These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
44. Vulnerability in research ethics: a way forward. Lange MM; Rogers W; Dodds S Bioethics; 2013 Jul; 27(6):333-40. PubMed ID: 23718774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. One thing leads to another: the cascade of obligations when researchers report genetic research results to study participants. Miller FA; Hayeems RZ; Li L; Bytautas JP Eur J Hum Genet; 2012 Aug; 20(8):837-43. PubMed ID: 22333903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. The views of ethics committee members and medical researchers on the return of individual research results and incidental findings, ownership issues and benefit sharing in biobanking research in a South Indian city. Vaz M; Vaz M; K S Dev World Bioeth; 2018 Dec; 18(4):321-330. PubMed ID: 28513968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. The duty to rescue in genomic research. Ulrich M Am J Bioeth; 2013; 13(2):50-1. PubMed ID: 23391064 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. COVID-19: an ethical predicament and the dichotomy of society. Talwar HS; Narain TA Postgrad Med J; 2021 Jun; 97(1148):343-344. PubMed ID: 33452153 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. The kindness of strangers: the donative contract between subjects and researchers and the non-obligation to return individual results of genetic research. Meyer MN Am J Bioeth; 2008 Nov; 8(11):44-6. PubMed ID: 19061109 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. What are our moral duties? Critical reflections on clinical equipoise and publication ethics, clinical choices, and moral theory. Cherry MJ J Med Philos; 2013 Dec; 38(6):581-9. PubMed ID: 24225388 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Authorship Ethics in the Era of Team Science. Hammer MJ; Miaskowski C Oncol Nurs Forum; 2017 Nov; 44(6):655-657. PubMed ID: 29052665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Why genomics researchers are sometimes morally required to hunt for secondary findings. Koplin JJ; Savulescu J; Vears DF BMC Med Ethics; 2020 Jan; 21(1):11. PubMed ID: 32005225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Eating meat and not vaccinating: In defense of the analogy. Jones B Bioethics; 2021 Feb; 35(2):135-142. PubMed ID: 33222212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Supererogation in clinical research. Barnbaum DR Med Health Care Philos; 2008 Sep; 11(3):343-9. PubMed ID: 18293099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. The Nirvana fallacy and the return of results. Biesecker LG Am J Bioeth; 2013; 13(2):43-4. PubMed ID: 23391060 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. The ethics of open methods. Homan R Br J Sociol; 1992 Sep; 43(3):321-32. PubMed ID: 11660181 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Scientists' Ethical Obligations and Social Responsibility for Nanotechnology Research. Corley EA; Kim Y; Scheufele DA Sci Eng Ethics; 2016 Feb; 22(1):111-32. PubMed ID: 25721444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Conflating scientific with clinical considerations. van der Graaf R; van Delden JJ Am J Bioeth; 2009 Sep; 9(9):58-9. PubMed ID: 19998198 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Reframing the ethical debate regarding incidental findings in genetic research. Garrett JR Am J Bioeth; 2013; 13(2):44-6. PubMed ID: 23391061 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Ethics, public health and technology responses to COVID-19. Miller S; Smith M Bioethics; 2021 May; 35(4):366-371. PubMed ID: 33594709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]