These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37810543)

  • 21. Nonparametric CD-CAT for multiple-choice items: Item selection method and Q-optimality.
    Wang Y; Chiu CY; Köhn HF
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38794963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Sample Size Requirements for Estimation of Item Parameters in the Multidimensional Graded Response Model.
    Jiang S; Wang C; Weiss DJ
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():109. PubMed ID: 26903916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. An Optimized Bayesian Hierarchical Two-Parameter Logistic Model for Small-Sample Item Calibration.
    König C; Spoden C; Frey A
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2020 Jun; 44(4):311-326. PubMed ID: 32536732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Categorical Omega With Small Sample Sizes via Bayesian Estimation: An Alternative to Frequentist Estimators.
    Yang Y; Xia Y
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2019 Feb; 79(1):19-39. PubMed ID: 30636780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A Bayesian Random Block Item Response Theory Model for Forced-Choice Formats.
    Lee H; Smith WZ
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2020 Jun; 80(3):578-603. PubMed ID: 32425220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparing Traditional and IRT Scoring of Forced-Choice Tests.
    Hontangas PM; de la Torre J; Ponsoda V; Leenen I; Morillo D; Abad FJ
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2015 Nov; 39(8):598-612. PubMed ID: 29881030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Methods for online calibration of Q-matrix and item parameters for polytomous responses in cognitive diagnostic computerized adaptive testing.
    Tan Q; Wang D; Luo F; Cai Y; Tu D
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38689154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Bayesian Estimation for Item Factor Analysis Models with Sparse Categorical Indicators.
    Bainter SA
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2017; 52(5):593-615. PubMed ID: 28715231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A Psychometric Model for Discrete-Option Multiple-Choice Items.
    Bolt DM; Kim N; Wollack J; Pan Y; Eckerly C; Sowles J
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2020 Jan; 44(1):33-48. PubMed ID: 31853157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Rasch Model Parameter Estimation in the Presence of a Nonnormal Latent Trait Using a Nonparametric Bayesian Approach.
    Finch H; Edwards JM
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2016 Aug; 76(4):662-684. PubMed ID: 29795882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of two Bayesian methods to detect mode effects between paper-based and computerized adaptive assessments: a preliminary Monte Carlo study.
    Riley BB; Carle AC
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2012 Aug; 12():124. PubMed ID: 22900979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. An iterative two-step method for online item calibration in CD-CAT.
    Yu X; Cheng Y
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Jan; 56(1):233-257. PubMed ID: 36581783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Polytomous multilevel testlet models for testlet-based assessments with complex sampling designs.
    Jiao H; Zhang Y
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2015 Feb; 68(1):65-83. PubMed ID: 24571376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Online Calibration of Polytomous Items Under the Graded Response Model.
    Xiong J; Ding S; Luo F; Luo Z
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():3085. PubMed ID: 32038427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Scoring Single-Response Multiple-Choice Items: Scoping Review and Comparison of Different Scoring Methods.
    Kanzow AF; Schmidt D; Kanzow P
    JMIR Med Educ; 2023 May; 9():e44084. PubMed ID: 37001510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Sample Size Requirements for Applying Mixed Polytomous Item Response Models: Results of a Monte Carlo Simulation Study.
    Kutscher T; Eid M; Crayen C
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():2494. PubMed ID: 31798490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A Bayesian Robust IRT Outlier-Detection Model.
    Öztürk NK; Karabatsos G
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2017 May; 41(3):195-208. PubMed ID: 29881088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Diagnostic Classification Model for Forced-Choice Items and Noncognitive Tests.
    Huang HY
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2023 Feb; 83(1):146-180. PubMed ID: 36601255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Using Deterministic, Gated Item Response Theory Model to detect test cheating due to item compromise.
    Shu Z; Henson R; Luecht R
    Psychometrika; 2013 Jul; 78(3):481-97. PubMed ID: 25106396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Investigating the Impact of Item Parameter Drift for Item Response Theory Models with Mixture Distributions.
    Park YS; Lee YS; Xing K
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():255. PubMed ID: 26941699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.