These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37813110)

  • 21. Uterine fibroids: correlations between MRI appearance and stiffness via magnetic resonance elastography.
    Jondal DE; Wang J; Chen J; Gorny KR; Felmlee J; Hesly G; Laughlin-Tommaso S; Stewart EA; Ehman R; Woodrum DA
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2018 Jun; 43(6):1456-1463. PubMed ID: 28952003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Normal range for MR elastography measured liver stiffness in children without liver disease.
    Sawh MC; Newton KP; Goyal NP; Angeles JE; Harlow K; Bross C; Schlein AN; Hooker JC; Sy EZ; Glaser KJ; Yin M; Ehman RL; Sirlin CB; Schwimmer JB
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Mar; 51(3):919-927. PubMed ID: 31452280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Magnetic resonance elastography to quantify liver disease severity in autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease.
    Hartung EA; Calle-Toro JS; Lopera CM; Wen J; Carson RH; Dutt M; Howarth K; Furth SL; Darge K; Serai SD
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2021 Feb; 46(2):570-580. PubMed ID: 32757071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. MRI-guided biopsy to correlate tissue specimens with MR elastography stiffness readings in liver transplants.
    Perumpail RB; Levitsky J; Wang Y; Lee VS; Karp J; Jin N; Yang GY; Bolster BD; Shah S; Zuehlsdorff S; Nemcek AA; Larson AC; Miller FH; Omary RA
    Acad Radiol; 2012 Sep; 19(9):1121-6. PubMed ID: 22877987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Usefulness of MR elastography for predicting esophageal varices in cirrhotic patients.
    Sun HY; Lee JM; Han JK; Choi BI
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Mar; 39(3):559-66. PubMed ID: 24115368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Quantification of breast stiffness using MR elastography at 3 Tesla with a soft sternal driver: A reproducibility study.
    Hawley JR; Kalra P; Mo X; Raterman B; Yee LD; Kolipaka A
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 May; 45(5):1379-1384. PubMed ID: 27779802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of magnetic resonance elastography and diffusion-weighted imaging for differentiating benign and malignant liver lesions.
    Hennedige TP; Hallinan JT; Leung FP; Teo LL; Iyer S; Wang G; Chang S; Madhavan KK; Wee A; Venkatesh SK
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Feb; 26(2):398-406. PubMed ID: 26032879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Quantification of aortic stiffness using MR elastography and its comparison to MRI-based pulse wave velocity.
    Damughatla AR; Raterman B; Sharkey-Toppen T; Jin N; Simonetti OP; White RD; Kolipaka A
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Jan; 41(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 24243654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Magnetic resonance elastography of the supraspinatus muscle: A preliminary study on test-retest repeatability and wave quality with different frequencies and image filtering.
    Ito D; Numano T; Ueki T; Habe T; Maeno T; Takamoto K; Igarashi K; Maharjan S; Mizuhara K; Nishijo H
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Sep; 71():27-36. PubMed ID: 32325234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Noninvasive prediction of portal pressure with MR elastography and DCE-MRI of the liver and spleen: Preliminary results.
    Wagner M; Hectors S; Bane O; Gordic S; Kennedy P; Besa C; Schiano TD; Thung S; Fischman A; Taouli B
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Oct; 48(4):1091-1103. PubMed ID: 29638020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Simultaneous measurement of hepatic and splenic stiffness using MR elastography: preliminary experience.
    Dyvorne HA; Jajamovich GH; Besa C; Cooper N; Taouli B
    Abdom Imaging; 2015 Apr; 40(4):803-9. PubMed ID: 25294006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Sex Differences in Aging-related Myocardial Stiffening Quantitatively Measured with MR Elastography.
    Arani A; Murphy MC; Bhopalwala H; Arunachalam SP; Rossman PJ; Trzasko JD; Glaser K; Sui Y; Gunderson T; Arruda-Olson AM; Manduca A; Kantarci K; Ehman RL; Araoz PA
    Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging; 2024 Jun; 6(3):e230140. PubMed ID: 38780427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Prospective comparison of transient, point shear wave, and magnetic resonance elastography for staging liver fibrosis.
    Lefebvre T; Wartelle-Bladou C; Wong P; Sebastiani G; Giard JM; Castel H; Murphy-Lavallée J; Olivié D; Ilinca A; Sylvestre MP; Gilbert G; Gao ZH; Nguyen BN; Cloutier G; Tang A
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Dec; 29(12):6477-6488. PubMed ID: 31278577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Noninvasive liver fibrosis assessment in chronic viral hepatitis C: agreement among 1D transient elastography, 2D shear wave elastography, and magnetic resonance elastography.
    Matos J; Paparo F; Bacigalupo L; Cenderello G; Mussetto I; De Cesari M; Bernardi SP; Cevasco L; Forni GL; Cassola G; Rollandi GA
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Dec; 44(12):4011-4021. PubMed ID: 31696266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Abdominal MR elastography with multiple driver arrays: performance and repeatability.
    Chen J; Chen J; Heilman JA; Glaser KJ; Grimm RC; Owusu N; Qiu C; Ehman RL; Yin M
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2023 Jun; 48(6):1945-1954. PubMed ID: 36928333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Magnetic resonance elastography for estimating in vivo stiffness of the abdominal aorta using cardiac-gated spin-echo echo-planar imaging: a feasibility study.
    Dong H; Jin N; Kannengiesser S; Raterman B; White RD; Kolipaka A
    NMR Biomed; 2021 Jan; 34(1):e4420. PubMed ID: 33021342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. MR elastography outperforms shear wave elastography for the diagnosis of clinically significant portal hypertension.
    Kennedy P; Stocker D; Carbonell G; Said D; Bane O; Hectors S; Abboud G; Cuevas J; Bolster BD; Friedman SL; Lewis S; Schiano T; Bhattacharya D; Fischman A; Thung S; Taouli B
    Eur Radiol; 2022 Dec; 32(12):8339-8349. PubMed ID: 35727321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. MR elastography for noninvasive assessment of hepatic fibrosis: reproducibility of the examination and reproducibility and repeatability of the liver stiffness value measurement.
    Lee Yj; Lee JM; Lee JE; Lee KB; Lee ES; Yoon JH; Yu MH; Baek JH; Shin CI; Han JK; Choi BI
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Feb; 39(2):326-31. PubMed ID: 23589232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Normative Pancreatic Stiffness Levels and Related Influences Established by Magnetic Resonance Elastography in Volunteers.
    Xu Y; Cai X; Shi Y; Yin M; Lan G; Zhang X; Ji R; Chang Liu
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Aug; 52(2):448-458. PubMed ID: 31943515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Magnetic resonance elastography vs. point shear wave ultrasound elastography for the assessment of renal allograft dysfunction.
    Kennedy P; Bane O; Hectors SJ; Gordic S; Berger M; Delaney V; Salem F; Lewis S; Menon M; Taouli B
    Eur J Radiol; 2020 May; 126():108949. PubMed ID: 32179424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.