154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37810978)
1. Development, quality, and influencing factors of colonoscopy in China: results from the national census in 2013 and 2020.
Jiao YF; Cheng ZY; Gao Y; Yu CT; Jiang HS; Wang TL; Deng Y; Lin H; Wang TJ; Wang W; Wan R; Li ZS; Xin L; Wang LW
Front Oncol; 2023; 13():1276520. PubMed ID: 37810978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Development and status quo of digestive endoscopy in China: An analysis based on the national census in 2013 and 2020.
Jiao Y; Cheng Z; Gao Y; Wang T; Xin L; Lin H; Cai M; Ma X; Li Z; Wang L
J Transl Int Med; 2024 Apr; 12(2):177-187. PubMed ID: 38779123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Impact of Sedation on Adenoma Detection Rate and Cecal Intubation Rate in Colonoscopy.
Zhang Q; Dong Z; Jiang Y; Zhan T; Wang J; Xu S
Gastroenterol Res Pract; 2020; 2020():3089094. PubMed ID: 33381166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quality of endoscopic screening for colorectal cancer in Italy: A national survey.
Maida M; Annibale B; Benedetti A; Burra P; Frulloni L; Ianiro G; Luzza F; Repici A; Savarino E; Sinagra E; Vecchi M; Ricciardiello L;
Dig Liver Dis; 2022 Oct; 54(10):1410-1418. PubMed ID: 35753948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ileal intubation is not associated with higher detection rate of right-sided conventional adenomas and serrated polyps compared to cecal intubation after adjustment for overall adenoma detection rate.
Buerger M; Kasper P; Allo G; Gillessen J; Schramm C
BMC Gastroenterol; 2019 Nov; 19(1):190. PubMed ID: 31730463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Utilization and quality assessment of digestive endoscopy in China: results from 5-year consecutive nationwide surveys.
Xin L; Gao Y; Cheng Z; Wang T; Lin H; Pang Y; Sun C; Fu Z; Li Z; Ma X; Wang L
Chin Med J (Engl); 2022 Aug; 135(16):2003-2010. PubMed ID: 36070457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quality of colonoscopy in an organised colorectal cancer screening programme with immunochemical faecal occult blood test: the EQuIPE study (Evaluating Quality Indicators of the Performance of Endoscopy).
Zorzi M; Senore C; Da Re F; Barca A; Bonelli LA; Cannizzaro R; Fasoli R; Di Furia L; Di Giulio E; Mantellini P; Naldoni C; Sassatelli R; Rex D; Hassan C; Zappa M;
Gut; 2015 Sep; 64(9):1389-96. PubMed ID: 25227521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quality indicators for screening colonoscopy and colonoscopist performance and the subsequent risk of interval colorectal cancer: a systematic review.
Lund M; Trads M; Njor SH; Erichsen R; Andersen B
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2019 Nov; 17(11):2265-2300. PubMed ID: 31188154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An Evaluation of Critical Factors for the Cost-Effectiveness of Real-Time Computer-Aided Detection: Sensitivity and Threshold Analyses Using a Microsimulation Model.
Thiruvengadam NR; Coté GA; Gupta S; Rodrigues M; Schneider Y; Arain MA; Solaimani P; Serrao S; Kochman ML; Saumoy M
Gastroenterology; 2023 May; 164(6):906-920. PubMed ID: 36736437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Correlation between adenoma detection rate and other quality indicators, and its variability depending on factors such as sedation or indication for colonoscopy.
Groza AL; Ungureanu BS; Tefas C; Miuțescu B; Tanțău M
Front Pharmacol; 2022; 13():1041915. PubMed ID: 36601057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative Efficacy of Colonoscope Distal Attachment Devices in Increasing Rates of Adenoma Detection: A Network Meta-analysis.
Facciorusso A; Del Prete V; Buccino RV; Della Valle N; Nacchiero MC; Monica F; Cannizzaro R; Muscatiello N
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018 Aug; 16(8):1209-1219.e9. PubMed ID: 29133257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Trends in quality of screening colonoscopy in Austria.
Waldmann E; Gessl I; Sallinger D; Jeschek P; Britto-Arias M; Heinze G; Fasching E; Weiss W; Gschwantler M; Trauner M; Ferlitsch M
Endoscopy; 2016 Dec; 48(12):1102-1109. PubMed ID: 27576182
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Incidence of interval colorectal cancer attributable to an endoscopist in clinical practice.
Ertem FU; Ladabaum U; Mehrotra A; Tehranian S; Shi Z; Saul M; Morris M; Crockett SD; Schoen RE
Gastrointest Endosc; 2018 Oct; 88(4):705-711.e1. PubMed ID: 29803767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Association of Adenoma Detection Rate and Adenoma Characteristics With Colorectal Cancer Mortality After Screening Colonoscopy.
Waldmann E; Kammerlander AA; Gessl I; Penz D; Majcher B; Hinterberger A; Bretthauer M; Trauner MH; Ferlitsch M
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2021 Sep; 19(9):1890-1898. PubMed ID: 33878471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of cecal intubation and adenoma detection between hospitals can provide incentives to improve quality of colonoscopy.
Belderbos TD; Grobbee EJ; van Oijen MG; Meijssen MA; Ouwendijk RJ; Tang TJ; ter Borg F; van der Schaar P; Le Fèvre DM; Stouten MT; van der Galiën O; Hiemstra TJ; de Vos tot Nederveen Cappel WH; ter Borg PC; Spaander MC; Moons LM; Kuipers EJ; Siersema PD
Endoscopy; 2015 Aug; 47(8):703-9. PubMed ID: 26090725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Latest Generation High-Definition Colonoscopy Increases Adenoma Detection Rate by Trainee Endoscopists.
Lee JY; Koh M; Lee JH
Dig Dis Sci; 2021 Aug; 66(8):2756-2762. PubMed ID: 32808142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Increased Rate of Adenoma Detection Associates With Reduced Risk of Colorectal Cancer and Death.
Kaminski MF; Wieszczy P; Rupinski M; Wojciechowska U; Didkowska J; Kraszewska E; Kobiela J; Franczyk R; Rupinska M; Kocot B; Chaber-Ciopinska A; Pachlewski J; Polkowski M; Regula J
Gastroenterology; 2017 Jul; 153(1):98-105. PubMed ID: 28428142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Adenoma Detection Rate and Risk for Interval Postcolonoscopy Colorectal Cancer in Fecal Immunochemical Test-Based Screening : A Population-Based Cohort Study.
Wisse PHA; Erler NS; de Boer SY; den Hartog B; Oudkerk Pool M; Terhaar Sive Droste JS; Verveer C; Meijer GA; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Kuipers EJ; Dekker E; Spaander MCW
Ann Intern Med; 2022 Oct; 175(10):1366-1373. PubMed ID: 36162114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Secondary Quality Indicator to Improve Prediction of Adenoma Miss Rate Apart from Adenoma Detection Rate.
Aniwan S; Orkoonsawat P; Viriyautsahakul V; Angsuwatcharakon P; Pittayanon R; Wisedopas N; Sumdin S; Ponuthai Y; Wiangngoen S; Kullavanijaya P; Rerknimitr R
Am J Gastroenterol; 2016 May; 111(5):723-9. PubMed ID: 26809333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. EUS development in China: Results from national surveys in 2013 and 2020.
Xin L; Gao Y; Wang TJ; Meng QQ; Jin ZD; Fu ZJ; Wang YL; Lin H; Li ZS; Wang LW
Endosc Ultrasound; 2023; 12(1):90-95. PubMed ID: 36861507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
