These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37803978)

  • 41. Synthesis of a novel injectable alginate impression material and impression accuracy evaluation.
    Liu X; Wang X; Wu J; Luo J; Wang Y; Li Q
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2022 Dec; 40(6):662-667. PubMed ID: 36416318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Effects of pre-soaked retraction cords on the microcirculation of the human gingival margin.
    Fazekas A; Csempesz F; Csabai Z; Vág J
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):343-8. PubMed ID: 12120770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. [Rheological properties of elastomeric impression materials].
    Kikuchi M
    Aichi Gakuin Daigaku Shigakkai Shi; 1990 Dec; 28(4):1287-302. PubMed ID: 2135157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Polyvinyl siloxane impression materials: a review of properties and techniques.
    Chee WW; Donovan TE
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Nov; 68(5):728-32. PubMed ID: 1432791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Dimensional changes and pressure of dental stones set in silicone rubber impressions.
    Teraoka F; Takahashi J
    Dent Mater; 2000 Mar; 16(2):145-9. PubMed ID: 11203536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Evaluation of Gingival Displacement with Aluminum Chloride and Naphazoline Hydrochloride: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    de Carvalho WF; Junior LCV; Junior HFB; Suguiura TPDS; Previdelli ITS; Sábio S
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2021 Feb; 29(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 33026719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Effect of five brands of latex gloves on the setting time of polyvinyl siloxane putty impression materials.
    Ravikumar CM; Sangur R
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(2):209-12. PubMed ID: 22945711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. [Some properties of hydrophilic addition-type silicone impression materials].
    Tokushima T; Nagayama K; Tawaragi T; Hashimoto H
    Meikai Daigaku Shigaku Zasshi; 1989; 18(2):205-12. PubMed ID: 2489668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The effect of tray selection, viscosity of impression material, and sequence of pour on the accuracy of dies made from dual-arch impressions.
    Ceyhan JA; Johnson GH; Lepe X
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Aug; 90(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 12886207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Bleeding Index and Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein 1 as Gingival Inflammation Parameters after Chemical-Mechanical Retraction Procedure.
    Igic M; Kostic M; Basic J; Krunic N; Pejcic A; Gligorijevic N; Milic Lemic A
    Med Princ Pract; 2020; 29(5):492-498. PubMed ID: 32241014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Comparison of elastomeric impression materials used in fixed prosthodontics.
    Ciesco JN; Malone WF; Sandrik JL; Mazur B
    J Prosthet Dent; 1981 Jan; 45(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 7007629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Reproducibility of sterilized rubber impressions.
    Abdelaziz KM; Hassan AM; Hodges JS
    Braz Dent J; 2004; 15(3):209-13. PubMed ID: 15798825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [Influence of autoclave sterilization on dimensional stability and detail reproduction of 5 additional silicone impression materials].
    Xu TK; Sun ZH; Jiang Y
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2012 Mar; 47(3):182-5. PubMed ID: 22800674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Prevention of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and hepatitis B. Part III: Disinfection of hydrophilic silicone rubber impression materials.
    Minagi S; Kohada A; Akagawa Y; Tsuru H
    J Prosthet Dent; 1990 Oct; 64(4):463-5. PubMed ID: 2121964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Efficacy of tray adhesives for the adhesion of elastomer rubber impression materials to impression modeling plastics for border molding.
    Nishigawa G; Sato T; Suenaga K; Minagi S
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Feb; 79(2):140-4. PubMed ID: 9513098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Comparative study of the polyvinyl siloxane technique with resin-splinted transfer copings used for multiple implant abutment impressions.
    Ferreira VF; Barboza EP; Gouvêa CV; Bianchini GM; Mussallem F; Carvalho WR
    Implant Dent; 2012 Feb; 21(1):72-6. PubMed ID: 22214989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Efficacy of Different Gingival Displacement Materials in the Management of Gingival Sulcus Width: A Comparative Study.
    Rathod A; Jacob SS; MAlqahtani A; Valsan I; Majeed R; Premnath A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Jun; 22(6):703-706. PubMed ID: 34393130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Effects of different retraction medicaments on gingival tissue.
    Akca EA; Yildirim E; Dalkiz M; Yavuzyilmaz H; Beydemir B
    Quintessence Int; 2006 Jan; 37(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 16429704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Comparison of impression materials for direct multi-implant impressions.
    Wee AG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Mar; 83(3):323-31. PubMed ID: 10709042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Visual observation of the dynamic flow of elastomer rubber impression material between the impression tray and oral mucosa while seating the impression tray.
    Nishigawa G; Natsuaki N; Maruo Y; Okamoto M; Minagi S
    J Oral Rehabil; 2003 Jun; 30(6):608-13. PubMed ID: 12787458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.