148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37812520)
1. Comparison of 68Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC and 18F-FDG PET/CT in the Evaluation of Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma-A Prospective Study.
Shamim SA; Kumar N; Arora G; Kumar D; Pathak A; Thakkar A; Sikka K; Singh CA; Kakkar A; Bhalla AS
Clin Nucl Med; 2023 Nov; 48(11):e509-e515. PubMed ID: 37812520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. PET/CT With 68Ga-PSMA and 18F-FDG in Metastatic Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma: Report of 2 Cases.
Isgoren S; Hekimsoy T; Koroglu E; Demir H
Clin Nucl Med; 2022 May; 47(5):e423-e424. PubMed ID: 35234196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4.
van Boxtel W; Lütje S; van Engen-van Grunsven ICH; Verhaegh GW; Schalken JA; Jonker MA; Nagarajah J; Gotthardt M; van Herpen CML
Theranostics; 2020; 10(5):2273-2283. PubMed ID: 32089741
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Expression in Patients With Differentiated Thyroid Cancer With Thyroglobulin Elevation and Negative Iodine Scintigraphy Using 68Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC PET/CT.
Verma P; Malhotra G; Meshram V; Chandak A; Sonavane S; Lila AR; Bandgar TR; Asopa RV
Clin Nucl Med; 2021 Aug; 46(8):e406-e409. PubMed ID: 33883490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. 68Ga-Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-Avid Malignant Pleural Effusion in a Patient With Metastatic Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma and Concordance With 18F-FDG PET/CT.
Uijen MJM; Weijers JAM; Driessen CML; van Herpen CML; Nagarajah J
Clin Nucl Med; 2022 Feb; 47(2):140-141. PubMed ID: 35006109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Head-to-head comparisons of enhanced CT, 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT in identifying adverse pathology of clear-cell renal cell carcinoma: a prospective study.
Chen SH; Lin BH; Chen SM; Qiu QR; Ruan ZT; Chen ZJ; Wei Y; Zheng QS; Xue XY; Miao WB; Xu N
Int Braz J Urol; 2023; 49(6):716-731. PubMed ID: 37624658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Multicenter Prospective Clinical Trial of
McCarthy M; Francis R; Tang C; Watts J; Campbell A
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2019 Jul; 104(4):801-808. PubMed ID: 30890448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Exploratory analysis of 64 CuCl 2 PET-CT imaging in carcinoma prostate and its comparison with 68 Ga-PSMA-11 and 18 F-FDG PET-CT.
Nazar AK; Kalshetty A; Chakravarty R; Chakraborty S; Basu S
Nucl Med Commun; 2023 Oct; 44(10):910-923. PubMed ID: 37578310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Imaging of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Expression in Metastatic Differentiated Thyroid Cancer Using 68Ga-HBED-CC-PSMA PET/CT.
Lütje S; Gomez B; Cohnen J; Umutlu L; Gotthardt M; Poeppel TD; Bockisch A; Rosenbaum-Krumme S
Clin Nucl Med; 2017 Jan; 42(1):20-25. PubMed ID: 27846003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. 68Ga-PSMA and 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT Findings With 18F-FDG PET/CT in a Patient With Recurrent Prostate Cancer.
Tatar G; Ergül N; Baloğlu MC; Arslan E; Çermik TF
Clin Nucl Med; 2023 Mar; 48(3):e135-e137. PubMed ID: 36723899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Potential role of
Aggarwal P; Singh H; Das CK; Mavuduru RS; Kakkar N; Lal A; Gorsi U; Kumar R; Mittal BR
Eur J Radiol; 2024 Jan; 170():111218. PubMed ID: 38007857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Histological Validation of FDG and PSMA-Targeted PET/CT Imaging in a Rare Tracheal Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma.
Sandach P; Seifert R; Slama A; Theegarten D; Hautzel H
Clin Nucl Med; 2023 Jan; 48(1):e16-e18. PubMed ID: 36469074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14.
von Eyben FE; Picchio M; von Eyben R; Rhee H; Bauman G
Eur Urol Focus; 2018 Sep; 4(5):686-693. PubMed ID: 28753806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evidence of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Expression in Metastatic Differentiated Thyroid Cancer Using 68Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC PET/CT.
Verma P; Malhotra G; Agrawal R; Sonavane S; Meshram V; Asopa RV
Clin Nucl Med; 2018 Aug; 43(8):e265-e268. PubMed ID: 29894335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16.
Parghane RV; Basu S
J Nucl Med Technol; 2023 Sep; 51(3):261-262. PubMed ID: 36041875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. How accurate is
Erdem S; Simsek DH; Degirmenci E; Aydin R; Bagbudar S; Ozluk Y; Sanli Y; Sanli O; Ozcan F
Urol Oncol; 2022 Jan; 40(1):6.e1-6.e9. PubMed ID: 34400066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Primary lymph-node staging with
Corona-Montes VE; González-Cuenca E; Fernández-Noyola G; Olarte-Casas MA; Bobadilla-Salazar D; Medrano-Urtecho HM; Asimakopoulos AD
Urol Oncol; 2021 Aug; 39(8):494.e1-494.e6. PubMed ID: 33223371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is 68Ga-Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen PET/CT Superior than 18F-FDG PET/CT for Evaluation of Metastatic Osteosarcoma?
Can C; Gündoğan C; Kömek H
Clin Nucl Med; 2021 Apr; 46(4):e233-e235. PubMed ID: 33031232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The roles of 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT and 18 F-FDG PET/CT imaging in patients with triple-negative breast cancer and the association of tissue PSMA and claudin 1, 4, and 7 levels with PET findings.
Arslan E; Ergül N; Beyhan E; Erol Fenercioglu Ö; Sahin R; Cin M; Battal Havare S; Can Trabulus FD; Mermut Ö; Akbas S; Fikret Çermik T
Nucl Med Commun; 2023 Apr; 44(4):284-290. PubMed ID: 36756767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
