These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37810449)

  • 1. Diagnostic accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography with modified grayscale range for detection of buccal cortical plate defects adjacent to dental implants.
    Yaghoobi S; Kajan ZD; Khosravifard N; Sigaroudi AK; Jouybari RM
    Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2023; 20():90. PubMed ID: 37810449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Efficacy of low-dose cone beam computed tomography and metal artifact reduction tool for assessment of peri-implant bone defects: an in vitro study.
    Nomier AS; Gaweesh YSE; Taalab MR; El Sadat SA
    BMC Oral Health; 2022 Dec; 22(1):615. PubMed ID: 36528573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography, dental magnetic resonance imaging, and intraoral radiography for detecting peri-implant bone defects at single zirconia implants-An in vitro study.
    Hilgenfeld T; Juerchott A; Deisenhofer UK; Krisam J; Rammelsberg P; Heiland S; Bendszus M; Schwindling FS
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Sep; 29(9):922-930. PubMed ID: 30112833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diagnostic Accuracy of Three Cone Beam Computed Tomography Systems and Periapical Radiography for Detection of Fenestration Around Dental Implants.
    Eskandarloo A; Saati S; Ardakani MP; Jamalpour M; Gholi Mezerji NM; Akheshteh V
    Contemp Clin Dent; 2018; 9(3):376-381. PubMed ID: 30166830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of detecting and measuring buccal bone thickness adjacent to titanium dental implants-a cone beam computed tomography in vitro study.
    Liedke GS; Spin-Neto R; da Silveira HED; Schropp L; Stavropoulos A; Wenzel A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2018 Nov; 126(5):432-438. PubMed ID: 30126809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Efficacy of Metal Artifact Reduction Algorithm of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography for Detection of Fenestration and Dehiscence around Dental Implants.
    Salemi F; Jamalpour MR; Eskandarloo A; Tapak L; Rahimi N
    J Biomed Phys Eng; 2021 Jun; 11(3):305-314. PubMed ID: 34189119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cone beam computed tomography artefacts around dental implants with different materials influencing the detection of peri-implant bone defects.
    Schriber M; Yeung AWK; Suter VGA; Buser D; Leung YY; Bornstein MM
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2020 Jul; 31(7):595-606. PubMed ID: 32147872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative analysis of the accuracy of periapical radiography and cone-beam computed tomography for diagnosing complex endodontic pathoses using a gold standard reference - A prospective clinical study.
    G K; Singh N; Yadav R; Duhan J; Tewari S; Gupta A; Sangwan P; Mittal S
    Int Endod J; 2021 Sep; 54(9):1448-1461. PubMed ID: 33904603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of Cone Beam Computed Tomography, Photostimulable Phosphor Plate Digital Radiography and Conventional Radiography for Detection of Artificial Cancellous Bone Defects.
    Bardal R; Jahanihashemi H; Mostafavi M; Kalhor E; Tofangchiha M; Dehghani M
    J Dent (Tehran); 2015 Nov; 12(11):797-806. PubMed ID: 27507990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography is limited at implant sites with a thin buccal bone: A laboratory study.
    Domic D; Bertl K; Ahmad S; Schropp L; Hellén-Halme K; Stavropoulos A
    J Periodontol; 2021 Apr; 92(4):592-601. PubMed ID: 32846005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Detection of peri-implant bone defects using cone-beam computed tomography and digital periapical radiography with parallel and oblique projection.
    Vadiati Saberi B; Khosravifard N; Ghandari F; Hadinezhad A
    Imaging Sci Dent; 2019 Dec; 49(4):265-272. PubMed ID: 31915611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficacy of cone-beam computed tomography with modified gray-scale range versus digital periapical radiography for the assessment of bone-implant interface gaps.
    Kajan ZD; Abbasi S; Khosravifard N; Sigaroudi AK; Motevasseli S
    Oral Radiol; 2022 Jan; 38(1):80-88. PubMed ID: 33893899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of Intra-Oral Radiography and Cone Beam Computed Tomography in the Diagnosis of Buccal Bone Loss.
    Christiaens V; Pauwels R; Mowafey B; Jacobs R
    J Imaging; 2023 Aug; 9(8):. PubMed ID: 37623696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of buccal marginal alveolar peri-implant and periodontal defects using a cone beam CT system with and without the application of metal artefact reduction mode.
    Kamburoglu K; Kolsuz E; Murat S; Eren H; Yüksel S; Paksoy CS
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(8):20130176. PubMed ID: 23956236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vitro diagnostic accuracy of low-dose CBCT for evaluation of peri-implant bone lesions.
    Schwindling FS; Hilgenfeld T; Weber D; Kosinski MA; Rammelsberg P; Tasaka A
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2019 Dec; 30(12):1200-1208. PubMed ID: 31505065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of peri-implant bone evaluation using cone beam CT, digital intra-oral radiographs and histology.
    Ritter L; Elger MC; Rothamel D; Fienitz T; Zinser M; Schwarz F; Zöller JE
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2014; 43(6):20130088. PubMed ID: 24786136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of kilovoltage-peak and the metal artifact reduction tool in cone-beam computed tomography on the detection of bone defects around titanium-zirconia and zirconia implants.
    Fontenele RC; Nascimento EHL; Imbelloni-Vasconcelos AC; Martins LAC; Pontual ADA; Ramos-Perez FMM; Freitas DQ
    Imaging Sci Dent; 2022 Sep; 52(3):267-273. PubMed ID: 36238703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The efficacy of metal artifact reduction (MAR) algorithm in cone-beam computed tomography on the diagnostic accuracy of fenestration and dehiscence around dental implants.
    Sheikhi M; Behfarnia P; Mostajabi M; Nasri N
    J Periodontol; 2020 Feb; 91(2):209-214. PubMed ID: 31364765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of the accuracy of buccal bone thickness measurement from cone beam computed tomography compared with histologic analysis.
    Tanaka Y; Dutra V; Lin WS; Levon J; Hamada Y
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jul; 130(1):68-73. PubMed ID: 34756426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Factors affecting the possibility to detect buccal bone condition around dental implants using cone beam computed tomography.
    Liedke GS; Spin-Neto R; da Silveira HED; Schropp L; Stavropoulos A; Wenzel A
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Sep; 28(9):1082-1088. PubMed ID: 27444713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.