These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37805306)

  • 1. Influencing factors of examiner: Examples from certificated orthodontists board examination.
    Chen TC; Hung YJ; Chen TC; Lo FY; Wu HY; Lai EH
    J Formos Med Assoc; 2024 Apr; 123(4):461-466. PubMed ID: 37805306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Look at Demographics and Transition to Virtual Assessments: An Analysis of Bias in the American Board of Surgery General Surgery Certifying Exams.
    Ibáñez B; Jones AT; Jeyarajah DR; Dent DL; Prendergast C; Barry CL
    J Surg Educ; 2024 Apr; 81(4):578-588. PubMed ID: 38402095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Investigating possible ethnicity and sex bias in clinical examiners: an analysis of data from the MRCP(UK) PACES and nPACES examinations.
    McManus IC; Elder AT; Dacre J
    BMC Med Educ; 2013 Jul; 13():103. PubMed ID: 23899223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is There Gender Bias on the American Board of Surgery General Surgery Certifying Examination?
    Ong TQ; Kopp JP; Jones AT; Malangoni MA
    J Surg Res; 2019 May; 237():131-135. PubMed ID: 30917895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is There Evidence of Gender Bias in the Oral Examination for Initial Certification by the American Board of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation?
    Driscoll SW; Robinson LR; Raddatz MM; Kinney CL
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2019 Jun; 98(6):512-515. PubMed ID: 30614831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Examiner effect on the objective structured clinical exam - a study at five medical schools.
    Schleicher I; Leitner K; Juenger J; Moeltner A; Ruesseler M; Bender B; Sterz J; Schuettler KF; Koenig S; Kreuder JG
    BMC Med Educ; 2017 Apr; 17(1):71. PubMed ID: 28438196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of examiner differences on KIG-classification when assessing malocclusions.
    Gesch D; Kirbschus A; Schröder W; Bernhardt O; Proff P; Bayerlein T; Gedrange T; Kocher T
    J Orofac Orthop; 2006 Mar; 67(2):81-91. PubMed ID: 16570130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interexaminer agreement on the American Board of Emergency Medicine oral certification examination.
    Bianchi L; Gallagher EJ; Korte R; Ham HP
    Ann Emerg Med; 2003 Jun; 41(6):859-64. PubMed ID: 12764343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Inter-rater reliability in clinical assessments: do examiner pairings influence candidate ratings?
    Faherty A; Counihan T; Kropmans T; Finn Y
    BMC Med Educ; 2020 May; 20(1):147. PubMed ID: 32393228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of patient factors influencing the selection of an orthodontist, general dentist, or direct-to-consumer aligners.
    Olson JC; Shroff B; Carrico C; Boyle J; Lindauer SJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2020 Apr; 157(4):526-532.e2. PubMed ID: 32241359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interrater Reliability in the American Board of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Part II Certification Examination: Impact of a New Assessment Design.
    Kinney CL; Raddatz MM; Robinson LR; Garrison CJ; Sabharwal S
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2022 May; 101(5):468-472. PubMed ID: 34347627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. "On the same page"? The effect of GP examiner feedback on differences in rating severity in clinical assessments: a pre/post intervention study.
    Sturman N; Ostini R; Wong WY; Zhang J; David M
    BMC Med Educ; 2017 Jun; 17(1):101. PubMed ID: 28587597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. MRCGP CSA: are the examiners biased, favouring their own by sex, ethnicity, and degree source?
    Denney ML; Freeman A; Wakeford R
    Br J Gen Pract; 2013 Nov; 63(616):e718-25. PubMed ID: 24267854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of clinical competence on the Emergency Medicine Specialty Certification Examination: the validity of examiner ratings of simulated clinical encounters.
    Maatsch JL
    Ann Emerg Med; 1981 Oct; 10(10):504-7. PubMed ID: 7283213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pass/fail decisions and standards: the impact of differential examiner stringency on OSCE outcomes.
    Homer M
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2022 May; 27(2):457-473. PubMed ID: 35230590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Performance of dental students, orthodontic residents, and orthodontists for classification of midpalatal suture maturation stages on cone-beam computed tomography scans - a preliminary study.
    Chhatwani S; Arman A; Möhlhenrich SC; Ludwig B; Jackowski J; Danesh G
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Mar; 24(1):373. PubMed ID: 38519965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Inter-examiner variability in orthodontic treatment decisions for Danish children with 'borderline' treatment need.
    Baelum V; Borchorst E; Buch H; Dømgaard P; Hartig LE
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Apr; 34(2):250-6. PubMed ID: 21252189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The sights and insights of examiners in objective structured clinical examinations.
    Chong L; Taylor S; Haywood M; Adelstein BA; Shulruf B
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2017; 14():34. PubMed ID: 29278906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Orthodontic board certifications: Global perspectives, challenges, and evolving trends.
    Pangrazio-Kulbersh V; Machado-Cruz R; Liou EJ; Vaid NR; Graber LW
    J World Fed Orthod; 2022 Apr; 11(2):49-52. PubMed ID: 35236638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.