These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37806102)

  • 21. The Effects of Manufacturer's Prefit and Real-Ear Fitting on the Predicted Speech Perception of Children with Severe to Profound Hearing Loss.
    Quar TK; Umat C; Chew YY
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 May; 30(5):346-356. PubMed ID: 30461383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Hearing Thresholds, Speech Recognition, and Audibility as Indicators for Modifying Intervention in Children With Hearing Aids.
    Wiseman KB; McCreery RW; Walker EA
    Ear Hear; 2023 Jul-Aug 01; 44(4):787-802. PubMed ID: 36627755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Predicted and measured speech recognition performance in noise with linear amplification.
    Magnusson L; Karlsson M; Leijon A
    Ear Hear; 2001 Feb; 22(1):46-57. PubMed ID: 11271975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Tracking of Noise Tolerance to Measure Hearing Aid Benefit.
    Kuk F; Seper E; Lau CC; Korhonen P
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Sep; 28(8):698-707. PubMed ID: 28906241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Hearing-Aid Directionality Improves Neural Speech Tracking in Older Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
    Petersen EB
    Trends Hear; 2022; 26():23312165221099894. PubMed ID: 35730193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. An overview of the HASPI and HASQI metrics for predicting speech intelligibility and speech quality for normal hearing, hearing loss, and hearing aids.
    Kates JM; Arehart KH
    Hear Res; 2022 Dec; 426():108608. PubMed ID: 36137862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A comparison of threshold-based fitting strategies for nonlinear hearing aids.
    Stelmachowicz PG; Dalzell S; Peterson D; Kopun J; Lewis DL; Hoover BE
    Ear Hear; 1998 Apr; 19(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 9562535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluation of performance of hearing aid users using Acoustic Change Complex (ACC) and behavioral measures.
    Shalaby AA; El-Kabarity RH; Shafik NA; Abd-Alfattah M
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2022 Oct; 161():111271. PubMed ID: 35988371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Predictors of Hearing-Aid Outcomes.
    Lopez-Poveda EA; Johannesen PT; Pérez-González P; Blanco JL; Kalluri S; Edwards B
    Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517730526. PubMed ID: 28929903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Frequency-lowering processing to improve speech-in-noise intelligibility in patients with age-related hearing loss.
    Bruno R; Freni F; Portelli D; Alberti G; Gazia F; Meduri A; Galletti F; Galletti B
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Oct; 278(10):3697-3706. PubMed ID: 33083865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Perception of Hearing Aid-Processed Speech in Individuals with Late-Onset Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder.
    Mathai JP; Appu S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015; 26(10):815-23. PubMed ID: 26554487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Neural envelope tracking as a measure of speech understanding in cochlear implant users.
    Verschueren E; Somers B; Francart T
    Hear Res; 2019 Mar; 373():23-31. PubMed ID: 30580236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cortical auditory-evoked potentials (CAEPs) in adults in response to filtered speech stimuli.
    Carter L; Dillon H; Seymour J; Seeto M; Van Dun B
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Oct; 24(9):807-22. PubMed ID: 24224988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Cognitive Abilities Contribute to Spectro-Temporal Discrimination in Children Who Are Hard of Hearing.
    Kirby BJ; Spratford M; Klein KE; McCreery RW
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(3):645-650. PubMed ID: 30130295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Relationships among speech perception, production, language, hearing loss, and age in children with impaired hearing.
    Blamey PJ; Sarant JZ; Paatsch LE; Barry JG; Bow CP; Wales RJ; Wright M; Psarros C; Rattigan K; Tooher R
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2001 Apr; 44(2):264-85. PubMed ID: 11324650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effects of noise reduction on speech intelligibility, perceived listening effort, and personal preference in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Brons I; Houben R; Dreschler WA
    Trends Hear; 2014 Oct; 18():. PubMed ID: 25315377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Prediction of Speech Intelligibility by Means of EEG Responses to Sentences in Noise.
    Muncke J; Kuruvila I; Hoppe U
    Front Neurosci; 2022; 16():876421. PubMed ID: 35720724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Neural tracking of speech envelope does not unequivocally reflect intelligibility.
    Kösem A; Dai B; McQueen JM; Hagoort P
    Neuroimage; 2023 May; 272():120040. PubMed ID: 36935084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of multi-channel compression time constants on subjectively perceived sound quality and speech intelligibility.
    Hansen M
    Ear Hear; 2002 Aug; 23(4):369-80. PubMed ID: 12195179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Using a Digital Language Processor to Quantify the Auditory Environment and the Effect of Hearing Aids for Adults with Hearing Loss.
    Klein KE; Wu YH; Stangl E; Bentler RA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Apr; 29(4):279-291. PubMed ID: 29664722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.