192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37809250)
1. Accuracy of Anatomical Depictions in Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT)-Reconstructed Panoramic Projections Compared to Conventional Panoramic Radiographs: A Clinical Risk-Benefit Analysis.
Jadhav A; Desai NG; Tadinada A
Cureus; 2023 Sep; 15(9):e44723. PubMed ID: 37809250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Do CBCT scans alter surgical treatment plans? Comparison of preoperative surgical diagnosis using panoramic versus cone-beam CT images.
Wolff C; Mücke T; Wagenpfeil S; Kanatas A; Bissinger O; Deppe H
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 Oct; 44(10):1700-1705. PubMed ID: 27567358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Utility of Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scans in Diagnosing and Treating Anterior Lesions of the Maxilla and Mandible.
Muttanahally KS; Sheppard S; Yadav S; Tadinada A
Cureus; 2024 Jan; 16(1):e52804. PubMed ID: 38389599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Panoramic cone beam computed tomography.
Chang J; Zhou L; Wang S; Clifford Chao KS
Med Phys; 2012 May; 39(5):2930-46. PubMed ID: 22559664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative analysis of mandibular anatomical variations between panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography.
Neves FS; Nascimento MC; Oliveira ML; Almeida SM; Bóscolo FN
Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 18(4):419-24. PubMed ID: 23975215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Implant treatment planning regarding augmentation procedures: panoramic radiographs vs. cone beam computed tomography images.
Dagassan-Berndt DC; Zitzmann NU; Walter C; Schulze RK
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Aug; 27(8):1010-6. PubMed ID: 26227397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: recommendations for clinical use.
Jacobs R; Salmon B; Codari M; Hassan B; Bornstein MM
BMC Oral Health; 2018 May; 18(1):88. PubMed ID: 29764458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An in vitro comparison of subjective image quality of panoramic views acquired via 2D or 3D imaging.
Pittayapat P; Galiti D; Huang Y; Dreesen K; Schreurs M; Souza PC; Rubira-Bullen IR; Westphalen FH; Pauwels R; Kalema G; Willems G; Jacobs R
Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Jan; 17(1):293-300. PubMed ID: 22382448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of two cone beam computed tomographic systems versus panoramic imaging for localization of impacted maxillary canines and detection of root resorption.
Alqerban A; Jacobs R; Fieuws S; Willems G
Eur J Orthod; 2011 Feb; 33(1):93-102. PubMed ID: 21270321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Measurement accuracy and reliability of tooth length on conventional and CBCT reconstructed panoramic radiographs.
Flores-Mir C; Rosenblatt MR; Major PW; Carey JP; Heo G
Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(5):45-53. PubMed ID: 25715716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative efficacy of digital panoramic radiograph and cone beam computed tomography in locating mandibular foramen.
Alali Y; Mohammed WA; Aldrees AF; Alshamrani AM; Alabdullatif MA; Alhajri SA
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2024 Apr; 28(8):2996-3005. PubMed ID: 38708456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of cone beam computed tomography in periodontology.
Acar B; Kamburoğlu K
World J Radiol; 2014 May; 6(5):139-47. PubMed ID: 24876918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Automated measurement for image distortion analysis in 2D panoramic imaging of dental CBCT system: A phantom study.
Rabba JA; Suhaimi FM; Mat Jafri MZ; Jaafar HA; Osman ND
Radiography (Lond); 2023 May; 29(3):533-538. PubMed ID: 36913788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Planning of dental implant size with digital panoramic radiographs, CBCT-generated panoramic images, and CBCT cross-sectional images.
Correa LR; Spin-Neto R; Stavropoulos A; Schropp L; da Silveira HE; Wenzel A
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jun; 25(6):690-5. PubMed ID: 23442085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) an alternative to plain radiography in assessments of dental disease? A study of method agreement in a medically compromised patient population.
Lindfors N; Ekestubbe A; Frisk F; Lund H
Clin Oral Investig; 2024 Jan; 28(2):127. PubMed ID: 38289447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison between digital panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography for the identification of the mandibular canal as part of presurgical dental implant assessment.
Angelopoulos C; Thomas SL; Hechler S; Parissis N; Hlavacek M
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Oct; 66(10):2130-5. PubMed ID: 18848113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of incidental findings on cone beam computed tomographic and 2-dimensional images.
Crockett B; Broome A; Tawil P; Tyndall D
Gen Dent; 2023; 71(4):64-71. PubMed ID: 37358586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Calcification of the stylohyoid ligament in panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography among patients referred for dental implant treatment planning.
Mahdian M; Moghaddam EJ; Alzahrani A; Rengasamy K; Tadinada A
Implant Dent; 2014 Aug; 23(4):508-13. PubMed ID: 25033348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of linear measurements using cone beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography in dental implant treatment planning.
Luangchana P; Pornprasertsuk-Damrongsri S; Kiattavorncharoen S; Jirajariyavej B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(6):1287-94. PubMed ID: 26574854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Orthodontic treatment planning for impacted maxillary canines using conventional records versus 3D CBCT.
Alqerban A; Willems G; Bernaerts C; Vangastel J; Politis C; Jacobs R
Eur J Orthod; 2014 Dec; 36(6):698-707. PubMed ID: 24406479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
