180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37806841)
1. Digital Rectal Examination Is Not a Useful Screening Test for Prostate Cancer.
Krilaviciute A; Becker N; Lakes J; Radtke JP; Kuczyk M; Peters I; Harke NN; Debus J; Koerber SA; Herkommer K; Gschwend JE; Meissner VH; Benner A; Seibold P; Kristiansen G; Hadaschik B; Arsov C; Schimmöller L; Giesel FL; Antoch G; Makowski M; Wacker F; Schlemmer HP; Kaaks R; Albers P
Eur Urol Oncol; 2023 Dec; 6(6):566-573. PubMed ID: 37806841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Digital rectal examination is barrier to population-based prostate cancer screening.
Nagler HM; Gerber EW; Homel P; Wagner JR; Norton J; Lebovitch S; Phillips JL
Urology; 2005 Jun; 65(6):1137-40. PubMed ID: 15922431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Use of low free to total PSA ratio in prostate cancer screening: detection rates, clinical and pathological findings in Brazilian men with serum PSA levels <4.0 ng/mL.
Faria EF; Carvalhal GF; dos Reis RB; Tobias-Machado M; Vieira RA; Reis LO; Nogueira L; Machado RD; Freitas CH; Magnabosco WJ; Mauad EC; Carvalho AL
BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11 Pt B):E653-7. PubMed ID: 22892057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The role of the digital rectal examination as diagnostic test for prostate cancer detection in obese patients.
Dell'Atti L
J BUON; 2015; 20(6):1601-5. PubMed ID: 26854458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prediction of prostate cancer risk: the role of prostate volume and digital rectal examination in the ERSPC risk calculators.
Roobol MJ; van Vugt HA; Loeb S; Zhu X; Bul M; Bangma CH; van Leenders AG; Steyerberg EW; Schröder FH
Eur Urol; 2012 Mar; 61(3):577-83. PubMed ID: 22104592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The role of the digital rectal examination in subsequent screening visits in the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer (ERSPC), Rotterdam.
Gosselaar C; Roobol MJ; Roemeling S; Schröder FH
Eur Urol; 2008 Sep; 54(3):581-8. PubMed ID: 18423977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A randomized trial of risk-adapted screening for prostate cancer in young men-Results of the first screening round of the PROBASE trial.
Arsov C; Albers P; Herkommer K; Gschwend J; Imkamp F; Peters I; Kuczyk M; Hadaschik B; Kristiansen G; Schimmöller L; Antoch G; Rummeny E; Wacker F; Schlemmer H; Benner A; Siener R; Kaaks R; Becker N
Int J Cancer; 2022 Jun; 150(11):1861-1869. PubMed ID: 35076933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparing the Performance of Digital Rectal Examination and Prostate-specific Antigen as a Screening Test for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Matsukawa A; Yanagisawa T; Bekku K; Kardoust Parizi M; Laukhtina E; Klemm J; Chiujdea S; Mori K; Kimura S; Fazekas T; Miszczyk M; Miki J; Kimura T; Karakiewicz PI; Rajwa P; Shariat SF
Eur Urol Oncol; 2024 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 38182488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Digital rectal examination and the diagnosis of prostate cancer--a study based on 8 years and three screenings within the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC), Rotterdam.
Gosselaar C; Roobol MJ; van den Bergh RC; Wolters T; Schröder FH
Eur Urol; 2009 Jan; 55(1):139-46. PubMed ID: 18406045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prostate health index (PHI) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) predictive models for prostate cancer in the Chinese population and the role of digital rectal examination-estimated prostate volume.
Chiu PK; Roobol MJ; Teoh JY; Lee WM; Yip SY; Hou SM; Bangma CH; Ng CF
Int Urol Nephrol; 2016 Oct; 48(10):1631-7. PubMed ID: 27349564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of the digital rectal examination as a screening test for prostate cancer. Rotterdam section of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer.
Schröder FH; van der Maas P; Beemsterboer P; Kruger AB; Hoedemaeker R; Rietbergen J; Kranse R
J Natl Cancer Inst; 1998 Dec; 90(23):1817-23. PubMed ID: 9839522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prostate-specific antigen-based early detection of prostate cancer--validation of screening without rectal examination.
Schröder FH; Roobol-Bouts M; Vis AN; van der Kwast T; Kranse R
Urology; 2001 Jan; 57(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 11164149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Relative contribution of digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasonography in interpreting serum prostate-specific antigen values for screening prostate cancer in Arab men.
Sheikh M; Sinan T; Kehinde EO; Hussein AY; Anim JT; Al-Hunayan AA
Ann Saudi Med; 2007; 27(2):73-8. PubMed ID: 17356323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Who Benefits from Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging After Suspicion of Prostate Cancer?
Morote J; Celma A; Roche S; de Torres IM; Mast R; Semedey ME; Regis L; Planas J
Eur Urol Oncol; 2019 Nov; 2(6):664-669. PubMed ID: 31411977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Social ecological predictors of prostate-specific antigen blood test and digital rectal examination in black American men.
Woods VD; Montgomery SB; Herring RP; Gardner RW; Stokols D
J Natl Med Assoc; 2006 Apr; 98(4):492-504. PubMed ID: 16623061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Digital Rectal Examination and Serum Prostate Specific Antigen in the Early Detection of Prostate Cancer: Results of a Multicenter Clinical Trial of 6,630 Men.
Catalona WJ; Richie JP; Ahmann FR; Hudson MA; Scardino PT; Flanigan RC; DeKernion JB; Ratliff TL; Kavoussi LR; Dalkin BL; Waters WB; MacFarlane MT; Southwick PC
J Urol; 2017 Feb; 197(2S):S200-S207. PubMed ID: 28012755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Digital rectal examination in primary care is important for early detection of prostate cancer: a retrospective cohort analysis study.
Walsh AL; Considine SW; Thomas AZ; Lynch TH; Manecksha RP
Br J Gen Pract; 2014 Dec; 64(629):e783-7. PubMed ID: 25452543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Digital Rectal Examination in Stockholm3 Biomarker-based Prostate Cancer Screening.
Andersson J; Palsdottir T; Lantz A; Aly M; Grönberg H; Egevad L; Eklund M; Nordström T
Eur Urol Open Sci; 2022 Oct; 44():69-75. PubMed ID: 36185581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Calculator for Prostate Cancer Risk 4 Years After an Initially Negative Screen: Findings from ERSPC Rotterdam.
Roobol MJ; Zhu X; Schröder FH; van Leenders GJ; van Schaik RH; Bangma CH; Steyerberg EW
Eur Urol; 2013 Apr; 63(4):627-33. PubMed ID: 22841675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Histological inflammation and risk of subsequent prostate cancer among men with initially elevated serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentration in the Finnish prostate cancer screening trial.
Yli-Hemminki TH; Laurila M; Auvinen A; Määttänen L; Huhtala H; Tammela TL; Kujala PM
BJU Int; 2013 Oct; 112(6):735-41. PubMed ID: 23746332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
