These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3781239)

  • 1. Two-disease locus model: sib pair method using information on both HLA and Gm.
    Dizier MH; Clerget-Darpoux F
    Genet Epidemiol; 1986; 3(5):343-56. PubMed ID: 3781239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Power of the affected-sib-pair method to defect disease susceptibility loci of small effect: an application to multiple sclerosis.
    Suarez B; O'Rourke D; Van Eerdewegh P
    Am J Med Genet; 1982 Jul; 12(3):309-26. PubMed ID: 6956238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. No evidence for linkage between an insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus-susceptibility locus and immunoglobulin loci KM or GM.
    Field LL; Goldstein A; Spence MA; Anderson CE; Rimoin DL
    Genet Epidemiol; 1984; 1(4):375-82. PubMed ID: 6599405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [The affected sib-set method: revision based on the mixed model using a conditional probability approach].
    Sergeev AS
    Genetika; 1991 Nov; 27(11):2020-33. PubMed ID: 1802788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Segregation analysis of two genetic markers in IDDM families under two-locus models.
    Dizier MH; Clerget-Darpoux F; Hochez J
    Genet Epidemiol; 1989; 6(1):71-5. PubMed ID: 2567261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Likelihood-based inference for the genetic relative risk based on affected-sibling-pair marker data.
    McKnight B; Tierney C; McGorray SP; Day NE
    Biometrics; 1998 Jun; 54(2):426-43. PubMed ID: 9629637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effects of reduced fertility, method of ascertainment, and a second unlinked locus on affected sib-pair marker allele sharing.
    Risch N
    Am J Med Genet; 1983 Oct; 16(2):243-59. PubMed ID: 6580817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Interaction between HLA and Gm for susceptibility to insulin-dependent diabetes].
    Dizier MH; Deschamps I; Hors J; Blanc M; Rivat-Peran L; Feingold N; Clerget-Darpoux F
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1985; 33(4-5):337-40. PubMed ID: 3867988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Optimal weighting scheme for affected sib-pair analysis of sibship data.
    Sham PC; Zhao JH; Curtis D
    Ann Hum Genet; 1997 Jan; 61(Pt 1):61-9. PubMed ID: 9066928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The distributions of N and F: measures of HLA haplotype concordance.
    Green J; Low HC
    Biometrics; 1984 Jun; 40(2):341-8. PubMed ID: 6487722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of sib-pair linkage tests for disease susceptibility loci.
    Blackwelder WC; Elston RC
    Genet Epidemiol; 1985; 2(1):85-97. PubMed ID: 3863778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Affected sib pair identity by state analyses.
    Thomson G; Motro U
    Genet Epidemiol; 1994; 11(4):353-64. PubMed ID: 7813897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Testing linkage and gene x environment interaction: comparison of different affected sib-pair methods.
    Dizier MH; Selinger-Leneman H; Genin E
    Genet Epidemiol; 2003 Jul; 25(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 12813728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A linkage analysis of the Gm locus and multiple sclerosis.
    Haile RW; Goldstein A; Field L; Marazita ML
    Genet Epidemiol; 1985; 2(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 3876966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interactive effect of Gm allotypes and HLA-B locus antigens on the human antibody response to a bacterial antigen.
    Whittingham S; Mathews JD; Schanfield MS; Matthews JV; Tait BD; Morris PJ; Mackay IR
    Clin Exp Immunol; 1980 Apr; 40(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 6930337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Correcting for ascertainment bias of relative-risk estimates obtained using affected-sib-pair linkage data.
    Cordell HJ; Olson JM
    Genet Epidemiol; 2000 Apr; 18(4):307-21. PubMed ID: 10797591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hidden linkage: a comparison of the affected sib pair (ASP) test and transmission/disequilibrium test (TDT).
    McGinnis RE
    Ann Hum Genet; 1998 Mar; 62(Pt 2):159-79. PubMed ID: 9759477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The affected sib method. V. Testing the assumptions.
    Louis EJ; Payami H; Thomson G
    Ann Hum Genet; 1987 Jan; 51(1):75-92. PubMed ID: 3314668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Conditional multipoint linkage analysis using affected sib pairs: an alternative approach.
    Chiu YF; Liang KY
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 Feb; 26(2):108-15. PubMed ID: 14748010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of three affected-sib-pair scoring methods to detect HLA-linked disease susceptibility genes.
    Suarez BK; Van Eerdewegh P
    Am J Med Genet; 1984 May; 18(1):135-46. PubMed ID: 6430084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.