129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37803978)
1. [Effect of different kinds of gingival retraction agents on the polymerization inhibition of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials].
Hou QQ; Ge H; Gao YM
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2023 Jun; 32(3):251-254. PubMed ID: 37803978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Polymerization time compatibility index of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials with conventional and experimental gingival margin displacement agents.
Nowakowska D; Raszewski Z; Saczko J; Kulbacka J; Więckiewicz W
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):168-75. PubMed ID: 24461950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Inhibition of polymerization of polyvinyl siloxanes by medicaments used on gingival retraction cords.
de Camargo LM; Chee WW; Donovan TE
J Prosthet Dent; 1993 Aug; 70(2):114-7. PubMed ID: 8371173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Setting Time of Polyether Impression Materials after Contact with Conventional and Experimental Gingival Margin Displacement Agents.
Nowakowska D; Raszewski Z; Ziętek M; Saczko J; Kulbacka J; Więckiewicz W
J Prosthodont; 2018 Feb; 27(2):182-188. PubMed ID: 27333590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of sulfur-based hemostatic agents and gingival retraction cords handled with latex gloves on the polymerization of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials.
Machado CE; Guedes CG
J Appl Oral Sci; 2011; 19(6):628-33. PubMed ID: 22230998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of conventional and experimental gingival retraction solutions on the tensile strength and inhibition of polymerization of four types of impression materials.
Sábio S; Franciscone PA; Mondelli J
J Appl Oral Sci; 2008; 16(4):280-5. PubMed ID: 19089261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of Effectiveness of Three New Gingival Retraction Systems: A Comparative Study.
Kumari S; Singh P; Parmar UG; Patel AM
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Aug; 22(8):922-927. PubMed ID: 34753845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of contemporary retraction agents and cleaning with hydrogen peroxide on the polymerization of elastomeric impression materials.
Vohra F; Altokhais F; Thafrah AB; Alsaif K; Alyahya A; Alsahhaf A; AlFawaz YF; Aali KA; Abduljabbar T; Aldeeb M
J Appl Biomater Funct Mater; 2020; 18():2280800019891072. PubMed ID: 31986959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Indirect inhibition of polymerization of a polyvinyl siloxane impression material: a case report.
Chee WW; Donovan TE; Kahn RL
Quintessence Int; 1991 Feb; 22(2):133-5. PubMed ID: 2068247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Influence of Nitrile Gloves on the Setting Behavior of Polyvinyl Siloxane Putty Impression Materials.
Delgado AJ; Amaya-Pajares SP; Su Y; Behar-Horenstein L; Donovan TE
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2018 Mar; 26(1):40-45. PubMed ID: 29469997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of polyvinyl siloxane impression material on the polymerization of composite resin.
Chen L; Kleverlaan CJ; Liang K; Yang D
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Apr; 117(4):552-558. PubMed ID: 27765393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical efficacy of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials using the one-step two-viscosity impression technique.
Dogan S; Schwedhelm ER; Heindl H; Mancl L; Raigrodski AJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Aug; 114(2):217-22. PubMed ID: 25976708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical evaluation of different gingival retraction cords.
Kumbuloglu O; User A; Toksavul S; Boyacioglu H
Quintessence Int; 2007 Feb; 38(2):e92-8. PubMed ID: 17510720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Clinical effect of digital impression combined with all-ceramic denture on restoration of 60 patients with dental defects].
Chen LR; Liang XJ; Yang FY; Luo H
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2022 Jun; 31(3):313-317. PubMed ID: 36204964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of 3 medicaments on the dimensional accuracy and surface detail reproduction of polyvinyl siloxane impressions.
O'Mahony A; Spencer P; Williams K; Corcoran J
Quintessence Int; 2000 Mar; 31(3):201-6. PubMed ID: 11203927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of Gingival Retraction Paste and Subsequent Cleaning with Hydrogen Peroxide on the Polymerization of Three Elastomeric Impression Materials: An In Vitro Study.
Abduljabbar TS; Al Amri MD; Al Rifaiy MQ; Al-Sowygh ZH; Vohra FA; Balous MA; Alqarni AS; Alotaibi AO
J Prosthodont; 2019 Jul; 28(6):709-714. PubMed ID: 28960658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of various interim fixed prosthodontic materials on the polymerization of elastomeric impression materials.
Al-Sowygh ZH
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):176-81. PubMed ID: 24559525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical Assessment of Gingival Sulcus Width using Various Gingival Displacement Materials.
Goutham GB; Jayanti I; Jalaluddin M; Avijeeta A; Ramanna PK; Joy J
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 May; 19(5):502-506. PubMed ID: 29807958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Margin adaptation of indirect composite inlays fabricated on flexible dies.
Price RB; Gerrow JD
J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Mar; 83(3):306-13. PubMed ID: 10709039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Dimensional Accuracy of Three Different Impression Materials Using Three Different Techniques for Implant Impressions: An
Khan SA; Singh S; Neyaz N; Jaiswal MM; Tanwar AS; Singh A
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Feb; 22(2):172-178. PubMed ID: 34257178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
