150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37806102)
1. Neural envelope tracking predicts speech intelligibility and hearing aid benefit in children with hearing loss.
Van Hirtum T; Somers B; Dieudonné B; Verschueren E; Wouters J; Francart T
Hear Res; 2023 Nov; 439():108893. PubMed ID: 37806102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of stimulus intensity on neural envelope tracking.
Verschueren E; Vanthornhout J; Francart T
Hear Res; 2021 Apr; 403():108175. PubMed ID: 33494033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of Speech-Evoked Envelope Following Responses as an Objective Aided Outcome Measure: Effect of Stimulus Level, Bandwidth, and Amplification in Adults With Hearing Loss.
Easwar V; Purcell DW; Aiken SJ; Parsa V; Scollie SD
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):635-52. PubMed ID: 26226606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Delta-band neural envelope tracking predicts speech intelligibility in noise in preschoolers.
Van Hirtum T; Somers B; Verschueren E; Dieudonné B; Francart T
Hear Res; 2023 Jul; 434():108785. PubMed ID: 37172414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of sensorineural hearing loss and personal hearing AIDS on cortical event-related potential and behavioral measures of speech-sound processing.
Korczak PA; Kurtzberg D; Stapells DR
Ear Hear; 2005 Apr; 26(2):165-85. PubMed ID: 15809543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Effect of Stimulus Choice on an EEG-Based Objective Measure of Speech Intelligibility.
Verschueren E; Vanthornhout J; Francart T
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(6):1586-1597. PubMed ID: 33136634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessing Speech Audibility via Syllabic-Rate Neural Responses in Adults and Children With and Without Hearing Loss.
Pendyala V; Sethares W; Easwar V
Trends Hear; 2024; 28():23312165241227815. PubMed ID: 38545698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Speech intelligibility benefits of hearing AIDS at various input levels.
Kuk F; Lau CC; Korhonen P; Crose B
J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Mar; 26(3):275-88. PubMed ID: 25751695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Investigation of Extended Bandwidth Hearing Aid Amplification on Speech Intelligibility and Sound Quality in Adults with Mild-to-Moderate Hearing Loss.
Seeto A; Searchfield GD
J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Mar; 29(3):243-254. PubMed ID: 29488874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Low-Level Speech Recognition of Children with Hearing Aids.
Wolfe J; Duke M; Miller S; Schafer E; Jones C; Rakita L; Dunn A; Battles J; Neumann S; Manning J
J Am Acad Audiol; 2022 Apr; 33(4):196-205. PubMed ID: 34758503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Speech recognition performance of patients with sensorineural hearing loss under unaided and aided conditions using linear and compression hearing AIDS.
Shanks JE; Wilson RH; Larson V; Williams D
Ear Hear; 2002 Aug; 23(4):280-90. PubMed ID: 12195170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of directional sound processing and listener's motivation on EEG responses to continuous noisy speech: Do normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners differ?
Mirkovic B; Debener S; Schmidt J; Jaeger M; Neher T
Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 377():260-270. PubMed ID: 31003037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hearing Aids Do Not Alter Cortical Entrainment to Speech at Audible Levels in Mild-to-Moderately Hearing-Impaired Subjects.
Vanheusden FJ; Kegler M; Ireland K; Georga C; Simpson DM; Reichenbach T; Bell SL
Front Hum Neurosci; 2020; 14():109. PubMed ID: 32317951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Audibility-Based Hearing Aid Fitting Criteria for Children With Mild Bilateral Hearing Loss.
McCreery RW; Walker EA; Stiles DJ; Spratford M; Oleson JJ; Lewis DE
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch; 2020 Jan; 51(1):55-67. PubMed ID: 31913801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of speech intelligibility and subjective quality with hearing-aid processing in older adults with hearing loss.
Arehart KH; Chon SH; Lundberg EMH; Harvey LO; Kates JM; Anderson MC; Rallapalli VH; Souza PE
Int J Audiol; 2022 Jan; 61(1):46-58. PubMed ID: 33913795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Predicting Hearing aid Benefit Using Speech-Evoked Envelope Following Responses in Children With Hearing Loss.
Easwar V; Purcell D; Wright T
Trends Hear; 2023; 27():23312165231151468. PubMed ID: 36946195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Outcomes of Hearing Aid Use by Individuals with Unilateral Sensorineural Hearing Loss (USNHL).
Bishop CE; Hamadain E; Galster JA; Johnson MF; Spankovich C; Windmill I
J Am Acad Audiol; 2017; 28(10):941-949. PubMed ID: 29130442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effects of hearing aid use on listening effort and mental fatigue associated with sustained speech processing demands.
Hornsby BW
Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):523-34. PubMed ID: 23426091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Speech intelligibility of children with cochlear implants, tactile aids, or hearing aids.
Osberger MJ; Maso M; Sam LK
J Speech Hear Res; 1993 Feb; 36(1):186-203. PubMed ID: 8450658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intelligibility of modified speech for young listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
Uchanski RM; Geers AE; Protopapas A
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2002 Oct; 45(5):1027-38. PubMed ID: 12381058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
