These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37810541)

  • 1. Using Item Scores and Distractors to Detect Test Speededness.
    Gorney K; Wollack JA; Bolt DM
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2023 Sep; 47(5-6):386-401. PubMed ID: 37810541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detection of Test Speededness Using Change-Point Analysis.
    Shao C; Li J; Cheng Y
    Psychometrika; 2016 Dec; 81(4):1118-1141. PubMed ID: 26305400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Comprehensive Review and Comparison of CUSUM and Change-Point-Analysis Methods to Detect Test Speededness.
    Yu X; Cheng Y
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2022; 57(1):112-133. PubMed ID: 32877253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Application of Change Point Analysis of Response Time Data to Detect Test Speededness.
    Cheng Y; Shao C
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2022 Oct; 82(5):1031-1062. PubMed ID: 35989725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using a Response Time-Based Expected A Posteriori Estimator to Control for Differential Speededness in Computerized Adaptive Test.
    Kern JL; Choe E
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2021 Jul; 45(5):361-385. PubMed ID: 34565941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clarifying the Effect of Test Speededness.
    Hong MR; Cheng Y
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 Nov; 43(8):611-623. PubMed ID: 31551639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating the Accuracy of the Empirical Item Characteristic Curve Preequating Method in the Presence of Test Speededness.
    Qiu Y; Huggins-Manley AC
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2019 Apr; 79(2):288-309. PubMed ID: 30911194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Utilizing response times in cognitive diagnostic computerized adaptive testing under the higher-order deterministic input, noisy 'and' gate model.
    Huang HY
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2020 Feb; 73(1):109-141. PubMed ID: 30793768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relations of the Number of Functioning Distractors With the Item Difficulty Index and the Item Discrimination Power in the Multiple Choice Questions.
    Chauhan GR; Chauhan BR; Vaza JV; Chauhan PR
    Cureus; 2023 Jul; 15(7):e42492. PubMed ID: 37644928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The optimal number of options for multiple-choice questions on high-stakes tests: application of a revised index for detecting nonfunctional distractors.
    Raymond MR; Stevens C; Bucak SD
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2019 Mar; 24(1):141-150. PubMed ID: 30362027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A new perspective on detecting performance decline: A change-point analysis based on Jensen-Shannon divergence.
    Tu D; Li Y; Cai Y
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Apr; 55(3):963-980. PubMed ID: 35524039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using Automatic Item Generation to Improve the Quality of MCQ Distractors.
    Lai H; Gierl MJ; Touchie C; Pugh D; Boulais AP; De Champlain A
    Teach Learn Med; 2016; 28(2):166-73. PubMed ID: 26849247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A speeded item response model: leave the harder till later.
    Chang YW; Tsai RC; Hsu NJ
    Psychometrika; 2014 Apr; 79(2):255-74. PubMed ID: 24659371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On the Speed Sensitivity Parameter in the Lognormal Model for Response Times and Implications for High-Stakes Measurement Practice.
    Becker B; Debeer D; Weirich S; Goldhammer F
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2021 Sep; 45(6):407-422. PubMed ID: 34565944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rasch analysis of distractors in multiple-choice items.
    Wang WC
    J Outcome Meas; 1998; 2(1):43-65. PubMed ID: 9661731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How Speededness of a Reasoning Test and the Complexity of Mental Speed Tasks Influence the Relation between Mental Speed and Reasoning Ability.
    Borter N; Schlegel K; Troche SJ
    J Intell; 2023 May; 11(5):. PubMed ID: 37233338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modeling Item Revisit Behavior: The Hierarchical Speed-Accuracy-Revisits Model.
    Bezirhan U; von Davier M; Grabovsky I
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2021 Apr; 81(2):363-387. PubMed ID: 37929265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparing the Performance of Eight Item Preknowledge Detection Statistics.
    Belov DI
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2016 Mar; 40(2):83-97. PubMed ID: 29881040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Compromised item detection: A Bayesian change-point perspective.
    Du Y; Zhang S; Chang HH
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2023 Feb; 76(1):131-153. PubMed ID: 36069306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How Much
    Forthmann B; Förster N; Schütze B; Hebbecker K; Flessner J; Peters MT; Souvignier E
    J Intell; 2020 Mar; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 32182841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.