These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37803978)

  • 21. Defects in automixed addition silicone elastomers prepared by putty-wash impression technique.
    Soh G; Chong YH
    J Oral Rehabil; 1991 Nov; 18(6):547-53. PubMed ID: 1762027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [The global impression technic in fixed dentures].
    Lamy M; Mainjot A
    Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 2001; 56(3):168-80. PubMed ID: 16193850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluation of efficacy of different gingival displacement materials on gingival sulcus width.
    Prasanna GS; Reddy K; Kumar RK; Shivaprakash S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Mar; 14(2):217-21. PubMed ID: 23811648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Fluid absorbency of retraction cords after soaking in aluminum chloride solution.
    Runyan DA; Reddy TG; Shimoda LM
    J Prosthet Dent; 1988 Dec; 60(6):676-8. PubMed ID: 3060598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of the effect of different medicaments on surface reproduction of two commercially available Polyvinyl Siloxane impression materials - An Invitro Study.
    Singh R; Singh J; Gambhir RS; Singh R; Nanda S
    J Clin Exp Dent; 2013 Jul; 5(3):e138-43. PubMed ID: 24455069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of mixing technique on shrinkage rate of one polyether and two polyvinyl siloxane impression materials.
    Lampé I; Marton S; Hegedüs C
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(5):590. PubMed ID: 15543917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The influence of implant placement depth and impression material on the stability of an open tray impression coping.
    Linkevicius T; Svediene O; Vindasiute E; Puisys A; Linkeviciene L
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Oct; 108(4):238-43. PubMed ID: 23031730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluation of material waste, dimensional stability, and detail reproduction of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials mixed with different mixing tips.
    Maluly-Proni AT; Delben JA; Briso ALF; Marson FC; Dos Santos PH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 May; 127(5):759-764. PubMed ID: 33454110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A clinical comparison of cordless and conventional displacement systems regarding clinical performance and impression quality.
    Acar Ö; Erkut S; Özçelik TB; Ozdemır E; Akçil M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 May; 111(5):388-94. PubMed ID: 24360008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparative evaluation of three gingival displacement materials for efficacy in tissue management and dimensional accuracy.
    Gajbhiye V; Banerjee R; Jaiswal P; Chandak A; Radke U
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2019; 19(2):173-179. PubMed ID: 31040552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
    Thongthammachat S; Moore BK; Barco MT; Hovijitra S; Brown DT; Andres CJ
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Evaluation of gingival inflammation related to different retraction agents].
    Sun XW; Sun GL; Xiao LJ
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Feb; 26(1):53-5. PubMed ID: 18357884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Pre- and post-set hydrophilicity of elastomeric impression materials.
    Michalakis KX; Bakopoulou A; Hirayama H; Garefis DP; Garefis PD
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(4):238-48. PubMed ID: 17559537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of plasma treatment on the wettability of elastomeric impression materials.
    Vassilakos N; Fernandes CP; Nilner K
    J Prosthet Dent; 1993 Aug; 70(2):165-71. PubMed ID: 8371180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Sulcus depth reproduction with polyvinyl siloxane impression material: effects of hydrophilicity and impression temperature.
    Takahashi H; Finger WJ; Kurokawa R; Furukawa M; Komatsu M
    Quintessence Int; 2010 Mar; 41(3):e43-50. PubMed ID: 20213014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effect of various chemical agents used in gingival retraction systems on smear layer: Scanning electron microscope study.
    Lahoti KS
    Contemp Clin Dent; 2016; 7(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 27041896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of provisional luting agents on polyvinyl siloxane impression material.
    Jones RH; Cook GS; Moon MG
    J Prosthet Dent; 1996 Apr; 75(4):360-3. PubMed ID: 8642519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Digital assessment of properties of the three different generations of dental elastomeric impression materials.
    Singer L; Habib SI; Shalaby HE; Saniour SH; Bourauel C
    BMC Oral Health; 2022 Sep; 22(1):379. PubMed ID: 36064393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. In vitro kinetic study of absorbency of retraction cords.
    Csempesz F; Vág J; Fazekas A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Jan; 89(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 12589285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Factors affecting the accuracy of elastometric impression materials.
    Chen SY; Liang WM; Chen FN
    J Dent; 2004 Nov; 32(8):603-9. PubMed ID: 15476954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.