155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37811507)
1. Midterm Outcomes of Muscle-Preserving Posterior Lumbar Decompression via Sagittal Splitting of the Spinous Process: Minimum 5-Year Follow-up.
Son HJ; Chang BS; Chang SY; Gimm G; Kim H
Clin Orthop Surg; 2023 Oct; 15(5):800-808. PubMed ID: 37811507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mid-term changes in spinopelvic sagittal alignment in lumbar spinal stenosis with coexisting degenerative spondylolisthesis or scoliosis after minimally invasive lumbar decompression surgery: minimum five-year follow-up.
Salimi H; Toyoda H; Terai H; Yamada K; Hoshino M; Suzuki A; Takahashi S; Tamai K; Hori Y; Yabu A; Nakamura H
Spine J; 2022 May; 22(5):819-826. PubMed ID: 34813957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Short Lumbosacral Decompression Plus Fixation Does Not Change the Spinopelvic Balance on Patients With Moderate Degenerative Spondylolisthesis and Associated Spinal Stenosis.
Korovessis P; Syrimpeis V; Tsekouras V
Spine Deform; 2019 Mar; 7(2):346-355. PubMed ID: 30660232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Restoration of the Spinous Process Following Muscle-Preserving Posterior Lumbar Decompression via Sagittal Splitting of the Spinous Process.
Wi SM; Lee HJ; Chang SY; Kwon OH; Lee CK; Chang BS; Kim H
Clin Orthop Surg; 2019 Mar; 11(1):95-102. PubMed ID: 30838113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Efficacy of Spinous Process Splitting Decompression Compared with Conventional Laminectomy for Degenerative Lumbar Stenosis.
Ovalioglu TC; Ozdemir Ovalioglu A; Canaz G; Gunes M; Babur M; Emel E
World Neurosurg; 2022 Aug; 164():e1233-e1242. PubMed ID: 35691518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Should patients with lumbar stenosis and grade I spondylolisthesis be treated differently based on spinopelvic alignment? A retrospective, two-year, propensity matched, comparison of patient-reported outcome measures and clinical outcomes from multiple sites within a single health system.
Mohanty S; Barchick S; Kadiyala M; Lad M; Rouhi AD; Vadali C; Albayar A; Ozturk AK; Khalsa A; Saifi C; Casper DS
Spine J; 2023 Jan; 23(1):92-104. PubMed ID: 36064091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The sagittal spinal profile type: a principal precondition for surgical decision making in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
Bayerl SH; Pöhlmann F; Finger T; Franke J; Woitzik J; Vajkoczy P
J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Nov; 27(5):552-559. PubMed ID: 28862573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effectiveness of posterior decompression techniques compared with conventional laminectomy for lumbar stenosis.
Overdevest GM; Jacobs W; Vleggeert-Lankamp C; Thomé C; Gunzburg R; Peul W
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Mar; (3):CD010036. PubMed ID: 25760812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Decompression and paraspinous tension band: a novel treatment method for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis.
Gibson JNA; Depreitere B; Pflugmacher R; Schnake KJ; Fielding LC; Alamin TF; Goffin J
Spine J; 2015 Mar; 15(3 Suppl):S23-S32. PubMed ID: 25579423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical outcome of microscopic lumbar spinous process-splitting laminectomy: clinical article.
Nomura H; Yanagisawa Y; Arima J; Oga M
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Aug; 21(2):187-94. PubMed ID: 24878270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Factors associated with improvement in sagittal spinal alignment after microendoscopic laminotomy in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis.
Dohzono S; Toyoda H; Takahashi S; Matsumoto T; Suzuki A; Terai H; Nakamura H
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Jul; 25(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 26967988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Decompression by 30° Arthroscopy in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Minimum 2-Year Follow-up.
Kim JE; Choi DJ
Clin Orthop Surg; 2018 Sep; 10(3):328-336. PubMed ID: 30174809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Rigid, semirigid versus dynamic instrumentation for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a correlative radiological and clinical analysis of short-term results.
Korovessis P; Papazisis Z; Koureas G; Lambiris E
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Apr; 29(7):735-42. PubMed ID: 15087795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Surgical outcomes of modified lumbar spinous process-splitting laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis.
Kanbara S; Yukawa Y; Ito K; Machino M; Kato F
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Apr; 22(4):353-7. PubMed ID: 25594729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Lumbar degenerative disease after oblique lateral interbody fusion: sagittal spinopelvic alignment and its impact on low back pain.
Li J; Zhang D; Shen Y; Qi X
J Orthop Surg Res; 2020 Aug; 15(1):326. PubMed ID: 32795374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of sagittal spinopelvic alignment on clinical outcomes after decompression surgery for lumbar spinal canal stenosis without coronal imbalance.
Hikata T; Watanabe K; Fujita N; Iwanami A; Hosogane N; Ishii K; Nakamura M; Toyama Y; Matsumoto M
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Oct; 23(4):451-8. PubMed ID: 26140404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical Outcomes and Radiologic Changes After Microsurgical Bilateral Decompression by a Unilateral Approach in Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Grade I Degenerative Spondylolisthesis With a Minimum 3-Year Follow-Up.
Jang JW; Park JH; Hyun SJ; Rhim SC
Clin Spine Surg; 2016 Aug; 29(7):268-71. PubMed ID: 23073148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Long-term durability of minimal invasive posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a clinical and radiographic follow-up.
Rouben D; Casnellie M; Ferguson M
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Jul; 24(5):288-96. PubMed ID: 20975594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Lumbar Spinous Process-Splitting Laminoplasty: A Novel Technique for Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression.
Baghdadi YM; Moussallem CD; Shuaib MA; Clarke MJ; Dekutoski MB; Nassr AN
Orthopedics; 2016 Sep; 39(5):e950-6. PubMed ID: 27337665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Preliminary results of anterior lumbar interbody fusion, anterior column realignment for the treatment of sagittal malalignment.
Hosseini P; Mundis GM; Eastlack RK; Bagheri R; Vargas E; Tran S; Akbarnia BA
Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Dec; 43(6):E6. PubMed ID: 29191100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
