133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37805051)
1. The 51-60 cm H
Loh-Doyle JC; Markarian E; Boyd SD; Ginsberg D
Urology; 2024 Jan; 183():221-227. PubMed ID: 37805051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Is Removal of the Pressure-regulating Balloon Necessary After Artificial Urinary Sphincter Cuff Erosion?
Rozanski AT; Viers BR; Shakir NA; Pagliara TJ; Scott JM; Morey AF
Urology; 2018 Mar; 113():225-229. PubMed ID: 29155193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Predictors of Device-related Complications After Exchange of the Pressure-regulating Balloon in Men With an Artificial Urinary Sphincter.
Loh-Doyle JC; Nazemi A; Ashrafi A; Doumanian LR; Ginsberg DA; Boyd SD
Urology; 2020 Jan; 135():154-158. PubMed ID: 31585200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Erosion rates of 3.5-cm artificial urinary sphincter cuffs are similar to larger cuffs.
McKibben MJ; Shakir N; Fuchs JS; Scott JM; Morey AF
BJU Int; 2019 Feb; 123(2):335-341. PubMed ID: 30007096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Causes of Artificial Urinary Sphincter Failure and Strategies for Surgical Revision: Implications of Device Component Survival.
Srivastava A; Joice GA; Patel HD; Manka MG; Sopko NA; Wright EJ
Eur Urol Focus; 2019 Sep; 5(5):887-893. PubMed ID: 29545058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intentionally retained pressure-regulating balloon in artificial urinary sphincter revision.
Köhler TS; Benson A; Ost L; Wilson SK; Brant WO
J Sex Med; 2013 Oct; 10(10):2566-70. PubMed ID: 22974168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Efficacy of Pressure Regulating Balloon Exchange in Men With Post Artificial Urinary Sphincter Persistent or Recurrent Stress Urinary Incontinence.
Moses RA; Keihani S; Craig JR; Basilius J; Hotaling JM; Lenherr SM; Brant WO; Myers JB
Urology; 2019 Jan; 123():252-257. PubMed ID: 30201300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Immediate and Long-term Outcomes of Lateral Retroperitoneal Pressure Regulating Balloon Placement During Artificial Urinary Sphincter Implantation.
Markarian E; Boyd SD; Ginsberg D; Loh-Doyle J
Urology; 2024 Jan; 183():250-255. PubMed ID: 37926382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Is Risk of Artificial Urethral Sphincter Cuff Erosion Higher in Patients with Penile Prosthesis?
Sundaram V; Cordon BH; Hofer MD; Morey AF
J Sex Med; 2016 Sep; 13(9):1432-1437. PubMed ID: 27555513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of previous urethroplasty on the outcome after artificial urinary sphincter implantation: a prospective evaluation.
Sayedahmed K; Olianas R; Kaftan B; Omar M; El Shazly M; Burger M; Mayr R; Rosenhammer B
World J Urol; 2020 Jan; 38(1):183-191. PubMed ID: 30980093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pressure Regulating Balloon Herniation: A Correctable Cause of Artificial Urinary Sphincter Malfunction.
Khouri RK; Baumgarten AS; Ortiz NM; Ward EE; Baker RC; VanDyke ME; Yi YA; Hudak SJ; Morey AF
Urology; 2020 May; 139():188-192. PubMed ID: 32057792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Combined inflatable penile prosthesis-artificial urinary sphincter implantation: no increased risk of adverse events compared to single or staged device implantation.
Segal RL; Cabrini MR; Harris ED; Mostwin JL; Bivalacqua TJ; Burnett AL
J Urol; 2013 Dec; 190(6):2183-8. PubMed ID: 23831315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Proof of concept: Exposing the myth of urethral atrophy after artificial urinary sphincter via assessment of circumferential recovery after capsulotomy and intraoperative pressure profiling of the pressure regulating balloon.
Pearlman AM; Rasper AM; Terlecki RP
Investig Clin Urol; 2018 Jul; 59(4):275-279. PubMed ID: 29984343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Early Revision after Artificial Urinary Sphincter Implantation Does Not Impair the Long-Term Treatment Success.
Sayedahmed K; Rosenhammer B; Burger M; Goßler C
Urol Int; 2022; 106(3):261-268. PubMed ID: 34289484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Synchronous Ipsilateral High Submuscular Placement of Prosthetic Balloons and Reservoirs.
Kavoussi NL; Hofer MD; Viers BR; Cordon BH; Mooney RP; Pagliara TJ; Scott JM; Morey AF
J Sex Med; 2017 Feb; 14(2):264-268. PubMed ID: 28089244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Tandem cuff artificial urinary sphincter as a salvage procedure following failed primary sphincter placement for the treatment of post-prostatectomy incontinence.
DiMarco DS; Elliott DS
J Urol; 2003 Oct; 170(4 Pt 1):1252-4. PubMed ID: 14501735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Impact of Urethral Risk Factors on Transcorporeal Artificial Urinary Sphincter Erosion Rates and Device Survival.
Mock S; Dmochowski RR; Brown ET; Reynolds WS; Kaufman MR; Milam DF
J Urol; 2015 Dec; 194(6):1692-6. PubMed ID: 26141851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Do larger cuff sizes with artificial urinary sphincter placement increase the risk of leakage after placement?
Otis-Chapados S; de Los Reyes T; Mousa A; Fervaha G; Radomski SB
Can J Urol; 2023 Feb; 30(1):11419-11423. PubMed ID: 36779948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Urethral atrophy after implantation of an artificial urinary sphincter: fact or fiction?
Bugeja S; Ivaz SL; Frost A; Andrich DE; Mundy AR
BJU Int; 2016 Apr; 117(4):669-76. PubMed ID: 26384584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Functional outcomes of artificial urinary sphincter implantation with distal bulbar double cuff in men with and without a history of external beam radiotherapy: an analysis of a prospective database.
Maurer V; Marks P; Dahlem R; Rosenbaum CM; Meyer CP; Riechardt S; Fisch M; Ludwig T
BJU Int; 2019 Dec; 124(6):1040-1046. PubMed ID: 31351030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
