227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37807733)
21. Adding systematic biopsy to magnetic resonance ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy of the prostate in men with previous negative biopsy or enrolled in active surveillance programs: A prospective single center, randomized study.
Porreca A; Del Giudice F; Giampaoli M; D'Agostino D; Romagnoli D; Corsi P; Del Rosso A; Maggi M; Chung BI; Ferro M; de Cobelli O; Lucarelli G; Schiavina R; De Berardinis E; Sciarra A; Busetto GM
Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Sep; 99(37):e22059. PubMed ID: 32925739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Ipsilateral hemigland prostate biopsy may underestimate cancer burden in patients with unilateral mpMRI-visible lesions.
Phelps TE; Yilmaz EC; Harmon SA; Belue MJ; Shih JH; Garcia C; Hazen LA; Toubaji A; Merino MJ; Gurram S; Choyke PL; Wood BJ; Pinto PA; Turkbey B
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2023 Mar; 48(3):1079-1089. PubMed ID: 36526922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Using Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Scores to Select an Optimal Prostate Biopsy Method: A Secondary Analysis of the Trio Study.
Ahdoot M; Lebastchi AH; Long L; Wilbur AR; Gomella PT; Mehralivand S; Daneshvar MA; Yerram NK; O'Connor LP; Wang AZ; Gurram S; Bloom J; Siddiqui MM; Linehan WM; Merino M; Choyke PL; Pinsky P; Parnes H; Shih JH; Turkbey B; Wood BJ; Pinto PA;
Eur Urol Oncol; 2022 Apr; 5(2):176-186. PubMed ID: 33846112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Association Between Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Score for the Index Lesion and Multifocal, Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
Stabile A; Dell'Oglio P; De Cobelli F; Esposito A; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Brembilla G; Cristel G; Cardone G; Deho' F; Losa A; Suardi N; Gaboardi F; Del Maschio A; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 May; 1(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 31100225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The added value of systematic biopsy in men with suspicion of prostate cancer undergoing multiparametric MRI-targeted biopsy.
Mannaerts CK; Kajtazovic A; Lodeizen OAP; Gayet M; Engelbrecht MRW; Jager GJ; Wijkstra H; de Reijke TM; Beerlage HP
Urol Oncol; 2019 May; 37(5):298.e1-298.e9. PubMed ID: 30660493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Does previous prostate surgery affect multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging accuracy in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer? Results from a single institution series.
Pellegrino F; Stabile A; Mazzone E; Sorce G; Barletta F; De Angelis M; Brembilla G; Gandaglia G; De Cobelli F; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Prostate; 2022 Sep; 82(12):1170-1175. PubMed ID: 35538401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Positive Predictive Value of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 for the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Mazzone E; Stabile A; Pellegrino F; Basile G; Cignoli D; Cirulli GO; Sorce G; Barletta F; Scuderi S; Bravi CA; Cucchiara V; Fossati N; Gandaglia G; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Oct; 4(5):697-713. PubMed ID: 33358543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The Utility of Combined Target and Systematic Prostate Biopsies in the Diagnosis of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Using Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 Based on Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Kato D; Ozawa K; Takeuchi S; Kawase M; Kawase K; Nakai C; Takai M; Iinuma K; Nakane K; Kato H; Matsuo M; Suzui N; Miyazaki T; Koie T
Curr Oncol; 2021 Mar; 28(2):1294-1301. PubMed ID: 33809967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Gleason Grade Group Concordance between Systematic Template Combining Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion Targeted Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Specimens: A Comparison of Transperineal and Transrectal Approaches.
Wu S; Feldman AS; Kim MM; Lin SX; Cornejo KM; Harisinghani MG; Dahl DM; Wu CL
Urology; 2023 May; 175():151-156. PubMed ID: 36828261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Suboptimal Prediction of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Radical Prostatectomy Specimens by mpMRI-Targeted Biopsy.
Karsiyakali N; Ozgen MB; Ozveren B; Akbal C; Dincer A; Durak H; Turkeri L
Urology; 2021 Feb; 148():217-223. PubMed ID: 32871139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. An optimized prostate biopsy strategy in patients with a unilateral lesion on prostate magnetic resonance imaging avoids unnecessary biopsies.
Jager A; van Riel LAMJG; Postema AW; de Reijke TM; van der Sluis TM; Oddens JR
Ther Adv Urol; 2022; 14():17562872221111410. PubMed ID: 35924207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of Cancer Detection Rates Between TRUS-Guided Biopsy and MRI-Targeted Biopsy According to PSA Level in Biopsy-Naive Patients: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.
Choi YH; Kang MY; Sung HH; Jeon HG; Chang Jeong B; Seo SI; Jeon SS; Kim CK; Park BK; Lee HM
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2019 Feb; 17(1):e19-e25. PubMed ID: 30415878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. How to optimize follow-up in patients with a suspicious multiparametric MRI and a subsequent negative targeted prostate biopsy. Results from a large, single-institution series.
Barletta F; Stabile A; Mazzone E; Brembilla G; Sorce G; Pellegrino F; Scuderi S; Cannoletta D; Cirulli GO; Cucchiara V; Gandaglia G; De Cobelli F; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Urol Oncol; 2022 Mar; 40(3):103.e17-103.e24. PubMed ID: 34688534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Analysis of the relationship between PI-RADS scores and the pathological results of targeted biopsy based on MRI].
Wang YM; Shang JW; Dong L; Liang LH; Zhao RZ; Liang C; Wang SQ; Xia W; Cheng G; Hua LX
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2023 Nov; 45(11):942-947. PubMed ID: 37968079
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Transperineal multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion-targeted prostate biopsy combined with standard template improves perineural invasion detection.
Wu CL; Kim M; Wu S; Lin SX; Crotty RK; Harisinghani M; Feldman AS; Dahl DM
Hum Pathol; 2021 Nov; 117():101-107. PubMed ID: 34461132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Multiparametric-Magnetic Resonance/Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Prostate Biopsy Improves Agreement Between Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Gleason Score.
Porpiglia F; DE Luca S; Passera R; Manfredi M; Mele F; Bollito E; DE Pascale A; Cossu M; Aimar R; Veltri A
Anticancer Res; 2016 Sep; 36(9):4833-9. PubMed ID: 27630337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Does PSA level affect the choice of prostate puncture methods among MRI-ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy, transrectal ultrasound systematic biopsy or the combination of both?
Liu Y; Dong L; Xiang L; Zhou B; Wang H; Zhang Y; Xu G; Wu J; Wang S; Zhang Y; Xu H
Br J Radiol; 2021 Jul; 94(1123):20210312. PubMed ID: 34133228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Systematic versus Targeted Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Prostate Biopsy among Men with Visible Lesions.
Patel HD; Koehne EL; Shea SM; Fang AM; Gorbonos A; Quek ML; Flanigan RC; Goldberg A; Rais-Bahrami S; Gupta GN
J Urol; 2022 Jan; 207(1):108-117. PubMed ID: 34428091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Added value of randomised biopsy to multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy of the prostate in a contemporary cohort.
Chaloupka M; Pyrgidis N; Ebner B; Volz Y; Pfitzinger PL; Berg E; Enzinger B; Atzler M; Ivanova T; Clevert DA; Buchner A; Stief CG; Apfelbeck M
BJU Int; 2024 May; 133(5):548-554. PubMed ID: 38060339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Pan-segmental intraprostatic lesions involving mid-gland and apex of prostate (mid-apical lesions): assessing the true value of extreme apical biopsy cores.
Leyh-Bannurah SR; Boiko S; Beyersdorff D; Falkenbach F; Ekrutt J; Maurer T; Graefen M; Kachanov M; Budäus L
World J Urol; 2022 Jul; 40(7):1653-1659. PubMed ID: 35501610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
