BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

369 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37805453)

  • 1. Transcription factor-binding k-mer analysis clarifies the cell type dependency of binding specificities and cis-regulatory SNPs in humans.
    Tahara S; Tsuchiya T; Matsumoto H; Ozaki H
    BMC Genomics; 2023 Oct; 24(1):597. PubMed ID: 37805453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cell-type specificity of ChIP-predicted transcription factor binding sites.
    Håndstad T; Rye M; Močnik R; Drabløs F; Sætrom P
    BMC Genomics; 2012 Aug; 13():372. PubMed ID: 22863112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A novel
    Guo Y; Tian K; Zeng H; Guo X; Gifford DK
    Genome Res; 2018 Jun; 28(6):891-900. PubMed ID: 29654070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A map of direct TF-DNA interactions in the human genome.
    Gheorghe M; Sandve GK; Khan A; Chèneby J; Ballester B; Mathelier A
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2019 Feb; 47(4):e21. PubMed ID: 30517703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Statistics of protein-DNA binding and the total number of binding sites for a transcription factor in the mammalian genome.
    Kuznetsov VA; Singh O; Jenjaroenpun P
    BMC Genomics; 2010 Feb; 11 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S12. PubMed ID: 20158869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. High-resolution DNA-binding specificity analysis of yeast transcription factors.
    Zhu C; Byers KJ; McCord RP; Shi Z; Berger MF; Newburger DE; Saulrieta K; Smith Z; Shah MV; Radhakrishnan M; Philippakis AA; Hu Y; De Masi F; Pacek M; Rolfs A; Murthy T; Labaer J; Bulyk ML
    Genome Res; 2009 Apr; 19(4):556-66. PubMed ID: 19158363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. MOCCS: Clarifying DNA-binding motif ambiguity using ChIP-Seq data.
    Ozaki H; Iwasaki W
    Comput Biol Chem; 2016 Aug; 63():62-72. PubMed ID: 26971251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. High resolution models of transcription factor-DNA affinities improve in vitro and in vivo binding predictions.
    Agius P; Arvey A; Chang W; Noble WS; Leslie C
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2010 Sep; 6(9):. PubMed ID: 20838582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Non-targeted transcription factors motifs are a systemic component of ChIP-seq datasets.
    Worsley Hunt R; Wasserman WW
    Genome Biol; 2014 Jul; 15(7):412. PubMed ID: 25070602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improving analysis of transcription factor binding sites within ChIP-Seq data based on topological motif enrichment.
    Worsley Hunt R; Mathelier A; Del Peso L; Wasserman WW
    BMC Genomics; 2014 Jun; 15(1):472. PubMed ID: 24927817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. MixChIP: a probabilistic method for cell type specific protein-DNA binding analysis.
    Rautio S; Lähdesmäki H
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Dec; 16():413. PubMed ID: 26703974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Discovery of cell-type specific DNA motif grammar in cis-regulatory elements using random Forest.
    Wang X; Lin P; Ho JWK
    BMC Genomics; 2018 Jan; 19(Suppl 1):929. PubMed ID: 29363433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Revealing transcription factor and histone modification co-localization and dynamics across cell lines by integrating ChIP-seq and RNA-seq data.
    Zhang L; Xue G; Liu J; Li Q; Wang Y
    BMC Genomics; 2018 Dec; 19(Suppl 10):914. PubMed ID: 30598100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improved linking of motifs to their TFs using domain information.
    Baumgarten N; Schmidt F; Schulz MH
    Bioinformatics; 2020 Mar; 36(6):1655-1662. PubMed ID: 31742324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sequence and chromatin determinants of cell-type-specific transcription factor binding.
    Arvey A; Agius P; Noble WS; Leslie C
    Genome Res; 2012 Sep; 22(9):1723-34. PubMed ID: 22955984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Curated collection of yeast transcription factor DNA binding specificity data reveals novel structural and gene regulatory insights.
    Gordân R; Murphy KF; McCord RP; Zhu C; Vedenko A; Bulyk ML
    Genome Biol; 2011 Dec; 12(12):R125. PubMed ID: 22189060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Identification of breast cancer associated variants that modulate transcription factor binding.
    Liu Y; Walavalkar NM; Dozmorov MG; Rich SS; Civelek M; Guertin MJ
    PLoS Genet; 2017 Sep; 13(9):e1006761. PubMed ID: 28957321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative analysis of models in predicting the effects of SNPs on TF-DNA binding using large-scale in vitro and in vivo data.
    Han D; Li Y; Wang L; Liang X; Miao Y; Li W; Wang S; Wang Z
    Brief Bioinform; 2024 Jan; 25(2):. PubMed ID: 38517697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. ChIPSummitDB: a ChIP-seq-based database of human transcription factor binding sites and the topological arrangements of the proteins bound to them.
    Czipa E; Schiller M; Nagy T; Kontra L; Steiner L; Koller J; Pálné-Szén O; Barta E
    Database (Oxford); 2020 Jan; 2020():. PubMed ID: 31942977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing the model transferability for prediction of transcription factor binding sites based on chromatin accessibility.
    Liu S; Zibetti C; Wan J; Wang G; Blackshaw S; Qian J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Jul; 18(1):355. PubMed ID: 28750606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.