BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3781239)

  • 1. Two-disease locus model: sib pair method using information on both HLA and Gm.
    Dizier MH; Clerget-Darpoux F
    Genet Epidemiol; 1986; 3(5):343-56. PubMed ID: 3781239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Power of the affected-sib-pair method to defect disease susceptibility loci of small effect: an application to multiple sclerosis.
    Suarez B; O'Rourke D; Van Eerdewegh P
    Am J Med Genet; 1982 Jul; 12(3):309-26. PubMed ID: 6956238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. No evidence for linkage between an insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus-susceptibility locus and immunoglobulin loci KM or GM.
    Field LL; Goldstein A; Spence MA; Anderson CE; Rimoin DL
    Genet Epidemiol; 1984; 1(4):375-82. PubMed ID: 6599405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [The affected sib-set method: revision based on the mixed model using a conditional probability approach].
    Sergeev AS
    Genetika; 1991 Nov; 27(11):2020-33. PubMed ID: 1802788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Segregation analysis of two genetic markers in IDDM families under two-locus models.
    Dizier MH; Clerget-Darpoux F; Hochez J
    Genet Epidemiol; 1989; 6(1):71-5. PubMed ID: 2567261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Likelihood-based inference for the genetic relative risk based on affected-sibling-pair marker data.
    McKnight B; Tierney C; McGorray SP; Day NE
    Biometrics; 1998 Jun; 54(2):426-43. PubMed ID: 9629637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effects of reduced fertility, method of ascertainment, and a second unlinked locus on affected sib-pair marker allele sharing.
    Risch N
    Am J Med Genet; 1983 Oct; 16(2):243-59. PubMed ID: 6580817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Interaction between HLA and Gm for susceptibility to insulin-dependent diabetes].
    Dizier MH; Deschamps I; Hors J; Blanc M; Rivat-Peran L; Feingold N; Clerget-Darpoux F
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1985; 33(4-5):337-40. PubMed ID: 3867988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Optimal weighting scheme for affected sib-pair analysis of sibship data.
    Sham PC; Zhao JH; Curtis D
    Ann Hum Genet; 1997 Jan; 61(Pt 1):61-9. PubMed ID: 9066928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The distributions of N and F: measures of HLA haplotype concordance.
    Green J; Low HC
    Biometrics; 1984 Jun; 40(2):341-8. PubMed ID: 6487722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of sib-pair linkage tests for disease susceptibility loci.
    Blackwelder WC; Elston RC
    Genet Epidemiol; 1985; 2(1):85-97. PubMed ID: 3863778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Affected sib pair identity by state analyses.
    Thomson G; Motro U
    Genet Epidemiol; 1994; 11(4):353-64. PubMed ID: 7813897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Testing linkage and gene x environment interaction: comparison of different affected sib-pair methods.
    Dizier MH; Selinger-Leneman H; Genin E
    Genet Epidemiol; 2003 Jul; 25(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 12813728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A linkage analysis of the Gm locus and multiple sclerosis.
    Haile RW; Goldstein A; Field L; Marazita ML
    Genet Epidemiol; 1985; 2(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 3876966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interactive effect of Gm allotypes and HLA-B locus antigens on the human antibody response to a bacterial antigen.
    Whittingham S; Mathews JD; Schanfield MS; Matthews JV; Tait BD; Morris PJ; Mackay IR
    Clin Exp Immunol; 1980 Apr; 40(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 6930337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Correcting for ascertainment bias of relative-risk estimates obtained using affected-sib-pair linkage data.
    Cordell HJ; Olson JM
    Genet Epidemiol; 2000 Apr; 18(4):307-21. PubMed ID: 10797591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hidden linkage: a comparison of the affected sib pair (ASP) test and transmission/disequilibrium test (TDT).
    McGinnis RE
    Ann Hum Genet; 1998 Mar; 62(Pt 2):159-79. PubMed ID: 9759477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The affected sib method. V. Testing the assumptions.
    Louis EJ; Payami H; Thomson G
    Ann Hum Genet; 1987 Jan; 51(1):75-92. PubMed ID: 3314668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Conditional multipoint linkage analysis using affected sib pairs: an alternative approach.
    Chiu YF; Liang KY
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 Feb; 26(2):108-15. PubMed ID: 14748010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of three affected-sib-pair scoring methods to detect HLA-linked disease susceptibility genes.
    Suarez BK; Van Eerdewegh P
    Am J Med Genet; 1984 May; 18(1):135-46. PubMed ID: 6430084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.