quantitative susceptibility mapping by streaking artifact detection.
    Wu ML; Wang CK; Lin PY; Chao TC
    Med Phys; 2020 Nov; 47(11):5715-5722. PubMed ID: 32945538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. MRI estimates of brain iron concentration in normal aging using quantitative susceptibility mapping.
    Bilgic B; Pfefferbaum A; Rohlfing T; Sullivan EV; Adalsteinsson E
    Neuroimage; 2012 Feb; 59(3):2625-35. PubMed ID: 21925274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Discussion and improvement methods of quantitative susceptibility mapping reconstruction].
    Guo H; Yu Z; Ma G; Li C
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Dec; 36(6):930-937. PubMed ID: 31875366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.